Stifel Financial Corp

Stifel Financial Corp (SF) Market Cap

Stifel Financial Corp has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Ronald James Kruszewski

Sector: Financial Services

Industry: Investment - Banking & Investment Services

IPO Date: 1983-07-19

Website: https://www.stifel.com

Stifel Financial Corp (SF) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Financial Services

Company Profile

Stifel Financial Corp. operates as the bank holding company for Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated that provides retail and institutional wealth management, and investment banking services to individual, corporations, municipalities, and institutions in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. It operates in three segments: Global Wealth Management, Institutional Group, and Other. The company provides private client services, including securities transaction and financial planning services; securities brokerage services, such as the sale of equities, mutual funds, fixed income products, and insurance; institutional equity and fixed income sales, trading and research, and municipal finance services; investment banking services, such as mergers and acquisitions, public offerings, and private placements; and retail and commercial banking services comprising personal and commercial lending programs, as well as deposit accounts. It participates in and manages underwritings for corporate and public finance; and offers financial advisory and securities brokerage services. The company was founded in 1890 and is headquartered in Saint Louis, Missouri.

Analyst Sentiment

69%
Buy

From 9 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $90.00

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$90

Median

$90

High Bound

$90

Average

$90

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$90.00
▲ +8.55% Upside
Low Target
$90.00
9% Risk
Median Target
$90.00
9% Mid
High Target
$90.00
9% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 STIFEL FINANCIAL CORP (SF) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Stifel Financial operates a full-service capital markets and wealth management platform. The company serves individual investors, families, and institutions through (i) a broker-dealer and advisory network, (ii) asset management and investment products, and (iii) capital markets activities such as underwriting, trading, and related advisory services. Revenue is generated through recurring fee streams tied to client assets and through transaction-driven income tied to capital markets volumes.

Client stickiness is supported by relationship-based advisory and the operational friction of moving assets across firms (account opening, suitability and documentation, and transferring positions). Advisors and client teams also provide continuity across market cycles, which encourages longer retention of assets and incremental cross-selling within a regulated framework.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

  • Wealth management and advisory fees (asset-based): Primarily recurring in nature, driven by client assets under management and advisory accounts. Margin profile is typically more stable than purely transaction-based businesses.
  • Brokerage and trading revenues (transaction-based): Commissions and trading-related income tied to client activity, market liquidity, and capital markets issuance activity.
  • Net interest and financing economics: Income linked to client cash usage (including margin lending and other funding programs) and interest-rate/positioning dynamics. This is where deposit-analog economics matter for broker-dealers—funding cost and mix influence earnings sensitivity.
  • Investment banking and underwriting: Fees and spreads connected to issuance and advisory mandates, with cyclical variability.

Overall monetisation is a blend of recurring asset-based economics and cyclical transaction and underwriting activity. Operating leverage tends to flow through the firm’s balance-sheet-driven businesses (financing, trading, principal activity) while wealth management provides a stabilizing base.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Moat: regulatory access + funding economics + credit culture. Stifel’s competitive strength is less about a single product and more about operating proficiency across regulated, capital-constrained activities: maintaining market access, managing customer funding economics, and controlling credit and inventory risk within market-making and underwriting exposures.

  • Cost of “deposits” / funding advantage: As a broker-dealer, Stifel benefits from the ability to earn spread on customer cash/margin-related balances where funding costs and program mix are managed effectively. Lower effective funding costs and good liquidity management can support earnings stability.
  • Regulatory moats (capital and compliance): Broker-dealers face ongoing capital, liquidity, and conduct requirements (SEC/FINRA frameworks). Sustained compliance infrastructure and capital planning can raise barriers to entry for challengers attempting to scale a comparable business model.
  • Credit culture and risk discipline: Stifel’s lending, margin-related exposures, underwriting, and other credit-sensitive activities require consistent risk governance. Good underwriting discipline and inventory/risk controls help protect downside during market drawdowns and credit tightening.

