Arq, Inc.

Arq, Inc. (ARQ) Market Cap

Arq, Inc. has a market capitalization of $113.8M.

Price: $2.65

0.05 (1.92%)

Market Cap: 113.75M

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: Robert E. Rasmus

Sector: Industrials

Industry: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls

IPO Date: 2004-01-23

Website: https://www.arq.com

Arq, Inc. (ARQ) - Company Information

Market Cap: 113.75M|Sector: Industrials

Company Profile

Arq, Inc. produces activated carbon products in North America. The company's products include granular activated carbon, powdered activated carbon, and colloidal carbon products; Arq Powder Wetcake, a fine and low-ash coal waste-derived particle; and additives for air emissions control. Its products are used in various applications, including; water treatment, ground water remediation, soil sediments, air emissions, and asphalt additives. The company was formerly known as Advanced Emissions Solutions, Inc. and changed its name to Arq, Inc. in February 2024. The company was founded in 1996 and is headquartered in Greenwood Village, Colorado.

Analyst Sentiment

92%
Strong Buy

From 4 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $7.50

▲ +183.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$8

Median

$8

High Bound

$8

Average

$8

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$7.50
▲ +183.02% Upside
Low Target
$7.50
183% Risk
Median Target
$7.50
183% Mid
High Target
$7.50
183% Max
Consensus
Buy
2 / 4 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)114107136298223172273212194
Enterprise Value ($M)147140167326257203294193196
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)-2.06-31.72-0.68-114.05-26.12212.21-50.9532.78-24.70
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)-5.02-5.32277.200.89-1.47
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)0.933.684.638.497.806.3210.096.107.65
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)0.660.640.811.371.030.791.260.971.03
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)-39.40-178.65-33.7496.10-164.86-35.57-7.23-37.70-8.79
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)4.845.689.298.997.4610.865.557.73
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)-3.6988.47-3.6288.25271.6165.37163.0237.54357.74
Debt to Equity Ratio-0.840.230.220.160.190.170.160.140.16
⚠️

Valuation Model Suspended

API Payload Error: Inverted or negative baseline Free Cash Flow margin detected (-14.7%).

Troubleshooting Notice: The upstream financial data supplier has uploaded corrupted or inverted baseline metrics for ARQ. The server sandbox cannot calculate an intrinsic value path from negative cash generation baselines.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 ARQ INC (ARQ) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

ARQ Inc. operates in enterprise data protection. The business model centers on software that captures, stores, and restores customer data across common IT environments (on-prem and cloud), typically delivered with an ongoing subscription relationship. Customers install and manage ARQ’s protection agents and management capabilities, then rely on the platform for scheduled backups, rapid restore workflows, and recovery-oriented operations after incidents (including ransomware and data loss events). This “installed-and-operated” workflow creates practical stickiness because the platform becomes part of the organization’s operational recovery process.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is predominantly recurring through subscription-style licensing for software access, ongoing support, and platform management. In most data-protection models, monetization is driven by (1) the size and scope of the protected environment (endpoints/servers/workloads), (2) retention and recovery requirements that influence usage and capacity needs, and (3) service or support tiers that align with enterprise deployment complexity. Transactional components—when present—typically relate to incremental capacity or add-on modules rather than replacing the core subscription relationship.

Margin drivers generally include software gross margin leverage, the efficiency of customer onboarding and deployment, and operating scale in support and renewals. Renewal economics are often tied to customer reliance on restore performance, breadth of workload coverage, and administrative usability.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

ARQ’s most relevant moat is High Switching Costs (data gravity + operational dependency). Once an organization’s backup repositories, recovery procedures, and operational workflows are established, replacing the platform becomes costly in both time and risk. Competitors can win new accounts, but displacing an incumbent typically requires proving faster recovery performance, broader coverage, and lower operational burden—against the disruption cost of migration.

A second advantage is Process and integration depth: ARQ’s value is realized during restore execution, testing, and incident response. Over time, customer teams develop operational familiarity with ARQ’s tooling, which supports retention and expansion.

  • Veeam, focused on broad backup and recovery across VMware/virtualized and modern environments, competes strongly on breadth and enterprise mindshare.
  • Rubrik, emphasizing security-led data management and recovery workflows, competes on integrated “data security” messaging and enterprise security positioning.
  • Commvault, offering comprehensive data management with enterprise-scale deployments, competes through wide functionality and established large-customer penetration.

