Portillo's Inc.

Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) Market Cap

Portillo's Inc. has a market capitalization of $288.8M.

Price: $3.99

0.18 (4.72%)

Market Cap: 288.80M

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: Brett A. Patterson

Sector: Consumer Cyclical

Industry: Restaurants

IPO Date: 2021-10-21

Website: https://www.portillos.com

Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) - Company Information

Market Cap: 288.80M|Sector: Consumer Cyclical

Company Profile

Portillo's Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the ownership and operation of fast casual and quick service restaurants in the United States. The company offers Chicago-style hot dogs and sausages, Italian beef sandwiches, char-grilled burgers, chopped salads, crinkle-cut French fries, homemade chocolate cakes, and chocolate cake shakes. As of March 10, 2022, it operated in 70 locations across nine states. The company also offers its products through its website. Portillo's Inc. was founded in 1963 and is based in Oak Brook, Illinois.

Analyst Sentiment

72%
Buy

From 13 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $6.63

▲ +66.2% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$5

Median

$7

High Bound

$8

Average

$7

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$6.63
▲ +66.17% Upside
Low Target
$5.25
32% Risk
Median Target
$6.50
63% Mid
High Target
$8.00
101% Max
Consensus
Hold
3 / 12 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 29, 2026Dec 28, 2025Sep 28, 2025Jun 29, 2025Mar 30, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 29, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)289378320459789759594834582
Enterprise Value ($M)9531,0431,3001,0971,4021,3581,1671,3911,144
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)18.40-235.3213.0994.4822.6657.2813.1828.8822.49
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)5.503.333.702.33
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)0.392.071.722.534.194.303.224.683.20
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)0.610.800.681.001.721.871.482.181.57
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)-33.67-417.20-40.48-92.35151.64-79.15-106.24108.0837.34
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)5.717.006.057.447.706.327.806.29
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)13.5683.9269.2287.6752.7574.8543.3556.9244.44
Debt to Equity Ratio9.451.462.141.431.371.501.491.511.55
⚠️

Valuation Model Suspended

API Payload Error: Inverted or negative baseline Free Cash Flow margin detected (-2.3%).

