Standard BioTools Inc.

Standard BioTools Inc. (LAB) Market Cap

Standard BioTools Inc. has a market capitalization of $339.8M.

Price: $0.87

-0.03 (-3.27%)

Market Cap: 339.79M

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: Michael Egholm

Sector: Healthcare

Industry: Medical - Equipment & Services

IPO Date: 2011-02-10

Website: https://www.standardbio.com

Standard BioTools Inc. (LAB) - Company Information

Market Cap: 339.79M|Sector: Healthcare

Company Profile

Standard BioTools Inc., together with its subsidiaries, develops, manufactures, and sells a range of instrumentation, consumables, and services to scientists and biomedical researchers to develop therapeutics in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia pacific. The company operates through Proteomics and Genomics segments. Its proteomics and genomics include instruments, consumables, and assays for clinical and diagnostic uses. The company also provides SomaScan platform that enables researchers to measure proteins simultaneously and provides deep insights into biological processes and disease mechanisms; CyTOF technology platform that uses metal-tagged antibodies and time-of-flight mass spectrometry to eliminate signal interference and expand multiplexing capabilities; Hyperion, a spatial biology platform, which unlocks deeper insights into tissue organization by preserving spatial context while enabling high-dimensional molecular and proteomic analysis; and Biomark X9 system that redefines high-throughput genomics for quantitative polymerase chain reaction applications. The company sells its instruments and consumables for research use only to academic research institutions, translational research and medicine centers, cancer centers, and clinical research laboratories, as well as biopharmaceutical, biotechnology, and plant and animal research companies. It has license agreements with California Institute of Technology, Harvard University, and Caliper Life Sciences, Inc. The company was formerly known as Fluidigm Corporation and changed its name to Standard BioTools Inc. in November 2001. Standard BioTools Inc. was incorporated in 1999 and is headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.

Analyst Sentiment

77%
Strong Buy

From 2 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $3.25

▲ +274.4% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$3

Median

$3

High Bound

$3

Average

$3

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$3.25
▲ +274.42% Upside
Low Target
$3.25
274% Risk
Median Target
$3.25
274% Mid
High Target
$3.25
274% Max
Consensus
Buy
6 / 10 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)340357493497457408655717644
Enterprise Value ($M)104121405395327289522596465
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)-3.47-1.926.39-3.59-3.33-3.86-4.86-6.89-3.60
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)0.29-0.44-1.25-0.07
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)3.9416.8820.7125.4420.9820.2014.0315.9528.64
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)0.600.641.161.241.080.901.391.471.26
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)-3.60-7.57-294.60-21.54-20.24-11.56-37.58-23.80-15.72
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)5.7017.0420.2215.0114.3011.1713.2520.67
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)-1.27-9.13-19.55-12.64-20.07-14.97-20.05-29.15-22.47
Debt to Equity Ratio2.900.050.070.070.070.070.070.180.18

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 STANDARD BIOTOOLS INC (LAB) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Standard BioTools sells advanced laboratory systems and the related workflow that enables high-content cell and immune profiling. The value chain typically runs from (1) instrument procurement for research and translational laboratories, to (2) ongoing consumption of assay kits, consumables, reagents, and compatible panel components, and (3) recurring service/maintenance and software/data-analysis enablement.

Customer stickiness is reinforced by the end-to-end workflow: once a laboratory’s experimental protocols, validated panels, sample preparation routines, and data-analysis pipelines align to an instrument ecosystem, switching platforms requires re-validation, re-training, and re-establishing assay performance—creating structural inertia.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is generally a mix of (a) instruments (largely transactional), (b) consumables/reagents and related assay components (structurally recurring with experimental throughput), and (c) service/support and software or software-adjacent revenue (ongoing, contract-linked).

Margin structure typically reflects this mix: instruments contribute meaningful gross profit but carry cycle risk tied to capital budgets, while consumables/reagents and service tend to deliver more repeatable economics and stronger lifetime value per installed system. Operating leverage typically improves as the installed base scales, because fixed costs spread over a larger consumables and support stream.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Moat: Switching Costs + Installed-Base Ecosystem. The durable economic advantage is less about a single component and more about the integrated workflow.

  • High switching costs (workflow + validation burden): Laboratories develop operational familiarity and validate performance characteristics on a given platform. Changing instruments requires re-building throughput schedules, re-running controls, and re-validating panels and analysis settings.
  • Installed-base pull-through: Instruments create an installed base that drives ongoing consumables/reagents, service usage, and data-analysis needs over time.
  • Ecosystem fit: Compatibility of assay components and the maturity of application workflows reduce uncertainty for researchers and translational teams.