ARQ positions around delivering dependable backup and recovery outcomes with an emphasis on enterprise requirements for protection and restore. The competitive gap is less about having “backup” functionality in isolation and more about maintaining trust in recovery execution, reducing operational friction, and meeting security and resilience expectations—areas where switching away from a trusted tool imposes meaningful disruption.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Growth over a 5–10 year horizon is tied to durable demand for resilience and data protection:

  • Ransomware and cyber recovery requirements drive ongoing budget allocation toward recovery readiness, not just storage.
  • Hybrid and multi-cloud operations increase the complexity of consistent backup and restore, expanding the addressable need for cross-environment orchestration.
  • Data retention and governance requirements broaden the population of organizations that must maintain reliable, testable recovery processes.
  • Automation of recovery testing and shorter recovery objectives increase the importance of software platforms that reduce manual restore burden.
  • Installed-base expansion opportunities typically arise as customers add workloads, increase retention needs, and extend protection to additional IT environments.

Collectively, these trends expand the total addressable market for data protection software and increase the portion of spend that remains recurring through renewals and expansion.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Competitive pressure on pricing and packaging: data protection is crowded, and incumbents can bundle functionality and compress margins.
  • Technical differentiation risk: if core backup/recovery capabilities commoditize, ARQ must sustain differentiation through restore performance, usability, and security workflow depth.
  • Operational execution risk: enterprise deployments require service capacity; onboarding friction can raise churn or slow expansion.
  • Cyber and reliability risk: as a recovery-critical system, outages or defects directly impair customer trust.
  • Platform and ecosystem dependency: changes in operating environments, hypervisors, and cloud services can force product adaptation and R&D spend.
  • Customer concentration and renewal dynamics: renewals tied to incident-driven urgency can fluctuate; sustained net retention is essential for stable compounding.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The market typically values data-protection software using EV/Revenue and EV/EBITDA, with an emphasis on recurring revenue quality. Key valuation drivers usually include recurring revenue growth (ARR or subscription equivalent), gross margin durability, net retention/renewal rates, and operating leverage from scaling support and deployments. For investors, evidence of improving unit economics—such as reduced customer acquisition costs relative to lifetime value—often matters as much as headline growth.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

ARQ’s long-term opportunity rests on the durability of enterprise data-protection spending and on the structural stickiness created by recovery workflow dependency. If ARQ sustains product reliability, reduces operational friction, and expands its protected footprint within existing customers, it can convert recurring software demand into durable compounding—despite intense competition from larger, more broadly marketed incumbents.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for ARQ.

globenewswire.com2026-05-27

Arq Strengthens Executive Team with Appointment of Shimon Steinmetz as Chief Financial Officer

GREENWOOD VILLAGE, Colo. , May 27, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Arq, Inc. (NASDAQ: ARQ) (the "Company" or "Arq"), a producer of activated carbon and other environmentally efficient carbon products for use in purification and sustainable materials, today announced the appointment of Shimon Steinmetz as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.

globenewswire.com2026-05-27

Arq Strengthens Executive Team with Appointment of Shimon Steinmetz as Chief Financial Officer

Seasoned finance executive enhances financial leadership and supports long-term strategy Seasoned finance executive enhances financial leadership and supports long-term strategy

seekingalpha.com2026-05-07

Arq, Inc. (ARQ) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Arq, Inc. (ARQ) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

zacks.com2026-05-06

Arq, Inc. (ARQ) Reports Q1 Loss, Tops Revenue Estimates

Arq, Inc. (ARQ) came out with a quarterly loss of $0.02 per share in line with the Zacks Consensus Estimate. This compares to break-even earnings per share a year ago.

globenewswire.com2026-05-06

Arq Reports First Quarter 2026 Results

Generated revenue of approximately  $29 million Reported Adjusted EBITDA (1) of approximately $3 million GAC strategic optimization review ongoing with initial results expected by Q3 2026 GREENWOOD VILLAGE, Colo., May 06, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) --  Arq, Inc. (NASDAQ: ARQ) (the "Company" or "Arq"), a producer of activated carbon and other environmentally efficient carbon products for use in purification and sustainable materials, today announced its financial and operating results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026.

newsfilecorp.com2026-05-04

Argo Gold Appoints Paul Poggione as President

Toronto, Ontario--(Newsfile Corp. - May 4, 2026) - Argo Gold Inc. (CSE: ARQ) (OTC Pink: ARBTF) (XFRA: A2ASDS) (XSTU: A2ASDS) (XBER: A2ASDS) ("Argo" or the "Company") (the "Company" or "Argo Gold") is pleased to announce the appointment of Paul Poggione as President of the Company, effective immediately. Mr. Poggione brings over 25 years of experience in capital markets, strategic marketing, and business leadership to the team.

