Huntsman Corporation

Huntsman Corporation (HUN) Market Cap

Huntsman Corporation has a market capitalization of $2.49B.

Price: $14.21

-0.05 (-0.35%)

Market Cap: 2.49B

NYSE · time unavailable

CEO: Peter R. Huntsman

Sector: Basic Materials

Industry: Chemicals

IPO Date: 2005-02-14

Website: https://www.huntsman.com

Huntsman Corporation (HUN) - Company Information

Market Cap: 2.49B|Sector: Basic Materials

Company Profile

Huntsman Corporation manufactures and sells differentiated organic chemical products worldwide. The company operates through four segments: Polyurethanes, Performance Products, Advanced Materials, and Textile Effects. The Polyurethanes segment offers polyurethane chemicals, including methyl diphenyl diisocyanate, polyols, thermoplastic polyurethane, propylene oxide, and methyl tertiary-butyl ether products. The Performance Products segment manufactures amines and maleic anhydrides, including ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, glycols, ethylene dichloride, caustic soda, ammonia, hydrogen, methylamines, and acrylonitrile. The Advanced Materials segment offers epoxy, acrylic, polyurethane, and acrylonitrile-butadiene-based polymer formulations; high performance thermoset resins, curing agents and toughening agents, and carbon nanotubes additives; and base liquid and solid resins. The Textile Effects segment provides textile chemicals and dyes. The company's products are used in a range of applications, including adhesives, aerospace, automotive, construction products, durable and non-durable consumer products, electronics, insulation, medical, packaging, coatings and construction, power generation, refining, synthetic fiber, textile chemicals, and dye industries. Huntsman Corporation was founded in 1970 and is headquartered in The Woodlands, Texas.

Analyst Sentiment

29%
Underperform

From 14 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $12.80

▼ -9.9% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$9

Median

$13

High Bound

$15

Average

$13

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$12.80
▼ -9.92% Upside
Low Target
$9.00
-37% Risk
Median Target
$13.00
-9% Mid
High Target
$15.00
6% Max
Consensus
Hold
14 / 33 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)2,4922,3031,7301,5501,7982,7223,1034,1653,852
Enterprise Value ($M)4,6104,4214,0353,4833,8354,7435,0006,1135,858
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)-7.59-10.86-4.91-16.15-2.83-170.14-5.50-31.5543.77
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)-2.26-117.70-0.836.19
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)0.441.621.281.061.231.932.142.702.45
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)0.920.860.630.560.640.921.051.341.24
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)18.46-25.3091.0510.1333.31-24.7530.4247.33-962.90
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)3.112.982.392.633.363.443.973.72
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)19.2169.07134.5040.9862.8865.88384.6148.9042.14
Debt to Equity Ratio8.820.930.990.870.860.800.760.730.75

HUN Growth Runway Model

Standard long term linear growth fade

Multi-Stage Discounted Cash Flow Sandbox

Market Price$14.21
Intrinsic Value$21.49
Market Alignment
Undervalued by 51.2%relative to calculated intrinsic value
9.00%
Exp: -3%-3%
i

Growth runway slowdown

This value provides a time window for the growth rate to decline beyond Stage 1 toward the terminal rate. Longer windows are most useful for companies with high growth starting conditions or strong competitive advantages. This option stretches out the growth rate slowdown across 5, 10, or 15-year steps. A high-growth starting condition (exceeding a 25% initial growth rate) automatically applies a curve decay to simulate realistic, rapid market saturation.
i

Terminal growth rate

With long-term inflation between 3-5%, revenue must grow by that baseline to maintain flat real-world market share. This value sets the permanent terminal growth rate to factor into the valuation beyond the growth slowdown runway toward maturity.

