Viking Holdings Ltd

Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) Market Cap

Viking Holdings Ltd has a market capitalization of $46.36B.

Price: $104.35

▼ -0.10 (-0.10%)

Market Cap: 46.36B

NYSE ¡ time unavailable

CEO: Leah Talacta

Sector: Consumer Cyclical

Industry: Travel Services

IPO Date: 2024-05-01

Website: https://www.vikingcruisescanada.com

Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) - Company Information

Market Cap: 46.36B|Sector: Consumer Cyclical

Company Profile

Viking Holdings Ltd specializes in passenger transportation services, primarily through sea travel, across North America, the United Kingdom, and on a global scale. The company's activities are structured into distinct River and Ocean operational segments. Furthermore, it functions as a tour provider for its clientele and undertakes associated tourism endeavors. As of December 31, 2023, Viking commanded a substantial fleet of 92 vessels. This included 81 riverboats, which were made up of 58 Longships, 10 smaller vessels drawing on the Longship design, 11 other diverse river vessels, a single chartered river vessel, and the distinctive Viking Mississippi. Additionally, its fleet comprised 9 ocean liners and 2 expedition ships. Founded in 1997, Viking Holdings Ltd maintains its principal office in Pembroke, Bermuda.

Analyst Sentiment

79%
Strong Buy

From 22 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $103.07

▼ -1.2% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$75

Median

$105

High Bound

$120

Average

$103

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$103.07
▼ -1.23% Upside
Low Target
$75.00
-28% Risk
Median Target
$105.00
1% Mid
High Target
$120.00
15% Max
Consensus
Buy
12 / 15 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)46,35532,76331,72927,56323,62017,60619,01615,05912,133
Enterprise Value ($M)48,13734,54633,66630,17226,83320,37622,24717,98615,613
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)38.51-153.0826.2513.4013.46-41.4145.9010.0322.47
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)———2.110.12——1.740.19
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)6.9631.0918.4013.7812.5619.6314.098.977.64
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)44.7631.5229.0134.4485.85-65.09-85.38-19.18-10.25
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)37.28216.1446.6745.23-119.6539.87-105.7221.0855.74
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)—32.7819.5215.0914.2722.7116.4810.719.84
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)25.81334.8471.4743.2545.23382.8783.8533.8948.03
Debt to Equity Ratio0.965.615.257.0520.57-20.47-25.02-6.77-4.49

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 VIKING HOLDINGS LTD (VIK) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Viking Holdings operates premium passenger travel—primarily ocean and river cruises—by bundling ship operations, itinerary design, and guest services into an all-in package experience. The value chain starts with fleet utilization (ship ownership and/or chartering), flows through voyage planning and destination execution (ports, logistics, shore programming), and ends with monetization of the customer journey via ticket sales plus onboard and land-based add-ons.

Customer stickiness is driven by repeat-booking behavior, curated itinerary ecosystems (river systems and destination “regions”), and a product design that reduces perceived effort for the consumer (packaged logistics, consistent service standards, and predictable quality). While cruises are not a subscription model, the company benefits from a customer lifecycle with follow-on sailings and multi-occasion planning.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is primarily generated from:

  • Base cruise fares (core ticket revenue), typically supplemented by package components and included amenities that support premium pricing.
  • Onboard and experience revenue (e.g., specialty dining, beverage services, entertainment).
  • Shore excursions and destination services (paid upgrades that expand per-guest value).
  • Retail and partner services associated with the travel experience (where offered).

Margin drivers center on (1) occupancy and yield (pricing discipline and load factors), (2) operating leverage from fixed ship and crew costs spread over passenger volumes, and (3) ancillary attachment (conversion of base bookings into excursions and onboard spend). Cost discipline—especially in labor, port charges, and energy—acts as a second-order lever on operating margins.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Viking’s competitive position is anchored less in “pure brand awareness” and more in premium product design that supports pricing power, along with an itinerary and service ecosystem that raises practical switching friction for customers who value consistency and curated experiences.

  • Intangible asset / premium positioning (pricing power): Viking targets travelers seeking a higher service standard and a more controlled experience. This premium positioning supports yield resilience compared with mass-market cruise peers, particularly where guests value quality over lowest fare.
  • Switching friction via experience design: After a customer adopts Viking’s service model, downstream choices (shipboard style, excursion curation, service standards) become more predictable, lowering the perceived planning and quality risk of switching.
  • Operational expertise in complex itineraries: River cruising in particular depends on tight scheduling, destination coordination, and product consistency—competitors face execution risk when attempting comparable service levels.