Troubleshooting Notice: The upstream financial data supplier has uploaded corrupted or inverted baseline metrics for PTLO. The server sandbox cannot calculate an intrinsic value path from negative cash generation baselines.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

```html

📘 PORTILLO S INC CLASS A (PTLO) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Portillo’s operates as a fast-casual restaurant concept centered on Chicago-style hot dogs and Italian beef, with an execution model built around high-throughput ordering, drive-thru- and carryout-friendly store formats, and a standardized kitchen process. The value chain is straightforward: source ingredients, convert them into signature menu items through repeatable line operations, and monetize demand through dine-in, takeout, drive-thru, and delivery channels. Because restaurants are location-based businesses, the core operational “engine” is store-level economics—labor productivity, food cost control, and sales per unit—reinforced by disciplined real estate selection and consistent training/operating procedures.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is primarily transactional and generated by restaurant sales across multiple ordering methods. Monetisation is driven by:

  • Menu mix and ticket structure: margin profile depends on the proportion of beef/pork-based items, sides, beverages, and desserts, as well as customization complexity.
  • Throughput and labor efficiency: drive-thru and carryout volumes require strong workflow design; improved speed and order accuracy typically support volume without proportionate labor increases.
  • Channel mix: dine-in, takeout/carryout, drive-thru, and delivery each have different cost structures and operational implications (including third-party delivery fees where applicable).
  • Ongoing store operations: while revenue is not “recurring” in a software sense, operational continuity provides repeat purchase behavior and steadier demand patterns versus one-time sales.

Overall margin drivers are concentrated in food cost discipline, wage productivity, unit-level operating leverage, and the ability to maintain consistent quality across expanded footprints.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Portillo’s’ moat is less about switching costs (customers can try other concepts easily) and more about a combination of operating know-how, supply-chain/process consistency, and scale-based cost advantages that improve store-level profitability as the system grows. The company’s intangible asset is its ability to replicate a specific cooking/assembly workflow and menu experience across new restaurants while controlling training time and build-to-operational performance.

  • Scale/Distribution leverage (cost advantage): expanding purchasing volume and operational standardization can improve ingredient sourcing terms, reduce waste, and increase controllability of food cost.
  • Execution & store playbook (intangible operational asset): consistent preparation methods, kitchen line design, and staffing models lower the ramp risk typical of new unit openings.
  • Geographic positioning and repeat visit cadence: concentrated brand presence in served areas supports habit formation and routing convenience (particularly where drive-thru formats matter).

Competitive benchmarking:

  • Culver’s: also fast-casual with strong regional footprint and loyalty/brand-driven repeat visits; Portillo’s competes via a different signature product set (Chicago-style items) and a workflow optimized for its menu.
  • Five Guys: positioned around burgers with a broad menu simplicity; Portillo’s differentiation is concentrated in hot dog/Italian beef offerings and the operational flow required for those items.
  • Shake Shack: urban/suburban fast-casual with a premium burger focus and strong marketing emphasis; Portillo’s competes more directly on signature regional cuisine and drive-thru/carryout-oriented throughput rather than premium burger positioning.

Compared with these peers, Portillo’s emphasis is on a distinct menu identity plus an execution system designed to translate that identity into consistent unit economics.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Sustainable growth over a 5–10 year horizon is primarily a function of unit expansion, operational improvement, and the durability of fast-casual demand drivers:

  • Unit count expansion: scaling restaurant locations expands revenue capacity while leveraging the operating playbook to reduce ramp friction.
  • Format and channel mix optimization: selecting store designs that support carryout and drive-thru can improve throughput and help capture convenient-demand segments.
  • Menu engineering and merchandising discipline: targeted product mix improvements can enhance contribution margins without requiring major operational reinvention.
  • Secular demand for quick, flavorful, convenient dining: customers continue to favor on-demand formats that deliver predictable quality faster than full-service concepts.
  • Geographic growth strategy: extending into new markets can broaden addressable demand while building brand familiarity through repeat exposure and local density.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Commodity and food inflation: key inputs for beef/pork and other staple ingredients can pressure food costs; mitigating actions depend on pricing power and supplier contracts.
  • Labor availability and wage pressure: restaurants are inherently labor-intensive; sustained wage growth can compress margins if productivity does not offset costs.
  • New unit execution risk: build quality, layout suitability, and training effectiveness can affect ramp-to-maturity economics and increase impairment risk if underperformance persists.
  • Competitive intensity: peers can respond with promotions, new locations, and menu additions that dilute demand or increase customer acquisition costs.
  • Regulatory and health/safety compliance: local permitting, food safety standards, and employment regulations can increase operating complexity and costs.
  • Real estate and construction cost swings: capex intensity and lease/land economics influence long-term returns at each site.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Equity market valuation for restaurant operators typically places emphasis on unit economics and forward profitability, with trading frameworks often anchored to metrics such as EV/EBITDA and P/S (depending on perceived margin durability and growth runway). The key value drivers tend to be:

  • Store-level margin trajectory: ability to sustain food cost control and labor productivity.
  • Same-store performance durability: resilience of demand and mix under competitive and inflationary conditions.
  • Growth quality: return on incremental restaurant investments and ramp performance.
  • Operating leverage: how incremental revenue translates to operating income as fixed costs are absorbed.

In this sector, the market can re-rate expectations when execution changes—either through improved throughput and margins or through slower ramps and cost pressure.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Portillo’s offers an investment thesis centered on scaling a differentiated, regionally anchored fast-casual concept through repeatable operations. The most defensible elements are its execution-driven store playbook and scale-related cost discipline that can support unit profitability as the restaurant base expands. The primary challenge is sustaining margin resilience amid labor and commodity volatility while maintaining high-quality execution in new locations.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

```

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for PTLO.

globenewswire.com2026-06-05

Portillo's Comes Home to the Heart of Chicago with Plans to Open Landmark Michigan Avenue Restaurant

Chicago-born brand unveils plans to bring its iconic food and energy to its first inline restaurant in downtown Chicago – a pivotal step in its growth strategy Chicago-born brand unveils plans to bring its iconic food and energy to its first inline restaurant in downtown Chicago – a pivotal step in its growth strategy

globenewswire.com2026-05-27

Now Boarding: Cakes on a Plane

The iconic Chicago-style restaurant lands at DFW Airport with a new small-format concept, grab-and-go offerings and free Chocolate Cake for the first 200 guests OAK BROOK, Ill. , May 27, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Portillo's (NASDAQ: PTLO) - the fast-casual restaurant concept known for its menu of unrivaled Chicago-style street food - today announced the opening of its first-ever airport location at Dallas Fort Worth International Airport on May 27.