3-Stage Financial Runway Horizon

🧠 Perpetuity Horizon Engine (Stage 3: Post-2035)

Terminal FCF Base$0.40B
Perpetuity TV Value$7.53B
Discounted TV (PV)$3.18B
TV Weighting %55.8%
⚠️
Financial Model Disclaimer & Risk Disclosure: This interactive scenario simulator is an educational sandbox provided strictly for informational and analytical research purposes. Core historical financial statements and consensus estimates are sourced directly via Financial Modeling Prep (FMP). All downstream outputs are entirely deterministic, hypothetical projections generated by combining automated mathematical formulas (including linear interpolation and Gaussian bell-curve decay models) with user-selected variables and third-party financial data inputs. Users assume all liability for trading decisions executed based on these sandbox calculations.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 HUNTSMAN CORP (HUN) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Huntsman is a global specialty chemicals manufacturer focused on value-added intermediates and formulated systems for end markets such as coatings, construction, appliances, transportation, and industrial applications. The business operates across a chemical value chain that links (1) feedstock processing into key intermediates, (2) conversion into performance materials (notably polyurethanes and epoxy-related products), and (3) application-oriented support to help customers meet performance, safety, and regulatory requirements.

Revenue is generated when Huntsman sells differentiated products and systems into customer specifications, with ongoing demand supported by product qualification processes, engineering collaboration, and long qualification timelines typical in performance polymers and coatings.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Monetisation is primarily product-driven with limited direct “subscription” economics. The mix is best understood as:

  • Polyurethane and epoxy-related product sales that monetize through differentiation in performance properties (flexibility, durability, chemical resistance, thermal behavior) rather than pure commodity pricing.
  • Systems and application support where Huntsman participates earlier in customer formulations, supporting higher realized margins versus basic intermediates.

Margin drivers typically include (1) product mix toward higher-value formulations, (2) manufacturing efficiency and reliability of specialty assets, and (3) the ability to manage feedstock-cost volatility through pricing actions and contractual or customer-specific value positioning.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Huntsman’s moat is best characterized as a combination of Switching Costs, Integrated Cost Advantage, and Technical/Qualification Barriers rather than a single structural network effect.

  • Switching Costs / Qualification Barriers: Specialty polymer and coatings supply chains require extensive testing, certification, and process tuning. Once a formulation is qualified, changing suppliers can disrupt performance targets and application lines, creating meaningful customer stickiness.
  • Process and Manufacturing Integration: Scale and operational know-how in chemical manufacturing supports competitive cost positions and supply reliability—important for customers that prioritize continuity and spec compliance.
  • Technical Service and System-Level Collaboration: Customers value formulation support and performance verification, raising the effective “effort cost” of replacement even when a nominal price advantage exists.

Competitive benchmarking:

  • Covestro and BASF (broad, global chemical platforms) compete for polyurethane and broader performance material demand. Their scale can pressure pricing in more standardized product categories.
  • Dow competes across performance polymers and intermediates, often leveraging broad manufacturing footprints and customer relationships.
  • Wanhua is a notable competitor in polyurethane-focused materials, often strong in capacity and scale.

Compared with these rivals, Huntsman tends to emphasize application-oriented performance positioning and customer qualification dynamics, where specifications and system-level performance matter more than commodity-like pricing.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, growth is supported by end-market demand for performance materials and the need for efficient, durable, and regulated-compliant products:

  • Construction and infrastructure performance: Demand for durable coatings, sealants, insulation-related materials, and protective finishes supports continued utilization of polyurethane and epoxy systems.
  • Transportation efficiency and lightweighting: Automotive and industrial applications increasingly require materials that enable weight reduction and longevity under thermal and chemical stress.
  • Energy transition and industrial modernization: Wind, solar, grid infrastructure, and industrial maintenance cycles support protective coatings and adhesives used in harsh environments.
  • Regulatory-driven formulation upgrades: Stricter environmental, safety, and performance standards drive requalification toward higher-performance chemistries where incumbents with technical support can defend share.