Competitive benchmarking:

  • Royal Caribbean Group and Carnival Corporation (large-scale ocean cruise operators): these competitors lean more toward broader capacity, diverse onboard entertainment, and mass-market appeal. Viking’s focus on premium guest experience and curated itineraries differentiates product economics and target demographics.
  • Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings: competitors emphasize scale and onboard offerings across a wider price spectrum. Viking’s relative emphasis on consistent, destination-led experiences supports a different value proposition.
  • River-cruise specialists such as AmaWaterways and Avalon Waterways (where publicly benchmarked): Viking competes in the premium river segment with a similar emphasis on curated itineraries, but Viking’s execution model and ship deployment strategy differ by route and onboard format.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, growth is supported by several structural demand and capacity dynamics:

  • Premiumization in leisure travel: Higher disposable income segments and preference for structured experiences tend to support premium cruise demand versus lower-cost travel alternatives.
  • River cruising category expansion: Aging demographics in source markets, coupled with a preference for manageable travel formats and destination depth, supports ongoing growth in river itineraries.
  • Itinerary depth and network effects within product ecosystems: Customers who enjoy a given destination set tend to explore adjacent routes and voyages, supporting repeat bookings and multi-trip planning cycles.
  • Fleet deployment and refurbishment cycles: New builds, redeployments, and upgrades can improve guest experience, support pricing, and expand route coverage.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Fuel and energy cost volatility: Operating costs can swing with fuel prices and consumption intensity, affecting margins through energy pass-through limitations.
  • Regulatory and environmental compliance: Emissions standards and port restrictions increase costs and can constrain itinerary flexibility.
  • Destination and geopolitics risk: Concentration in popular regions increases exposure to disruptions from travel advisories, safety incidents, or political events.
  • Capital intensity and financing conditions: Fleet economics depend on access to capital and disciplined investment timing; refinancing risk and cost of capital matter.
  • Operational execution: Cruise performance is sensitive to crew availability, scheduling reliability, and incident management; execution setbacks can harm future bookings.
  • Demand cyclicality: Leisure travel remains sensitive to macroeconomic conditions and consumer confidence.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Equity markets typically value cruise operators and premium travel businesses through a blend of:

  • EV/EBITDA and earnings multiples, driven by operating leverage from occupancy and yield.
  • Per-guest profitability metrics (where disclosed), especially the contribution from onboard and shore excursion revenue.
  • Forward operating assumptions on capacity deployment, pricing discipline, and cost normalization.

Key value-moving factors typically include sustainable load factors, resilient pricing (yield), ancillary monetization rates, and control of variable costs (fuel, port charges, labor). On the balance sheet, fleet strategy and liquidity are also important given capital intensity.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Viking Holdings offers a premium travel model with an emphasis on curated itineraries, consistent service delivery, and monetization beyond the base fare. The investment case rests on intangible and structural advantages—premium positioning that supports pricing power and practical switching friction arising from experience ecosystem familiarity—while the principal risks center on cost volatility, regulatory/environmental constraints, and capital discipline in fleet deployment.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for VIK.

investors.com•2026-08-01

GE Aerospace, AI Play Lead Five Stocks Near Buy Points

Three of these watchlist stocks have already passed their earnings tests.

businesswire.com•2026-07-29

Viking Takes Delivery of Newest River Ship in Europe

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Viking® (www.viking.com) (NYSE: VIK) today announced it has taken delivery of the Viking Dagur, the company's newest Viking Longship®. The Viking Dagur was built at Meyer's Neptun Werft shipyard in Rostock-Warnemünde, Germany. The 190-guest Viking Dagur joins the company's growing fleet of state-of-the-art sister ships and will sail Viking's popular itineraries on the Rhine, Main and Danube rivers. “We are proud to welcome the Viking Dagur to our award-winning rive.

defenseworld.net•2026-07-26

Bank of New York Mellon Corp Trims Stock Position in Viking Holdings Ltd. $VIK

Bank of New York Mellon Corp lessened its stake in Viking Holdings Ltd. (NYSE: VIK) by 10.1% in the undefined quarter, according to its most recent Form 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The institutional investor owned 503,313 shares of the company's stock after selling 56,820 shares during the period.

defenseworld.net•2026-07-25

Viking Holdings Ltd. $VIK Shares Acquired by Bank of Nova Scotia

Bank of Nova Scotia boosted its holdings in Viking Holdings Ltd. (NYSE: VIK) by 33.5% during the first quarter, according to its most recent Form 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The fund owned 436,651 shares of the company's stock after acquiring an additional 109,471 shares during the period. Bank of

zacks.com•2026-07-21

EXPE or VIK: Which Is the Better Value Stock Right Now?