Competitive benchmarking:

  • Thermo Fisher Scientific: broad life-science tooling and reagents across many modalities; competes through scale and bundled offerings.
  • Cytek Biosciences: a direct competitor in advanced cell-analysis instrumentation; competes primarily on platform capabilities and performance positioning.
  • 10x Genomics: stronger presence in genomics-centric single-cell workflows; competes for budgets where sequencing workflows replace certain cytometry use cases.

Standard BioTools’ differentiation centers on an instrument-and-workflow approach tailored to high-dimensional cellular profiling, contrasted with the broader multi-modality bundling of Thermo Fisher and the genomics-led orientation of 10x Genomics.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

  • Expansion of single-cell and high-parameter immunology profiling: Broader adoption of multi-marker measurement supports discovery and translational development in oncology, immunology, and cell therapies.
  • Installed-base monetization: As systems accumulate in research institutions, biopharma, and CROs, consumables, service, and software/data workflow demands increase with experimental throughput.
  • Biopharma R&D intensity in translational endpoints: A structural need for phenotyping and biomarker characterization supports sustained demand for advanced measurement platforms.
  • Operational standardization across labs: Labs increasingly seek reproducibility and standardized workflows, which favors mature ecosystems with established protocols and consistent assay performance.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Technological modality shift: Growth in genomics-first or imaging-first workflows can redirect budgets away from cytometry-heavy approaches.
  • Competitive pressure on pricing and mix: Direct rivals with strong performance claims may pressure instrument economics or increase required commercial concessions.
  • Customer capex cyclicality: Instruments depend on research and development spending cycles, while consumables reduce—but do not eliminate—timing risk.
  • Regulatory and quality expectations (for translational/clinical-adjacent use): Quality systems, method robustness, and documentation become more demanding as tools are used closer to regulated workflows.
  • Execution and supply-chain risk: Consumables and components must meet consistent performance and availability requirements; disruptions can affect customer satisfaction and retention.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The market often values life-science tools through a combination of price-to-sales (for growth and platform adoption) and EV/EBITDA-style frameworks (for operating leverage as installed bases expand). Key valuation drivers typically include:

  • Installed-base growth and the resulting trajectory of consumables/service revenue.
  • Recurring revenue mix and gross margin durability as the business scales.
  • Evidence of operating leverage from R&D and overhead absorption.
  • Commercial execution, including retention, service attach rates, and expansion of application use cases.

Because instruments can be lumpy, markets tend to place a premium on businesses demonstrating predictable recurring monetization per installed system.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Standard BioTools’ long-term investment case rests on a durable installed-base model: instruments seed an ecosystem, and laboratories remain due to workflow validation and integration costs. With multi-year secular demand for high-dimensional cellular profiling and a monetization structure that increasingly reflects recurring consumables and service economics, the business can compound value as the installed base expands—provided competitive and technological shifts do not structurally impair the underlying workflow preference.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for LAB.

globenewswire.com2026-07-28

Standard BioTools Announces Sale of Mass Cytometry Business and Illumina's Buyout of Contingent Payments to Advance Merger with Treeline Biosciences

Sale of Mass Cytometry Business to Multiplex Bio Ensures Full Continuity of CyTOF and Hyperion Product Lines, Customer Relationships, Dedicated Team and Continued Investment in Next Generation Multiplex Platforms

globenewswire.com2026-07-22

Standard BioTools to Announce Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results on August 5, 2026

BOSTON, Mass., July 22, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Standard BioTools Inc. (NASDAQ: LAB) today announced that it will publish its second quarter 2026 financial results on Wednesday, August 5, 2026, after U.S. market close. About Standard BioTools Inc.

gurufocus.com2026-07-21

Are DXLG, LAB, FHB, RLYB Obtaining Fair Deals for their Shareholders?

Are DXLG, LAB, FHB, RLYB Obtaining Fair Deals for their Shareholders? PR Newswire NEW YORK, July 21, 2026

prnewswire.com2026-07-21

Are DXLG, LAB, FHB, RLYB Obtaining Fair Deals for their Shareholders?