TAM expansion is primarily achieved through product mix shifts toward higher-value specialty grades and systems, supported by customer qualification and service, rather than pure volume growth in commodity niches.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Cyclicality and margin compression: Specialty chemical earnings depend on spreads between selling prices and feedstock/energy inputs, as well as end-market industrial cycle strength.
  • Feedstock and energy volatility: Feedstock cost movements can pressure margins when price pass-through lags.
  • Capital intensity and maintenance cycles: Manufacturing reliability and environmental compliance require ongoing investment; cost overruns can affect normalized returns.
  • Regulatory and environmental compliance risk: Emissions, waste treatment, and evolving chemical regulations can increase operating costs and restrict processes or product lines.
  • Competitive capacity additions: Capacity expansions by large global peers can pressure pricing, particularly in more standardized grades.
  • Customer concentration and specification shifts: If customers change systems for cost or regulatory reasons, qualification timelines may not fully protect against long-cycle demand swings.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The market typically values specialty chemical businesses using EV/EBITDA and earnings power frameworks that focus on normalized margins, return on capital, and sustainable cash generation through the cycle. Key valuation sensitivities often include:

  • Normalized spread vs. feedstock costs (earnings durability across the chemical cycle).
  • Product mix and mix resilience (ability to maintain specialty-grade realizations).
  • Capital discipline (maintenance capex needs and any value-accretive investment programs).
  • Working capital dynamics tied to inventory and receivables, which influence free cash flow.

Because earnings can be cyclical, valuation discipline typically requires assessing whether the business can sustain margins through varying input and demand conditions, supported by specification-driven demand and manufacturing reliability.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Huntsman offers an institutional specialty-chemicals thesis anchored in customer qualification and switching costs, operational integration, and technical application support that help defend share against larger diversified competitors. The long-term opportunity is driven by performance-material demand in construction, transportation, and industrial applications, where regulatory and durability requirements favor suppliers with proven formulations and reliable specialty manufacturing.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for HUN.

gurufocus.com2026-06-05

Huntsman Sells its Italian Based Automotive Aftermarket Business

Huntsman Sells its Italian Based Automotive Aftermarket Business PR Newswire THE WOODLANDS, Texas, June 5, 2026

prnewswire.com2026-06-05

Huntsman Sells its Italian Based Automotive Aftermarket Business

THE WOODLANDS, Texas, June 5, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Huntsman Corporation (NYSE: HUN) announced today that it has sold Huntsman Gomet, a business located in Azeglio, Italy, to Trelleborg Group for €42.5 million (approximately $50 million), subject to customary post-closing adjustments. Gomet is a manufacturer of molded rubber and thermoplastic automotive aftermarket components, which was a business within Huntsman's Polyurethanes division, and was acquired by Huntsman in 2014 as part of the Rockwood acquisition.

gurufocus.com2026-06-04

Huntsman Corp (HUN) Shares Fall 3.2% -- What GF Score of 72 Tells Investors

On June 04, 2026, Huntsman Corp (HUN) shares fell 3.2% to $14.26. The stock has experienced a volatile year, with a 52-week range between $7.30 and $15.90. GF V

247wallst.com2026-05-15

Trump's Manufacturing Push Is Creating Tailwinds for These 3 Stocks Under $30

American manufacturing is having a moment. Reshoring incentives, the AIM Act refrigerant transition, EV plant buildouts, and aerospace demand are pushing capital back into U.S.

zacks.com2026-05-08

Huntsman's Q1 Earnings and Sales Top Estimates on Higher Volumes

HUN topped revenue estimates in Q1 as Polyurethanes volume growth and Advanced Materials strength offset pricing pressure.

seekingalpha.com2026-05-01

Huntsman Corporation (HUN) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Huntsman Corporation (HUN) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

seekingalpha.com2026-04-30

Huntsman: Q1 Is Further Evidence The Bottom Is In

Huntsman remains a buy, with sequential improvement expected as global supply tightens and end markets gradually recover. Q1 showed resilient volumes, margin expansion in Advanced Materials, and early benefits from cost-cutting and Middle East supply disruptions. Leverage is elevated at 6.1x due to cyclically depressed EBITDA, but liquidity is solid with a new $800M revolver and $369M cash.