globenewswire.com2026-05-27

Now Boarding: Cakes on a Plane

The iconic Chicago-style restaurant lands at DFW Airport with a new small-format concept, grab-and-go offerings and free Chocolate Cake for the first 200 guests OAK BROOK, Ill., May 27, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Portillo's (NASDAQ: PTLO) – the fast-casual restaurant concept known for its menu of unrivaled Chicago-style street food – today announced the opening of its first-ever airport location at Dallas Fort Worth International Airport on May 27.

seekingalpha.com2026-05-07

Portillo's Could Still Work, Just Not The Way Market Expected

Portillo's remains a 'Buy' as the market has likely priced in a worst-case scenario, despite a double miss and post-earnings sell-off. PTLO is transitioning from a high-growth to a cash-generative, operationally focused model, with a strategic reset under new leadership and reduced restaurant openings. Near-term headwinds include margin compression from operational deleveraging, weak same-store sales, and pricing challenges, but positive FCF inflection is expected by FY 2027.

seekingalpha.com2026-05-05

Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

zacks.com2026-05-05

Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) Reports Q1 Loss, Lags Revenue Estimates

Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) came out with a quarterly loss of $0.01 per share versus the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.01. This compares to earnings of $0.05 per share a year ago.

globenewswire.com2026-05-05

Portillo's Inc. Announces First Quarter 2026 Financial Results

OAK BROOK, Ill., May 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Portillo's Inc. (“Portillo's” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: PTLO), the one-of-a-kind restaurant concept known for its menu of Chicago-style favorites, today reported financial results for the first quarter ended March 29, 2026.

globenewswire.com2026-05-01

Portillo's Turns Up the Heat this May with New Hot & Saucy Italian Beef Sandwich

Savor Portillo's first-ever Italian Beef LTO featuring hot Giardiniera Peppers and creamy Giardiniera Sauce Savor Portillo's first-ever Italian Beef LTO featuring hot Giardiniera Peppers and creamy Giardiniera Sauce

zacks.com2026-04-28

PTLO vs. CMG: Which Stock Should Value Investors Buy Now?

Investors with an interest in Retail - Restaurants stocks have likely encountered both Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) and Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG). But which of these two companies is the best option for those looking for undervalued stocks?

zacks.com2026-04-28

Earnings Preview: Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) Q1 Earnings Expected to Decline

Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) doesn't possess the right combination of the two key ingredients for a likely earnings beat in its upcoming report. Get prepared with the key expectations.

zacks.com2026-04-28

Is Burlington Stores (BURL) Stock Outpacing Its Retail-Wholesale Peers This Year?

Here is how Burlington Stores (BURL) and Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) have performed compared to their sector so far this year.

globenewswire.com2026-04-20

Portillo's Announces First Quarter 2026 Earnings Webcast

OAK BROOK, Ill., April 20, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Portillo's, Inc. (NASDAQ: PTLO) announces the following event: What: PTLO Q1 2026 Earnings Webcast     When: Tuesday, May 5 at 10 a.m.

defenseworld.net2026-04-01

Financial Comparison: Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) and Portillo’s (NASDAQ:PTLO)

Portillo's (NASDAQ: PTLO - Get Free Report) and Yum China (NYSE: YUMC - Get Free Report) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, earnings, risk and institutional ownership. Profitability This table compares Portillo's and Yum China's net

defenseworld.net2026-03-29

Portillo’s Inc. (NASDAQ:PTLO) Receives Average Recommendation of “Hold” from Brokerages

Portillo's Inc. (NASDAQ: PTLO - Get Free Report) has been assigned a consensus recommendation of "Hold" from the thirteen research firms that are presently covering the firm, Marketbeat Ratings reports. One investment analyst has rated the stock with a sell recommendation, nine have given a hold recommendation and three have given a buy recommendation to the

globenewswire.com2026-03-11

Eugene I. Lee, Jr. Appointed Chairman of the Board of Portillo's; Michael A. Miles, Jr. to Retire as of Annual Meeting

Directors Michael A. Miles, Jr. and Joshua A. Lutzker announce they will not stand for reelection at the Company's 2026 Annual Meeting Directors Michael A. Miles, Jr. and Joshua A. Lutzker announce they will not stand for reelection at the Company's 2026 Annual Meeting