Competitive benchmarking (focus vs. peers):

  • Raymond James: Similar emphasis on independent advisors and wealth management, but different distribution mix and capital markets footprint can influence earnings stability and credit exposure.
  • Morgan Stanley: More globally diversified with a heavier institutional/global markets weighting; this can shift risk drivers toward large-market cycles rather than advisor-driven retention.
  • UBS: Strong global wealth platform and capital markets capabilities; the competitive set differs in balance-sheet scale and geographic mix, while Stifel’s positioning is more focused on the advisor-centered wealth model.

Against these rivals, Stifel’s industry focus emphasizes durable client relationships and regulated capital markets execution, aiming to balance recurring advisory economics with selective participation in investment banking and trading where risk can be actively managed.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

  • Wealth creation and wealth transfer: Long-duration growth in investable assets driven by demographic shifts and continued savings accumulation supports the addressable market for private client advisory services.
  • Advisor productivity and retention: Scaling advisor teams, improving productivity, and maintaining client retention can compound assets under management over time.
  • Cross-selling of financial solutions: Retention of client relationships enables incremental revenue through managed solutions, advisory services, and product distribution within regulatory guardrails.
  • Capital markets participation with controlled risk: Ongoing demand for underwriting and advisory services from issuers and institutions can support fee pools, provided credit and market risk limits are respected.

Over a 5–10 year horizon, the core TAM tailwinds are driven more by client asset growth and distribution expansion than by single-product cycles. The key question for investors is whether Stifel can sustain client retention and funding economics while keeping credit discipline intact through market regimes.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Market and transaction cyclicality: Capital markets revenues and client trading activity can decline during periods of reduced liquidity or lower issuance activity.
  • Balance-sheet sensitivity: Financing economics, hedging effectiveness, and exposure to margin and trading counterparties can influence earnings volatility.
  • Credit losses and counterparty risk: Any deterioration in credit quality—through lending/margin exposures, underwriting credit, or counterparty performance—can impair results.
  • Regulatory and conduct risk: Changes to capital requirements, broker-dealer rules, or market structure can affect balance-sheet capacity, compliance costs, and product economics.
  • Client asset outflows: Wealth management performance and market conditions can influence client behavior and product allocations, impacting recurring fee revenue.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The market typically values broker-dealers and wealth managers based on sustainable earnings power and balance-sheet efficiency rather than a single uniform metric. Common valuation lenses include price-to-earnings (earnings durability), price-to-book (regulatory capital and return on equity), and assessments of run-rate profitability through economic sensitivities (wealth fee growth, net interest and financing contribution, capital markets profitability, and credit costs).

Key drivers that move valuation perceptions include: (i) stability of recurring advisory/wealth revenues, (ii) funding and net interest economics, (iii) underwriting and trading profitability through cycles, and (iv) demonstrated risk management evidenced by contained credit losses and resilient capital ratios.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Stifel’s long-term investment case rests on a regulated, relationship-driven wealth platform supported by capital markets execution, with the structural advantages anchored in regulatory access, funding economics, and disciplined credit culture. The firm’s ability to sustain advisor/client retention and manage balance-sheet and credit risk through market regimes is the central determinant of compounding outcomes.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"SF reported Q1’26 revenue of $1.67B and net income of $251.4M (EPS $2.45). YoY, revenue rose ~14.8% (vs. $1.45B in Q1’25) and net income increased ~374.0% (vs. $53.0M). QoQ, revenue grew ~-4.9% (vs. $1.75B in Q4’25) while net income declined ~-4.9% (vs. $264.4M). Profitability improved versus last year: net margin expanded to 15.1% from 3.6% a year ago, alongside higher operating margin (32.6% vs. 4.4%). Over the last four quarters, gross margin trended down from the Q4’25 high (89.0%) but remained strong (~82.8% in Q1’26). Operating cash flow was -$61.6M in Q1’26 and free cash flow was -$109.5M, reflecting working-capital drag (change in working capital of -$431.8M). Balance sheet resilience remains solid: total assets grew to ~$42.9B and equity was stable at ~$6.0B; net debt is modest (~$46M), indicating limited leverage risk. Shareholder returns appear favorable: the stock is up 47.6% over 1 year and pays a modest dividend yield (~1.0%), supporting a positive total-return backdrop. Valuation sentiment is mixed (P/E ~7.6; analyst consensus target ~$93.4 vs. $82.3 current)."