zacks.com2026-04-30

Huntsman (HUN) Reports Q1 Earnings: What Key Metrics Have to Say

The headline numbers for Huntsman (HUN) give insight into how the company performed in the quarter ended March 2026, but it may be worthwhile to compare some of its key metrics to Wall Street estimates and the year-ago actuals.

zacks.com2026-04-30

Huntsman (HUN) Reports Q1 Loss, Beats Revenue Estimates

Huntsman (HUN) came out with a quarterly loss of $0.2 per share versus the Zacks Consensus Estimate of a loss of $0.23. This compares to a loss of $0.11 per share a year ago.

prnewswire.com2026-04-30

Huntsman Announces Second Quarter 2026 Common Dividend

THE WOODLANDS, Texas, April 30, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Huntsman Corporation (NYSE: HUN) announced today that its Board of Directors has declared a $0.0875 per share cash dividend on its common stock. The dividend is payable on June 30, 2026, to stockholders of record as of June 15, 2026.

prnewswire.com2026-04-30

Huntsman Announces First Quarter 2026 Earnings

First Quarter Highlights First quarter 2026 net loss attributable to Huntsman of $53 million compared to a net loss of $5 million in the prior year period; first quarter 2026 diluted loss per share of $0.31 compared to diluted loss per share $0.03 in the prior year period. First quarter 2026 adjusted net loss attributable to Huntsman of $35 million compared to adjusted net loss of $19 million in the prior year period; first quarter 2026 adjusted diluted loss per share of $0.20 compared to adjusted diluted loss per share of $0.11 in the prior year period.

zacks.com2026-04-23

Analysts Estimate Huntsman (HUN) to Report a Decline in Earnings: What to Look Out for

Huntsman (HUN) doesn't possess the right combination of the two key ingredients for a likely earnings beat in its upcoming report. Get prepared with the key expectations.

defenseworld.net2026-04-18

Analyzing Huntsman (NYSE:HUN) & Air Products and Chemicals (NYSE:APD)

Huntsman (NYSE: HUN - Get Free Report) and Air Products and Chemicals (NYSE: APD - Get Free Report) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings. Profitability This table compares Huntsman and

defenseworld.net2026-04-18

Stock Traders Purchase High Volume of Huntsman Put Options (NYSE:HUN)

Huntsman Corporation (NYSE: HUN - Get Free Report) saw some unusual options trading activity on Friday. Traders acquired 43,280 put options on the stock. This represents an increase of 457% compared to the average volume of 7,777 put options. Huntsman Trading Down 2.9% NYSE: HUN opened at $13.35 on Friday. The stock has a market cap of

defenseworld.net2026-04-08

Huntsman Corporation (NYSE:HUN) Given Average Recommendation of “Reduce” by Analysts

Shares of Huntsman Corporation (NYSE: HUN - Get Free Report) have earned an average rating of "Reduce" from the fourteen research firms that are covering the stock, MarketBeat reports. Four analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, eight have assigned a hold rating, one has issued a buy rating and one has given a