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-29

"PTLO reported Q1 2026 revenue of $182.6M and a net loss of $(0.4)M (EPS: $(0.01)). Sequentially, revenue declined $(1.7)M QoQ (from $185.7M in Q4’25), and net income swung from +$6.1M in Q4’25 to a small loss in Q1’26. Year-over-year, revenue increased +3.4% (Q1’26 vs Q1’25: $182.6M vs $176.4M), while net income declined sharply, turning from +$3.3M in Q1’25 to $(0.4)M in Q1’26 (about -112% YoY). Profitability deteriorated in the most recent quarter: net margin fell to about -0.2% versus +1.9% in Q1’25 and +3.3% in Q4’25. Gross margin remains positive but has been highly volatile across the last four quarters (roughly 16% in Q3’25 and ~41% in Q2’25, before 1.75x in Q4’25 and 66.9% in Q1’26—suggesting accounting/classification variability). Cash flow remains mixed. Operating cash flow was +$17.6M in Q1’26, but free cash flow was slightly negative at $(0.9)M due to capex. Balance sheet resilience looks constrained: liquidity is weak (current ratio ~0.26) and leverage remains elevated with total debt of ~$348M and net debt of ~$324M. Shareholder returns are currently weak: the stock is down -50.1% over 1 year and paid no dividends or buybacks, so total shareholder return momentum is negative. Revenue and Earnings-based metrics were not applicable for this analysis due to the company's pre-revenue status. The evaluation focused on cash runway, burn rate, and market sentiment instead."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

Revenue rose +3.4% YoY in Q1’26 ($182.6M vs $176.4M) but fell -0.9% QoQ ($182.6M vs $185.7M). Trend is mild YoY growth with recent QoQ softness.

Profitability

Neutral

Net income deteriorated to a loss of $(0.4)M in Q1’26 vs +$3.3M in Q1’25 (down ~112% YoY). Margins contracted materially: net margin ~-0.2% in Q1’26 vs +1.9% in Q1’25 and +3.3% in Q4’25.

Cash Flow Quality

Caution

Operating cash flow was positive (+$17.6M) but free cash flow was negative (−$0.9M) due to capex. Cash generation is not yet consistently translating into FCF.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Neutral

Liquidity is tight (current ratio ~0.26). Leverage remains meaningful with total debt ~$348M and net debt ~$324M; equity is ~$501M but the balance sheet is still debt-heavy.

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

Market performance is weak: 1Y change −50.1%. No dividends (0% yield) and no evident buybacks in the quarter, so total shareholder return is likely negative.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Caution

Street target consensus is $7.1 vs current price $5.91 (implied upside ~20%). However, given profitability volatility and negative 1Y momentum, valuation support may be fragile.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

PTLO’s Q1 2026 showed modest top-line growth (+3.5% YoY) but slight same-store deterioration (-0.1% comp) as average check fell (-0.9%) despite transaction improvement (+0.8%). Management leaned on promotional traffic drivers (BIG Burger Bundle, Perks offers) plus innovation (birthday cake LTO, new sauces), yet net effective pricing and margins compressed. Restaurant-level adjusted EBITDA fell $1.8M with ~170 bps margin decline to 19.1%, driven by deleverage from new openings, higher labor (wage inflation, benefits) and commodity pressure (beef/produce +1.8% in food costs). April and May comps are expected to remain pressured due to promotional lap effects and trade-down-driven mix weakness; management doesn’t expect Q2 pricing to go negative after a mid-April ~2% category increase. Longer term, they’re tightening development discipline, derisking beef via forward buying (65% of flats locked), and building a MarTech stack—signals that credibility will hinge on restoring check, stabilizing promotions, and lifting unit economics.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Limited-time BIG Burger Bundle meal drove transactions and net effective pricing in Q1 ($9.99 burger/fries/drink).
  • Innovation-led traffic lift: new birthday cake LTO and launch of new sauces.
  • Hot & Saucy beef promotion positioned as an LTO (not a typical discount) supporting value-driven frequency.

Business Development

  • Frisco, Texas: opened one additional restaurant since quarter-end; expects three more openings in 2026.
  • DFW International Airport: first airport location planned for 2026.
  • Downtown Chicago: second in-line location planned for 2026.
  • Customer/insight partnerships: outside partners commissioned landmark studies led by CMO Denise Lauer (customer segmentation, brand positioning, menu satisfaction).