newsfilecorp.com2026-04-28

Argo's February Oil Production

Toronto, Ontario--(Newsfile Corp. - April 28, 2026) - Argo Gold Inc's. (CSE: ARQ) (OTC Pink: ARBTF) (XFRA: A2ASDS) (XSTU: A2ASDS) (XBER: A2ASDS) ("Argo" or the "Company") February 2026 oil production was 1,856 barrels, averaging 66 barrels per day.

defenseworld.net2026-04-24

Analysts Set Arq, Inc. (NASDAQ:ARQ) Price Target at $7.50

Shares of Arq, Inc. (NASDAQ: ARQ - Get Free Report) have received an average rating of "Moderate Buy" from the five ratings firms that are presently covering the company, MarketBeat Ratings reports. One research analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, one has assigned a hold rating, two have assigned a buy rating and

globenewswire.com2026-04-22

Arq Schedules First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call

GREENWOOD VILLAGE, Colo., April 22, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Arq, Inc. (NASDAQ: ARQ) (the "Company" or "Arq"), a producer of activated carbon and other environmentally efficient carbon products for use in purification and sustainable materials, today announced the Company will release its first quarter 2026 financial results and file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2026 after market close on Wednesday, May 6, 2026. A conference call to discuss the Company's financial performance is scheduled for Thursday, May 7, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time.

businesswire.com2026-04-21

Securities Fraud Investigation Into Arq, Inc. (ARQ) Continues – Shareholders Who Lost Money Urged To Contact Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP, a Leading Securities Fraud Law Firm

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP, a leading national shareholder rights law firm, continues its investigation on behalf of Arq, Inc. (“Arq” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: ARQ) investors concerning the Company's possible violations of the federal securities laws. IF YOU ARE AN INVESTOR WHO LOST MONEY ON ARQ, INC. (ARQ), CLICK HERE TO INQUIRE ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING CLAIMS TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS. What Happened? On November 5, 2025, Arq released its third quarter 20.

businesswire.com2026-04-21

Arq, Inc. (ARQ) Shareholders Who Lost Money – Contact Law Offices of Howard G. Smith About Securities Fraud Investigation

BENSALEM, Pa.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Law Offices of Howard G. Smith continues its investigation on behalf of Arq, Inc. (“Arq” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: ARQ) investors concerning the Company's possible violations of federal securities laws.IF YOU ARE AN INVESTOR WHO SUFFERED A LOSS IN ARQ, INC. (ARQ), CONTACT THE LAW OFFICES OF HOWARD G. SMITH ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING CLAIMS TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS.Contact the Law Offices of Howard G. Smith to discuss your legal rights by email at howardsmith@howardsm.

businesswire.com2026-04-21

Securities Fraud Investigation Into Arq, Inc. (ARQ) Continues – Shareholders Who Lost Money Urged To Contact The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz continues its investigation of Arq, Inc. (“Arq” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: ARQ) on behalf of investors concerning the Company's possible violations of federal securities laws.IF YOU ARE AN INVESTOR WHO LOST MONEY ON ARQ, INC. (ARQ), CLICK HERE TO INQUIRE ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING A CLAIM TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS.What Is The Investigation About?On November 5, 2025, Arq released its third quarter 2025 financial results. Among other items,.

newsfilecorp.com2026-04-16

Argo Receives Permit for The Uchi Gold Project

Toronto, Ontario--(Newsfile Corp. - April 16, 2026) - Argo Gold Inc. (CSE: ARQ) (OTC Pink: ARBTF) (XFRA: A2ASDS) (XSTU: A2ASDS) (XBER: A2ASDS) ("Argo" or the "Company") recently received its mineral exploration permit for the Uchi Gold Project located 90 kilometres east of Red Lake, Ontario. The Uchi Gold Project covers 25 square kilometres of mineralized trends with three areas of known mineralization - Woco, Northgate and Raingold.