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"HUN reported Q1’26 revenue of $1.42B and net income of -$53M (EPS -$0.31). On a YoY basis, revenue was up 0.7% versus Q1’25 ($1.41B) while net income deteriorated to a loss from approximately breakeven (-$5M in Q1’25). QoQ, revenue rose 4.7% versus Q4’25 ($1.355B), but net income worsened materially (from -$96M in Q4’25 improved slightly to -$53M; however still remains firmly unprofitable). Profitability is structurally weak: gross margin declined to ~12.9% from ~14.3% in Q1’25 and operating/net margins remain negative (operating margin -1.1%; net margin -3.7% in Q1’26). The cash flow picture is also pressured—operating cash flow was -$53M and free cash flow -$91M in Q1’26, a sharp swing from the prior quarter’s positive operating cash flow (+$76M). Balance sheet resilience is mixed for a non-bank. Cash was $369M, down from $429M in Q4’25, while leverage remains elevated with total debt ~$2.06B and net debt ~$1.69B. Shareholder returns: the stock is up only +3.9% over the last 12 months, with a small dividend yield (~0.7%), implying limited capital appreciation momentum. Overall, Q1’26 shows revenue stability but continued profitability and cash burn concerns. Analyst targets (consensus ~$12 vs. price ~$13.35) suggest modest downside versus current levels."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

Revenue grew QoQ by ~4.7% (Q1’26 $1.42B vs Q4’25 $1.355B) and was up ~0.7% YoY (vs Q1’25 $1.41B), indicating modest top-line momentum but no acceleration.

Profitability

Neutral

Margins are contracting: gross margin fell (Q1’25 ~14.3% to Q1’26 ~12.9%). Operating margin is negative (-1.1%) and net margin -3.7%. Net income worsened YoY (loss -$53M vs near breakeven -$5M).

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Q1’26 operating cash flow was -$53M and free cash flow -$91M, a major deterioration from Q4’25 (OCF +$76M; FCF +$19M). This suggests weak near-term cash generation.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Caution

Leverage remains meaningful: total debt ~2.06B and net debt ~1.69B. Liquidity is adequate but weaker than prior quarter (cash $369M vs $429M). Equity is high on the provided balance sheet, but leverage could pressure flexibility under continued losses.

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

Total returns appear limited: 1-year price change +3.9% (no >20% momentum boost). Dividend yield is modest (~0.7%) and no buybacks/dividends are evident as strong offsets in this quarter’s cash flow.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Caution

Consensus target ~$12 vs current price ~$13.35 implies the market price is above the consensus view (modest downside). Valuation signals are uncertain due to negative earnings.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

Huntsman’s Q1 2026 call centers on pricing discipline and stronger-than-expected demand into Q2, especially supported by low inventory and heightened operating constraints in MDI. Management claims Polyurethanes pricing is staying ahead of benzene (benzene cited at $4.71) and expects Q2 pricing to offset well in excess of ~$100m of raw material costs absorbed in the quarter, implying margin improvement. However, sustainability is the central uncertainty: management repeatedly flagged demand as the largest variable for the second half, with inflation and Europe lethargy risks, plus less clear visibility beyond June. In MDI, industry utilization is described as moving toward the upper-80s/high-80s near ~90% globally, with specific pressure on Europe from gas cost differentials. Performance Products faces logistics-driven volatility from a Saudi ethylenamine asset constrained by Strait of Hormuz routing, with Q2 EBITDA impact ranging $30m–$40m due to truck economics and ~50% operating rates.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Advanced Materials recovery traction driven by aerospace and power end-markets; management expects results and momentum to be largely in line with what was expected a quarter ago
  • MDI supply tightness improving pricing power: industry moving into upper-80%/~90% utilization with multiple outages/disruptions absorbed by producers
  • Polyurethanes pricing initiatives staying ahead of benzene costs and offsetting large raw material cost absorption

Business Development

  • Composite Wood Products (CWP) and Technical Insulation demand strength in Europe (data center/warehouse/prefabricated building-related applications)
  • ACE (adhesives, coatings, elastomers) improvement in Europe tied to green-shoot demand (no named customer provided)
  • Saudi Arabia ethylenamine/joint-venture facility impacted by Gulf geography/logistics; operations ongoing albeit ~50% with truck-outs