Investors with an interest in Leisure and Recreation Services stocks have likely encountered both Expedia (EXPE) and Viking Holdings (VIK). But which of these two stocks offers value investors a better bang for their buck right now?

zacks.com•2026-07-20

U.S. Consumer Sentiment Index Hits Five-Month High: 5 Top Picks

U.S. consumer sentiment hit a five-month high as energy costs fell. CTAS, CZR, NCLH, NWSA and VIK are five consumer discretionary picks for H2 2026.

seekingalpha.com•2026-07-15

Artisan Mid Cap Fund Q2 2026 Performance Review

Artisan Mid Cap Fund portfolio generated strong absolute returns and outpaced the Russell MidcapÂŽ Growth Index. Within IT, several semiconductor holdings produced exceptional returns, with multiple positions rising more than 100% during the period. During the quarter, we initiated new positions in Entegris, Modine Manufacturing and C.H. Robinson Worldwide.

marketbeat.com•2026-07-15

Marriott vs. Viking: Why the Better Quarter Doesn't Mean the Better Decade

Spending on travel and tourism continues nearly unabated. Total U.S. tourism spending reached approximately $1.35 trillion in 2025, according to the U.S. Travel Association's Fall 2025 Forecast.

businesswire.com•2026-07-14

Viking Announces Two New Oberammergau Voyages for 2030

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--VikingÂŽ (www.viking.com) (NYSE: VIK) today announced two new river voyages for 2030 that will offer guests the rare opportunity to experience the world-renowned Passion Play in Oberammergau, Germany, which has been performed every 10 years for nearly 400 years. With departure dates from May through September 2030, the new Oberammergau, Innsbruck & the Rhine and Oberammergau with Salzburg itineraries both feature preferred seating at the 43rd Passion Play and al.

zacks.com•2026-06-17

LTH or VIK: Which Is the Better Value Stock Right Now?

Investors interested in Leisure and Recreation Services stocks are likely familiar with Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH) and Viking Holdings (VIK). But which of these two stocks presents investors with the better value opportunity right now?

businesswire.com•2026-06-11

Viking Takes Delivery of Newest River Ships in Europe

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Viking® (www.viking.com) (NYSE: VIK) today announced it has taken delivery of its newest river ships, the Viking Annar and the Viking Fjolvar. Both vessels were built at Meyer's Neptun Werft shipyard in Rostock-Warnemünde, Germany. The Viking Annar will sail Viking's itineraries on the Rhine, Main and Danube rivers, while the Viking Fjolvar will sail itineraries on the Seine River. “We are proud to welcome the Viking Annar and the Viking Fjolvar to our growing flee.

fool.com•2026-06-10

5 Reasons Viking Is a Different Kind of Cruise Line Stock

Viking is crushing the market with an 84% jump over the past year. The three better-known cruise line stocks are losing to the market.

businesswire.com•2026-06-05

Viking Announces New Offerings for European River Voyages

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Viking® (www.viking.com) (NYSE: VIK) today announced a range of new European river voyage experiences that are now open for booking. Highlights include scenic Zeppelin airship excursions in Germany, offering guests on select Rhine River itineraries aerial views of Cologne and the Ruhr Valley, along with new culinary and cultural shore excursions, small group shore excursions and expanded options for land extensions across Europe. “Europe remains a favorite destinat.

247wallst.com•2026-06-03

Here Are Wednesday’s Top Wall Street Analyst Research Calls: Boyd Gaming, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Conagra, Dollar General, MGM Resorts International, Omnicom Group, Yum! Brands, and More

Mid-Day Stocks: Stocks are trading lower on Wednesday, as oil and yields move higher. Once again, it was "Welcome back, my friends to the show that never ends." On cue, the never-say-die stock market shook off early worries and all the major indices closed higher on Tuesday. Like the proverbial broken record, the S&P 500... Here Are Wednesday's Top Wall Street Analyst Research Calls: Boyd Gaming, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Conagra, Dollar General, MGM Resorts International, Omnicom Group, Yum! Brands, and More

zacks.com•2026-06-01

LTH vs. VIK: Which Stock Is the Better Value Option?

Investors interested in Leisure and Recreation Services stocks are likely familiar with Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH) and Viking Holdings (VIK). But which of these two stocks is more attractive to value investors?