Revenue Growth

Positive

YoY revenue increased ~14.8% in Q1’26 ($1.67B vs. $1.45B). QoQ revenue declined ~-4.9% ($1.75B in Q4’25 to $1.67B). Momentum is improving year-over-year but softer sequentially.

Profitability

Strong

Net income YoY rose ~374.0%, lifting net margin to 15.1% (from 3.6% in Q1’25). Operating margin also expanded sharply (32.6% vs. 4.4%). QoQ net income fell ~-4.9%, but profitability remains well above prior-year levels.

Cash Flow Quality

Fair

Q1’26 operating cash flow was -$61.6M and free cash flow was -$109.5M, driven by significant working-capital outflow (change in working capital of -$431.8M). Prior quarter was positive OCF (~$320.8M), so cash performance is volatile.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Good

Total assets increased to ~$42.9B and equity stayed stable at ~$6.0B. Leverage appears contained: net debt is minimal (~$46M). Short-term liquidity ratios look weak in reported ratios, but overall leverage risk remains limited.

Shareholder Returns

Good

1-year price momentum is strong (+47.6%), materially boosting total shareholder return potential. Dividend yield is modest (~1.0%). Buyback activity occurred (repurchased ~$96.4M shares in Q1’26).

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

Consensus target (~$93.44) is above the current price ($82.32), implying upside. Valuation metrics are not stretched (P/E ~7.6), but cash flow softness and sequential earnings decline temper conviction.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

Stifel delivered strong Q2 momentum with net revenue of $1.45B (+13% YoY) and non-GAAP EPS of $1.42 (+25% YoY). The beat was concentrated in investment banking, where capital raising outperformed expectations after a sizable late-quarter transaction, while transactional revenue was weak (-2% vs expectation, -3% YoY). Global Wealth Management posted record results ($957M, +13% YoY) supported by transactional activity, NII growth, and asset management gains despite the SIA sale’s run-rate impact. Operating leverage improved materially: institutional pretax margin expanded to 19.5% in the first half (+850 bps), and the comp ratio fell to 57% (60 bps below consensus; down 50 bps sequentially). Management reaffirmed up to $4B loan growth and guided 3Q NII of $290M–$300M, leveraging excess capital (~$480M) and continued venture/fund-banking deposit funding. Q&A centered on whether bank M&A/sponsor weakness offsets broader platform strength and how AI supports adviser productivity without triggering recruitment or fee pressure.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Investment banking outperformance: capital raising revenue exceeded expectations by $23 million (+7%) due to a sizable late-quarter transaction
  • Global Wealth Management record net revenue of $957 million (+13% YoY), driven by transactional revenue plus net interest income and asset management growth
  • Loan-book expansion: added $2.6 billion of loans in the quarter, positioning FY balance sheet growth to reach up to $4 billion
  • Venture / off-balance-sheet deposit funding to support balance sheet growth (moved ~$2.6 billion of venture deposits onto balance sheet; still >$3 billion available)

Business Development

  • Sale of SIA in the quarter (first full quarter following sale) impacting asset management and transactional run-rate
  • Recent July-announced transaction expected to close in 2026 with a “significant fee” (mentioned in response to bank M&A/backlog question)
  • J.D. Power ranking: #1 in employee adviser satisfaction for four consecutive years