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Polyurethanes: Q2 projected to absorb well in excess of ~$100m raw material costs in the quarter while expecting to offset via higher prices
  • Ethyl enamine joint venture (Performance Products): guidance step-up from $26m EBITDA to $30m–$40m EBITDA impact range in Q2, driven by facility down time, ~50% operating rate, and truck logistics (variability depends on economic routing success)
  • MDI pricing: management indicated North America all-product price trends have shown no quarter-on-quarter growth since 2022, but a quarterly jump is now visible into Q2; Europe also improving but with some strength attributed to Advanced Materials rather than macro
  • Mid-cycle reference for Polyurethanes: mid-teens EBITDA-on-average business target (no explicit bps deltas provided in transcript)
  • Benzene benchmark cited: benzene “just settled at $4.71”; management claims Polyurethanes exits Q2 staying ahead of raw materials into Q3

AI IconCapital Funding

  • No buyback amount, debt levels, or cash runway explicitly stated in the provided transcript excerpt

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Commercial priority: continue raising prices to offset rising costs; avoid being a “shock absorber” between raw material costs and finished product pricing
  • Operating priority: reliable plant execution to ensure product availability; management stated Q1 and early Q2 operations were “excellent”
  • Pre-buy management: customers buying ahead of announced price increases concentrated around “two to three days on MDI”; management discourages excessive pull-through and shifts to longer-term contract extensions when appropriate
  • Logistics workarounds: ethylenamine material trucked out (to the Red Sea and south) due to Strait of Hormuz constraints; Freeport facilities used to offset where possible

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • MDI utilization: industry low-to-mid 80s with management implying they are now in the high 80s; global MDI utilization cited around ~90% capacity utilization (upper-80s on stated capacity basis) due to outages and demand pull-through
  • Demand sustainability caution: management expects order visibility through June but less clarity further out; biggest variable for second half demand is macro
  • Construction activity: management expects ~2%–3% low single-digit growth in construction for 2026 (Q2 into Q3 timeframe), with permits down 11% in March cited as a step preceding starts
  • Q2 raw-material absorption vs pricing: management expects prices higher than raw material costs absorbed in Q2, implying sequential margin support (with sustainability dependent on demand)

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • MDI/Europe energy cost pressure: management cited European natural gas priced in mid-teens vs Houston ship channel under $2/MMBtu, implying continued petrochemical cost disadvantage in Europe
  • Competitive/structural pressure in China: differences in feedstock integration (coal vs teapot refineries vs refinery-integrated systems) could drive ongoing cost and export-related pressure
  • Sustainability of demand into Q3/Q4: management repeatedly emphasized uncertainty and “too early” to gauge third/fourth quarter order trends; risk of consumer/industrial inflation-driven demand pullback later in year
  • Polyurethanes profitability ceiling risk if demand weakens: profitability depends on demand and raw material stability; management noted European inflation factors are a concern
  • Performance Products headwind: ethylenamine facility logistics and temporary down time; potential cost/availability variability due to trucking vs shipping economics

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • MDI supply tightness and structural effects: Management described European gas cost gaps (mid-teens vs <$2/MMBtu in Houston), expected ongoing pressure on European MDI producers, and structural competitive distortions from Chinese feedstock/integration differences. They also tied ongoing effects to competition and raw-material realities beyond the immediate crisis window.
  • Polyurethanes pricing vs benzene timing and margin path: Analysts sought confirmation whether being ahead of benzene in Q2 creates a Q3 headwind as benzene catches up. Management said they expect to exit Q2 ahead of raw material costs into Q3, reinforced by benzene settling at $4.71, and that further pricing depends primarily on macro demand.
  • Ethyl enamine joint venture impact magnitude and Q2 range drivers: Management clarified the $30m–$40m Q2 step-up vs $26m prior EBITDA, attributing variability to the facility running ~50% after being down for a couple weeks and trucking material around the Red Sea/south. They cited potential $4.5m–$5m impact and emphasized economic routing success as the key swing factor.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the HUN Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for HUN.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (HUN)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Huntsman Corporation (HUN) Financial Profile