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"VIK reported Q1 2026 revenue of $1.05B and net loss of $(54)M (EPS: $(0.12)). Revenue fell sharply QoQ but rose meaningfully YoY: QoQ revenue declined about -38.9% vs. Q4 2025 ($1.72B), while YoY revenue increased about +17.4% vs. Q1 2025 ($897M). Net income deteriorated both QoQ and YoY: QoQ net income dropped from +$300M in Q4 2025 to -$54M (down ~-118%), and YoY shifted from -$105M to -$54M (improvement of ~+48.4% but still negative). Profitability contracted materially. Gross margin eased to ~27.0% in Q1 2026 from ~36.7% in Q4 2025 and ~26.2% in Q1 2025. Operating income turned sharply negative at the pre-tax level, with net margin at ~-5.2% (down from +17.4% in Q4 2025). Cash flow remains positive on operations: operating cash flow (OCF) was $683M and free cash flow (FCF) was $152M in Q1 2026. Balance sheet liquidity is strong with $4.05B cash, and leverage looks manageable given net cash of about -$3.64B (netDebt negative), even though current liabilities are elevated. Total shareholder returns appear highly supportive: the stock is up ~113.7% over the last 1 year, which should boost the return component despite fundamentals weakening this quarter. No dividends were paid; no buybacks reported in the quarter."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

YoY revenue improved to $1.05B (+17.4% vs $897M in Q1 2025) but QoQ revenue fell from $1.72B to $1.05B (-38.9%), indicating volatility rather than steady momentum.

Profitability

Neutral

Net income swung from +$300M (Q4 2025) to -$54M (Q1 2026). Net margin deteriorated to -5.2% from +17.4% QoQ; gross margin also contracted to ~27.0% from ~36.7%.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Despite a net loss, cash generation was strong: OCF was $683M and FCF $152M in Q1 2026. However, losses persist, so cash quality is not yet translating into earnings.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Positive

Liquidity is a clear strength (cash $4.05B). Net debt is negative (about -$3.64B), suggesting resilience; equity remains positive at ~$1.07B.

Shareholder Returns

Good

Total return momentum is strong: 1Y price change of ~+113.7% materially exceeds the >20% threshold. No dividend yield and no buybacks were reported in Q1.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

With current price ~85.8 and consensus target ~86.55, upside appears limited. High P/S and negative P/E (losses) keep valuation risk elevated.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

Viking started 2026 with strong demand visibility and pricing discipline, evidenced by 92% of 2026 core capacity booked and advanced bookings of $6.2B (+13% YoY) as of May 3. Q1 financials reinforced momentum: revenue +17.5% YoY to >$1.0B, adjusted gross margin +16.9% YoY to $717M, net yield up 9.5% to $596, and adjusted EBITDA up 43.9% to $105M. The key operational driver was mix and pricing rather than volume stress: River net yield surged 28.3% to $761 on higher-yielding Egypt/Vietnam builds and intentional removal of lower-yield winter Europe capacity. Ocean net yield rose 5.6% to $527. Balance-sheet liquidity remains strong with $4.0B cash, $1.0B undrawn revolver, and net leverage improving to ~1.0x. Management reaffirmed mid-single-digit yield growth targets assuming stable macro, while flagging fuel volatility and temporary river booking softening (now rebounding) as the main near-term headwinds.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Viking Eldir joined European Rivers in March; increased long-ship capacity base for European river demand
  • Acquisition of Viking Yidun to support Chinese traveler growth; new Europe ocean itineraries tailored for Chinese guests aboard Yidun
  • Egypt new-build momentum: float out of 2 river vessels for Nile delivery later in 2026; 2 additional Egypt river vessels ordered for 2028
  • Hydrogen-powered milestone: float out of Viking Libra, described as the first hydrogen-powered ocean cruise ship capable of 0 emissions operation

Business Development

  • Airline alliances agreements for Viking air purchases (major airline alliances; prompts booking when guests choose Viking air)
  • River fleet additions/commitments: 10 river vessels delivered during 2026 and 8 more scheduled for 2027 (supports Egypt/Vietnam high-yield mix)
  • China-demand expansion via Viking Yidun and cross-selling ocean itineraries