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Q2 non-GAAP EPS of $1.42 (+25% YoY) and Q2 net revenue of $1.45 billion (+13% YoY)
  • Q2 total non-GAAP revenue: $1.45 billion, +2% above consensus; investment banking beat by $23 million (+7%) and specifically capital raising beat vs Street
  • Comp ratio: 57% was 60 bps below consensus; sequentially down from 57.5% in Q1 to 57% (down 50 bps sequentially)
  • Institutional Group pretax margin: 19.5% in first half 2026 vs 11% a year ago (+850 bps improvement)
  • Effective tax rate: 24.4% (slightly below consensus, within guidance)
  • Net interest income: at higher end of full-year guidance; $4 million above consensus; supported by higher interest-earning assets
  • Institutional revenue: $481 million (+15% YoY); firm-wide investment banking up +42% YoY in Q2; investment banking capital raising up +121% YoY
  • Institutional transactional revenue down 19% YoY (lower fixed income), with stated Q2’25 aircraft business gain of ~$30 million as a key comparison item

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Deployed >$0.5 billion in Q2 across reinvestment, share repurchases, and dividends
  • Repurchased 2.4 million shares during the quarter; 7.8 million shares remaining under current authorization
  • Tier 1 leverage ratio: 11.2%; Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio: 17.3%
  • Excess capital: nearly $480 million based on a 10% Tier 1 leverage target
  • Third-quarter fully diluted share count expected: ~160.5 million shares (assuming no additional repurchases and stable stock price)

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Efficiency initiatives continued to flow through to profitability: comp ratio reduced and operating noncomp ratio within guidance (18%–20%)
  • Sequential comp flexibility: management guided comp ratio midpoint to lower-half of full-year range of 56.5% to 57.5%
  • Capital formation and advisory pipelines framed as broad-based (health care, industrials, technology, energy), not solely tied to bank depository M&A
  • AI positioning: AI framed as a productivity accelerator for advisers and internal teams; management emphasized “adviser tools, advisers redeploy” rather than human replacement

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • 3Q 2026 net interest income guidance: $290 million to $300 million (based on incremental growth and stable NIM)
  • Full-year loan growth guidance: up to $4 billion (on pace after $2.6 billion loan-book growth in Q2)
  • Management characterized 2H seasonally strong and asserted confidence in full-year performance given capital position and pipeline strength

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • AI-driven “adviser threat” narrative in markets (management argues this has not reduced recruiting; implies reputational/valuation risk if investors change assumptions)
  • Bank M&A / sponsor activity uncertainty: buyer strike and measured pace of M&A cycle; sponsor community described as “on the sidelines”
  • Institutional transactional revenue headwinds: down 19% YoY driven by lower fixed income revenue and European restructuring impact on equity transactional revenue (-4% YoY)
  • Investment banking upside depends on continued pipeline strength and market conditions (volatility likely to remain part of the landscape)

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Bank M&A/ECM/Middle-market sponsor outlook: Management said bank depository M&A is muted versus expectations due to uncertainty and a “buyer strike,” but optimism is broader across Stifel’s platform (health care, industrials, technology, energy). They also cited July’s announced deal and that increased sponsor activity could lift fee opportunities.
  • Operating leverage sustainability & AI’s role: Management clarified AI will improve productivity rather than replace costs, requiring more talented people to exploit opportunity. For incremental margins, Institutional and Private Client were described as >20% incremental margin at higher revenues, while consolidated leverage depends heavily on compensation line and second-half comp flexibility to 56.5%–57.5%.
  • Adviser recruitment/fee pressure risk from AI productivity: Management acknowledged fee pressure exists structurally but argued it has been most intense in product “building blocks” (e.g., ETFs) rather than holistic relationship advice. They emphasized Stifel’s culture/incentives and adviser autonomy for redeploying freed time, forecasting competitive advantage via AI-enhanced judgment and relationships.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the SF Q2 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — Stifel Financial Corp (SF) Financial Profile