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Revenue $182.6M (+$6.2M, +3.5% YoY); non-comp restaurants contributed +$7.7M; same-restaurant sales -0.1% (about -$0.2M).
  • Same-restaurant drivers: average check -0.9%, transactions +0.8% (mix -1.0% offset by menu price +0.1%; promotional offers increased).
  • Incremental pricing actions roll-off: started Q1 with ~3% incremental pricing from 2025 actions; rolled off ~1.5% in January, ~1% in April, remainder ~0.7% to lapse in June; no additional pricing actions in Q1; took ~2% pricing action mid-April across select categories.
  • Restaurant level adjusted EBITDA: $34.8M, down $1.8M YoY; margin declined ~170 bps to 19.1% (from 20.8%).
  • Gross margin drivers: food/bev/packaging 34.7% of revenue vs 34.6% last year; commodity costs +1.8% (beef/produce) partially offset by menu price increases net of promos.
  • Labor: 26.9% of revenue vs 26.6%; hourly wages +~1.5% YoY; deleverage from new restaurant openings and higher benefits/wage inflation partially offset by labor efficiencies.
  • Other OpEx as % revenue: 13.2% vs 12.4%; other OpEx increased $2.3M (+10.7%) tied to weather-related variability (utilities/snow removal) and new restaurant openings/repairs & maintenance.
  • G&A: $20.4M (11.1% of revenue) vs $18.9M (10.7%); driven by higher equity-based compensation and professional fees; included ~$0.5M dead site costs.
  • Adjusted EBITDA: $18.5M (10.1% of revenue) vs $21.2M (12.0%); down $2.8M YoY.
  • Tax: income tax benefit +$0.2M vs expense $1.4M prior year; effective tax rate 24.4% vs 25.4% due to valuation allowance changes tied to equity-based comp.
  • Liquidity: operating cash flow +85.8% YoY to $17.6M; ended quarter with $24M cash.

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Cash balance: $24M at quarter end.
  • Debt/liquidity: $104M outstanding on revolver; total net debt $347M; ~$42M remaining revolver capacity.
  • No buyback amount or explicit share repurchase authorization mentioned in transcript.

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Operational excellence pillar emphasized: guest-centric execution (standard, served accurately/on time) with increased CEO time in restaurants.
  • Marketing/MarTech work underway: stack building for channel usage, media-mix usage, offer strategy by customer segmentation.
  • Value offer lag acknowledged: Perks and BIG Burger Bundle create value perception lag while driving traffic; focus includes measuring value perception scores and post-promo visit outcomes.
  • Development strategy tightening: reassessing pipeline; additional dead site costs in Q1 from timing/scale of planned openings and site evaluation changes.

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Company reiterated fiscal year guidance; expectations may evolve as strategic work progresses and new finance leadership begins.
  • Near-term pricing outlook: management does not expect effective pricing in Q2 to be negative; as of May, pricing is just under 3% (post mid-April +2% action and partial April roll-off).
  • April trend commentary: negative comp trends ~1 point in April driven by transactions and mix; headwinds expected in May due to lapping BOGO Beef promotion.

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Input costs: projecting mid-single-digit commodity inflation for the year; beef expected to be a pressure point remainder of 2026 (Q4 most pressured).
  • Promotional dependency: Perks offers and value bundles drive traffic but can create value-perception lag and may depress net effective pricing/margins.
  • Weather impacts in January: higher utilities and snow maintenance/removal expenses caused OpEx variability; some operational drag likely contributed to early-quarter softness.
  • Comps pressured by lapping promotions/pilots: April headwinds from lapping breakfast pilot benefit; May headwinds from lapping BOGO Beef promotion.
  • New restaurant deleverage: labor deleverage from new openings contributed to margin compression.

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Topic: Q1 comp progression and April underlying trends: Management described weather-driven negativity in January, then sequential improvement into late Q1. For April, they flagged negative trends ~1 point, primarily transaction and mix weakness from increased trade-down behavior, with continued negative mix in the month.
  • Topic: Pricing mechanics and whether Perks/offer strategy harms traffic long-term: Management clarified net pricing impact came from BIG Burger Bundle ($9.99) and Perks offers, noting a value-perception lag and focusing on value scores post-promo. They emphasized using innovation/LTOs to drive frequency without locking into a purely discounted model.
  • Topic: Development pipeline changes and dead-site costs: Management linked dead site costs (~$0.5M mentioned) to 2026 timing and reassessment of pipeline. They said 2027 sites were re-evaluated, with decisions to exit a couple opportunities, targeting 4–6 openings in 2027, implying more dead site costs in Q2.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the PTLO Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for PTLO.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (PTLO)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) Financial Profile