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Total revenue +17.5% YoY to over $1.0B
  • Adjusted gross margin +16.9% YoY to $717M; net yield $596 (+9.5% YoY)
  • Adjusted EBITDA $105M (+43.9% YoY)
  • Net loss improved to $(54.2)M, improving by more than $51M YoY (Q1 seasonality cited as typically negative)
  • River segment: occupancy 93.7%; net yield $761 (+28.3% YoY); adjusted gross margin +17.2% YoY
  • Ocean segment: occupancy 95%; net yield $527 (+5.6% YoY); adjusted gross margin +16.9% YoY
  • Fuel cost exposure: fuel ~4% of adjusted gross margin in 2025; higher fuel prices expected to matter later in 2026 (Q1 timing benefit); river includes fixed-price contracts for significant portion of 2026 season

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Balance sheet/lq: cash and cash equivalents $4.0B; undrawn revolver $1.0B; net debt $1.9B
  • Net leverage improved from 1.1x (Dec 31, 2025) to 1.0x (Mar 31, 2026)
  • Deferred revenue $5.4B as of Mar 31, 2026
  • Debt amortization: scheduled principal payments remaining 2026 of $174.4M; full-year 2027 principal payments of $197.4M
  • Committed ship CapEx: FY26 ~$1.9B total (~$650M net of financing); FY27 ~$1.0B total (~$260M net of financing)

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Booking visibility: 2026 core products 92% booked; capacity growth in core products +15% in 2027
  • Marketing posture: already marketing for 2027; marketing scaled dynamically with demand/capacity; management cited planned SG&A efficiencies via tools including LLM searches and website conversion/personalization
  • Pricing/yield management: dynamic pricing for remaining season inventory; rate sensitivity differs by segment (ocean more sensitive than river)
  • Operational cost cadence: vessel expenses excluding fuel per PCD +10.6% YoY largely due to repair & maintenance timing/schedules (project-based, not quarterly managed)

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Booking curves as of May 3, 2026: 2026 core products 92% booked; advanced bookings $6.2B (+13% YoY) and capacity +7%
  • 2027 core products: 38% booked; advanced bookings $3.4B (+31% YoY vs same point 2025) with capacity +15%
  • Long-term targets reaffirmed: mid-single-digit yield growth across core products if macro conditions are stable
  • Ocean booking curves (as of May 3, 2026): 2026 sold 92% with advanced bookings $2.8B (+17% YoY), capacity +9%, average booking rate/PCD $777 vs $737 in 2025; 2027 ~46% sold with capacity +18%, advanced bookings +38% YoY, average booking rate/PCD $882 vs $786 for 2026 at same time
  • River booking curves (as of May 3, 2026): 2026 93% sold; advanced bookings ~$3.0B (+10% YoY); operating capacity +6% YoY; rate $878 vs $828 in 2025. 2027: ~$1.2B advanced bookings (+21% YoY) with operating capacity +13% YoY; rate ~$1,108 for 2027 vs $992 for 2026

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Macro-driven short-term booking softening: after prior call, temporary slowdown mostly in River bookings for 2026 attributed to geopolitical events; management says demand rebounded and cancellation rates remain in historical range
  • Fuel price volatility: higher fuel prices expected to impact results as the year progresses; river mitigated via fixed-price contracts for significant portion of 2026, while ocean has more sensitivity
  • Ocean air-cost and schedule volatility: transatlantic air pricing/routing changes can affect availability/pricing and may be a year headwind (managed via air department and alliance agreements)
  • River demand variability cited by analysts as potential Eastern Med/itinerary exposure risk (management did not quantify Eastern Med exposure; indicated deployment/mix and Egypt impact was slight and largely deployment-driven, with Egypt still expected strong occupancy/yields)

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Topic: 2027 booking curves durability vs “timing/mix” effects: Management explained the curve strength reflects timing and product mix improving both rate and volume; remaining progress depends on remaining inventory and dynamic pricing. If macro stays stable, they reiterated the mid-single-digit yield growth target across core products.
  • Topic: Duration of macro-related booking softening and cancellation behavior: Management described a slight softening after conflict began but emphasized consumer resilience once Viking’s direct mail/promotional marketing generated demand. They stated 2026 is largely sold and 2027 is off to a good start; cancellations are in line with historical trends.
  • Topic: Whether 2027 net yield outcomes could deviate materially vs historical ~2pp band: Management emphasized pricing depends on inventory mix, what’s sold, and what remains; only ~38% booked with >60% capacity left for 2027. They reiterated their general mid-single-digit goal given double-digit capacity growth and historical landing patterns.

Sentiment: POSITIVE

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the VIK Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for VIK.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
No recent 10-K available.
No recent 10-Q available.
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (VIK)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) Financial Profile