/PRNewswire/ -- Halper Sadeh LLC, an investor rights law firm, is investigating the following companies for potential violations of the federal securities laws

globenewswire.com2026-07-20

Standard BioTools Announces Filing of Registration Statement in Connection with Treeline Biosciences Transaction

Highlights combined company's strong financial position with over $900 million expected at closing, Treeline's deep clinical-stage pipeline, planned 2027 data updates for TLN-121 and TLN-372, and expected new program clinical starts

globenewswire.com2026-06-19

BRODSKY & SMITH SHAREHOLDER UPDATE: Notifying Investors of the Following Investigations: AstroNova, Inc. (Nasdaq – ALOT), Open Lending Corporation (Nasdaq – LPRO), Huntsman Corporation (NYSE – HUN), Standard BioTools Inc. (Nasdaq – LAB)

BALA CYNWYD, Pa. , June 19, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Brodsky and Smith reminds investors of the following investigations. If you own shares and wish to discuss the investigation, contact Jason Brodsky (jbrodsky@brodskysmith. com) or Marc Ackerman (mackerman@brodskysmith. com) at 855-576-4847.

businesswire.com2026-06-17

LiveRamp Launches Agentic Partner Program to Fast-Track Agentic Deployments for Customers

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--LiveRamp (NYSE: RAMP), the leader in data collaboration, today announced LiveRamp Agent Builders (LAB), a new program to bring more partner-built agents into its network and accelerate marketers' ability to transform planning, measurement, activation, and data transformation with AI. During LAB's pilot period, brands will have access to agents from all of the AI companies participating in the program, enabling customers to focus on finding tools that create value.

prnewswire.com2026-06-15

Are ROKU, PAYO, LAB, FOX Obtaining Fair Deals for their Shareholders?

/PRNewswire/ -- Halper Sadeh LLC, an investor rights law firm, is investigating the following companies for potential violations of the federal securities laws

gurufocus.com2026-06-15

LAB Stock Alert: Halper Sadeh LLC is Investigating Whether Standard BioTools Inc. is Obtaining a Fair Price for its Shareholders

Halper Sadeh LLC, an investor rights law firm, is investigating the merger of Standard BioTools Inc. (NASDAQ: LAB) and Treeline Biosciences, Inc. Upon closing

businesswire.com2026-06-15

LAB Stock Alert: Halper Sadeh LLC is Investigating Whether Standard BioTools Inc. is Obtaining a Fair Price for its Shareholders

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Halper Sadeh LLC, an investor rights law firm, is investigating the merger of Standard BioTools Inc. (NASDAQ: LAB) and Treeline Biosciences, Inc. Upon closing of the proposed transaction, Standard BioTools shareholders are expected to own approximately 16% of the combined company. Halper Sadeh encourages Standard BioTools shareholders to click here to learn more about their rights and options or contact Daniel Sadeh or Zachary Halper free of charge at (212) 763-0060 o.

globenewswire.com2026-06-11

Labrador Gold to Host Investor Webinar on the Mariposa Gold Project in Yukon's White Gold District

TORONTO, June 11, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Labrador Gold Corp. (TSX Venture: LAB) ("Labrador Gold" or the "Company") is pleased to announce that it will host a live investor webinar on Wednesday, June 17, 2026, at 12:00 PM PT / 3:00 PM ET, featuring President and CEO Roger Moss and moderated by Cory Fleck of the KE Report. The webinar will provide investors with an in-depth overview of the Company's recently acquired Mariposa Gold Project, including its strategic location within the Yukon's prolific White Gold District, historical exploration results, the recently approved Class 1 permit, planned 2026 exploration activities and upcoming catalysts as the Company advances this district-scale gold opportunity.

newsfilecorp.com2026-06-11

Labrador Gold Announces 2026 Exploration Plans for Pacific Ridge's White Gold Projects

Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - June 11, 2026) - Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd. (TSXV: PEX) (OTCQB: PEXZF) (FSE: PQW) ("Pacific Ridge" or the "Company") is pleased to report that Labrador Gold Corp. (TSXV: LAB) ("LabGold") has announced plans for its 2026 exploration programs for the Company's Mariposa and Eureka Dome gold projects in the White Gold District, Yukon.

seekingalpha.com2026-06-08

Standard BioTools Inc. (LAB) Discusses Merger and Strategic Rationale Prepared Remarks Transcript