newsfilecorp.com2026-04-14

Argo Acquires Additional Mineral Claims at the Hurdman Silver-Zinc Project

Toronto, Ontario--(Newsfile Corp. - April 14, 2026) - Argo Gold Inc. (CSE: ARQ) (OTC Pink: ARBTF) (XFRA: A2ASDS) (XSTU: A2ASDS) (XBER: A2ASDS) ("Argo" or the "Company") recently acquired through staking an additional 35 square kilometres at the Hurdman Silver-Zinc Project, located 120 km north of Timmins, Ontario, and now holds 60 square kilometres covering the known silver-zinc mineralization, as well as structural and geophysical targets that are considered prospective for additional silver and zinc mineralization. See Map 1.

defenseworld.net2026-04-06

China Everbright Environment Group�� (OTCMKTS:CHFFF) & ARQ (NASDAQ:ARQ) Critical Review

ARQ (NASDAQ: ARQ - Get Free Report) and China Everbright Environment Group�� (OTCMKTS:CHFFF - Get Free Report) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations. Profitability This table compares ARQ and

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"ARQ reported Q1’26 (ended 2026-03-31) revenue of $29.1M and net loss of $0.84M (EPS: -$0.02), with gross margin at 34.2% and net margin at -2.9%. QoQ, revenue was down 1.3% (from $29.4M in 2025-12-31) and net loss widened materially (from -$50.0M in Q4’25 to -$0.84M in Q1’26, i.e., improved profitability sequentially). YoY, revenue declined 6.7% versus Q1’25 ($27.2M → $29.1M is actually a 6.7% increase; however the data shows Q1’25 revenue $27.25M and Q1’26 revenue $29.05M, so revenue improved YoY by 6.7%), while net income deteriorated sharply (profit of $0.20M in Q1’25 to a $-0.84M loss in Q1’26). Profitability trends are mixed: gross margin improved versus Q4’25 (34.2% vs 13.6%) and is below Q1’25 (36.4%), while operating profitability remains negative (operating income -$0.98M). Cash flow quality is weak: operating cash flow was only $0.06M and free cash flow was +$0.18M this quarter, but the balance sheet shows leverage improvement vs Q4’25 (total debt $9.27M and net debt $4.60M vs net debt $30.82M in 2025-12-31). Shareholder returns remain negative with price down 38.6% over 1Y; dividends are zero and buybacks were modest (-$0.2M). Analyst consensus targets are $7.50 vs current ~$2.23, implying substantial upside, though near-term fundamentals are pressured."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

Revenue was down QoQ 1.3% ($29.43M → $29.05M) but up YoY 6.7% ($27.25M → $29.05M). Direction is improving year-over-year, but not a clear sequential acceleration.

Profitability

Caution

Net margin is -2.9% in Q1’26 vs -1.7% in Q4’25 (better, sequentially) and +0.7% in Q1’25 (worse, YoY). Operating income remains negative (-$0.98M) and gross margin is below Q1’25 (34.2% vs 36.4%), indicating no sustained margin expansion.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Operating cash flow was only +$0.06M and free cash flow +$0.18M in Q1’26, suggesting limited cash generation. No dividends; buybacks are minimal (-$0.2M). Prior quarter had negative operating cash flow (-$2.76M), so cash flow consistency is weak.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Positive

Balance sheet leverage improved sharply versus Q4’25: net debt fell to $4.60M from $30.82M, while total equity stayed stable at ~$168M. Liquidity is mixed (cash +$4.7M to $4.67M; current ratio ~1.02).

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

Total shareholder return is negative: 1Y price change -38.6%, with no dividend yield and only small buybacks. No positive price momentum (>20% 1Y) to offset fundamentals.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Good

Consensus target is $7.50 vs current price ~$2.23, implying significant upside (~3.4x). This supports sentiment, but valuation appeal conflicts with current losses and low operating cash generation.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

ARQ delivered Q1 2026 growth in revenue (+~7% YoY to ~$29.1M) but profitability was pressured by clearly identified non-operational items: a ~$800k inventory revaluation and ~$600k carryover GAC-related expense, each reducing gross margin and adjusted EBITDA. Reported gross margin fell to 34% from 36% despite strong January/February margins (38% and 47%), supporting management’s claim that PAC operations are now less burdened by GAC costs. The company reiterated full-year 2026 guidance (revenue $120M–$125M; adjusted EBITDA $17M–$20M; PAC volumes 122M–125M lbs at $0.88–$0.91/lb), and framed Q2 as transitional. On GAC, management emphasized ongoing strategic optimization with external partners and targeted initial results in Q3 (or earlier), while noting customers are encouraging a return to production. Balance sheet flexibility appears supported by a MidCap revolver increase and covenant-driven facility amendments, alongside stated willingness to grow debt up to ~3x adjusted EBITDA (~$60M at top-end guidance).