Standard BioTools Inc. (LAB) Discusses Merger and Strategic Rationale Prepared Remarks Transcript

globenewswire.com2026-06-08

Standard BioTools and Treeline Biosciences Announce Merger Agreement

Combined company to operate as Treeline Biosciences, advancing a deep pipeline of small molecule inhibitors, protein degraders and targeted therapy antibody-drug conjugates

zacks.com2026-05-05

Standard BioTools (LAB) Reports Q1 Loss, Tops Revenue Estimates

Standard BioTools (LAB) came out with a quarterly loss of $0.02 per share in line with the Zacks Consensus Estimate. This compares to a loss of $0.04 per share a year ago.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"LAB reported Q1 2026 revenue of $21.1M and EPS of -$0.12, with net loss of -$45.2M (net margin -213.9%). On a QoQ basis, revenue declined from $23.8M in Q4 2025 (-11.2%), while net income swung from a $19.3M profit in Q4 2025 to a $45.2M loss in Q1 (down ~$64.6M). On a YoY basis, revenue increased from $20.2M in Q1 2025 (+4.6%), but net income deteriorated from a -$26.0M loss to -$45.2M (worse by ~$19.2M). Profitability remains weak: gross margin improved to 53.5% in Q1 2026 (up from 43.0% in Q4 and ~54.6% in Q1 last year), but operating margin stayed deeply negative (-44.5%) due to very high operating expenses. R&D was $2.1M versus $7.8M in Q4 (lower sequentially), yet selling/general/administrative expenses remained elevated ($18.6M). Cash flow quality is mixed: operating cash flow was -$46.6M and free cash flow -$47.2M in Q1, but cash rose materially to $265.8M due to large acquisitions/investing inflows (notably acquisitionsNet). Balance sheet strength is notable for resilience: total assets increased to $639.1M and equity rose to $561.1M in Q1, with net cash (net debt -$236.3M). Shareholder returns appear pressured with 1-year price change of -17.7% and no dividend support (dividend yield 0%); buybacks are not indicated in this quarter."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

YoY revenue increased +4.6% (Q1 2026 $21.1M vs Q1 2025 $20.2M), but QoQ revenue fell -11.2% (Q4 2025 $23.8M to Q1 2026 $21.1M).

Profitability

Neutral

Net income turned from a profit to a large loss: Q1 2026 net loss -$45.2M vs Q4 2025 +$19.3M; YoY net loss widened (from -$26.0M). Operating margin remains deeply negative (-44.5%).

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Operating cash flow was -$46.6M and free cash flow -$47.2M in Q1 2026. No dividends; buybacks not present. Cash build was driven by investing/acquisitions activity, not operating performance.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Positive

High balance-sheet resilience with net cash position (netDebt -$236.3M) and strong equity ($561.1M) in Q1 2026; liquidity ratios remain very high (current ratio ~12.4).

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

1-year price momentum is negative (-17.7%). No dividend yield and no meaningful shareholder return signals from buybacks in the latest quarter.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Caution

Consensus price target appears at $3.25 (high=low=median). With current price ~0.9299 shown in marketPerformance data, implied upside is large, but the stock’s fundamentals are weak and losses persist.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

So what: Management sounded confident that Q1 execution stayed “on plan” and that full-year revenue guidance ($165M–$175M) remains unchanged, supported by improved instrument momentum (Hyperion XTi +24% YoY) and meaningful cost actions (non-GAAP OpEx -22% YoY; adjusted EBITDA loss improved 29%). However, the Q&A pressure points were more candid: U.S. academia demand isn’t “normalizing”—institutions signaled possible inability to purchase instruments this year and delays in consumables orders, with AACR-era constraints tied to curbing non-essential spending. On tariffs, management quantified the exposure (low single-digit millions annualized) but acknowledged partial/conditional pass-through and outlined which product geographies are affected (10% Singapore→US; “significant” US→China tariffs; Canada→US excluded). Illumina contribution is intentionally de-emphasized for 2025 (moderate, not significant growth), with the real growth story pushed to 2026+. Net: optimism on platform/instrument trajectory, but visible near-term demand and gross margin volatility remain.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Hyperion XTi spatial imaging instrument demand (double-digit YoY growth) and install-based leverage for consumables
  • CyTOF-XT Pro launch (higher-throughput, Part 11-compliant software) to drive pull-through in clinical trial research
  • SomaScan 3.7K Select Asset launch positioned as higher precision with improved economics
  • Single SOMAmer agent (minimal viable product to full availability) with early access expanding toward broader reagent market
  • New SomaScan offering at AACR pairing with Illumina distributed NGS-based Illumina partner solution

Business Development

  • Illumina partnership for distributed SomaScan offering (Illumina responsible for sales/marketing/support; launch expected in 2025, strong outlook for 2026+)
  • Illumina integration described as extending SomaScan reach to thousands of sequences worldwide via authorized sites
  • Large study examples: EPIC multicenter prostate cancer study; Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca lung complication study (ADC-related) supporting demand narrative

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Revenue: $40.8M in Q1 2025, down 10% YoY and in line with expectations
  • Consumables revenue: $14.5M, down 16% YoY (impacted by lower Americas academia revenue and fewer large-scale clinical research projects); also down mid-teens YoY and low single digits sequentially, with largest impact in flow
  • Instruments revenue: $7.8M, up 24% YoY driven by Hyperion XTi
  • Services revenue: $17.6M, down 16% YoY; lab services down 19% (backlog gap), field services down 11% (fewer active service contracts and lower on-demand service/parts revenue on improved uptime)
  • Non-GAAP gross margin: 53.2% vs 56.2% in Q1 2024 (down 3.0 pp); management attributes decline to lower volume, lower price realization on services, and product mix (offset by operating efficiency improvements)
  • Non-GAAP operating expenses: $38.6M, down 22% YoY (down $10.7M); sequential 10% reduction vs Q4 2024; additional $10M annualized run-rate cost reductions operationalized in Q1
  • Net loss: $(26.0)M vs $(32.2)M prior year (improvement of $6.2M; +19%)
  • Adjusted EBITDA: loss of $(16.9)M vs $(23.7)M prior year (improvement of $6.8M; +29%)
  • Cash: ended Q1 with ~$261M cash/cash equivalents/restricted cash/short-term investments; no material debt
  • Cash burn: $34M in Q1 2025 vs $101M in Q1 2024; adjusted cash burn $31M (33% reduction vs $47M)
  • Tariffs estimate: gross annualized impact in low single-digit millions of dollars; management estimates if fully absorbed, impact on gross margin and adjusted EBITDA would be in the low single-digit millions (within outlook)
  • Tariff specifics: Canada-made products shipped to USA excluded from tariffs under US MCA; Singapore-made products (biomark instruments and IFC consumables) subject to 10% tariff; SomaScan kits made in US shipped to authorized sites in China subject to significant tariffs

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Buyback: none mentioned
  • Balance sheet: ~$261M cash and equivalents/restricted cash/short-term investments
  • Debt: no material debt
  • Cost actions: $10M additional annualized cost reduction executed in late January; total annualized cost reductions since SomaLogic merger: $90M

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • SBS (Standard BioTools Business System) driving continuous improvement and cost/waste reduction
  • Integration of SomaLogic: applied SBS, took out over $80M in cost in ~12 months; re-engaged Illumina partner and improved manufacturing; operational rigor improving forecast accuracy and consistency
  • No change to full-year 2025 revenue guidance; expects profitability progress via further cost levers
  • Re-segmentation: no longer reporting proteomics vs genomics segments; treats business as one operating segment while still breaking out revenue into consumables, instruments, lab services, and field services

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Full-year 2025 revenue guidance reiterated: $165M to $175M (no change); back-half weighted expectation maintained
  • Americas academia revenue outlook reiterated: mid-teens % decline for 2025, with high single-digit millions revenue impact vs 2024
  • Tariff guidance reiterated: low single-digit millions annualized exposure; management intends to pass costs to customers where possible
  • Illumina partnership revenue timing: 2025 described as cautious/moderate growth vs 2024 development/early access revenues; 2026+ expected to show strong traction and strong growth

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Americas U.S. academic and government spending pressure: institutions advising they don’t know if they can buy instruments; delay in consumables orders; AACR observation that academia customers curtailed non-essential expenditures (inability to travel)
  • Quarter-to-quarter variability and concentration risk: services concentrated in a handful of large accounts; backlog timing delays and variability still impact quarterly performance
  • Consumables softness driven by project timing and funding uncertainty in the Americas
  • Tariffs and geopolitical volatility: new tariff measures add complexity/disruption; management states impact is manageable but not materially in top-line near-term (still affects gross margin/EBITDA if fully absorbed)
  • Project funding/NIH budget uncertainty as a key end-demand risk (management explicitly references intensified NIH budgets/tariff concerns)

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the LAB Q1 2025 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for LAB.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
No recent 10-K available.
No recent 10-Q available.
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (LAB)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Standard BioTools Inc. (LAB) Financial Profile