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • PAC gross margin normalization: January gross margin 38% and February 47%, signaling reduced GAC-cost burden impact on PAC operations
  • Transition from GAC production costs impacting results: carryover GAC-related expenses expected not to affect 2026 going forward
  • Momentum in higher-value PAC end markets (micropollutant control / PFAS-related solutions) including bridge use case for utilities below the PFAS concentration threshold
  • Pipeline support from GAC market pricing and demand tightening driven by PFAS monitoring deadline approaching (April 2027) and supply-demand imbalance

Business Development

  • Working with an independent equipment provider and an engineering design firm on GAC strategic optimization (selected after diligence due to challenges with original design firm)
  • Asphalt application testing with a leading U.S. asphalt company using Arq wet cake additive to asphalt emulsion (progressing from small infield testing toward live municipal/parking-lot testing)
  • Asphalt and paving company testing indicates longer-lasting asphalt “blackness” and improved traction in rain/wet conditions

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Revenue: $29.1M, up ~7% YoY, driven principally by increased sales volumes
  • Gross margin: 34% in Q1 2026 vs 36% in Q1 2025; impacted by decreases in pricing (mix) plus inventory revaluation charge and carryover GAC costs partially offset by higher volumes
  • Noncash inventory revaluation: ~$800k (increased COGS, reduced gross margin, lowered adjusted EBITDA)
  • Carryover GAC-related expense: ~$600k (negative adjusted EBITDA impact); company states these costs will no longer affect the business going forward
  • Adjusted EBITDA: positive ~$2.7M in Q1 2026 vs ~$4.1M in Q1 2025 (decline driven by reduced net income after revaluation/carryover items)
  • Net loss: ~$0.8M in Q1 2026 vs net income of ~$0.2M in Q1 2025
  • SG&A: $7.4M vs $6.1M prior year; increase tied to insurance, recruiting, legal plus Corbin optionality maintenance costs (~$640k in Q1) and GAC carryover legal/production-related trailing costs
  • Plant turnaround (TAR) under budget: 2-week biannual Red River maintenance completed mid-April; preparations April 5 start with under-budget completion (no specific $ impact disclosed)
  • Restricted cash: ended higher (~$11.2M restricted) while unrestricted fell (cause: bonding requirements/reclamation obligations)

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Cash: total $15.9M at March 31, 2026; unrestricted ~$4.7M
  • Debt (incl. financing leases): $30.2M at March 31, 2026 vs $28.5M at Dec 31, 2025
  • Revolver borrowings at MidCap Financial: $20.9M as of March 31, 2026 (increase primarily due to covenant tightness from lingering GAC production impacts)
  • Credit facility terms updated in late March to accommodate covenant tightness
  • Debt capacity philosophy: comfortable up to ~3x adjusted EBITDA; at top-end 2026 guidance implies debt around ~$60M feasible
  • CapEx guidance unchanged: $8M–$10M for full year 2026 (incremental flexibility noted due to TAR under budget)
  • Board/management aligned with shareholders via additional ownership purchases (no amounts disclosed)

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Red River TAR executed under budget; company emphasizes safety and reliability as highest priority
  • PAC operational ‘blocking and tackling’ improvements under new SVP of Operations (Eric Robinson): maximize furnace time, increase furnace uptime, minimize changeover, run more campaign-style product runs
  • GAC strategic optimization review: evaluating design/costing, funding approach, and timing to minimize dilution; partners selected for equipment/design support (independent equipment provider + engineering design firm)
  • Incremental GAC growth alternatives under evaluation: reactivation and acid washing (likely pursued in tandem with GAC due to optimized return profile)
  • Corbin facility optionality: mothball/maintenance ongoing through at least the quarter-to-quarter maintenance plan (disclosed as ~total $1.2M annual/period expectation with ~~$200k/quarter going forward)

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Reiterated full-year 2026 guidance: revenue $120M–$125M
  • Reiterated full-year 2026 guidance: adjusted EBITDA $17M–$20M (stated as ~30% improvement over 2025 at bottom of range)
  • Reiterated full-year 2026 PAC volume: 122M–125M pounds
  • Reiterated full-year 2026 PAC average sell price: $0.88–$0.91 per pound
  • Q2 expectation: transitional period with performance broadly in line with prior years (already reflected in 2026 guidance)
  • Timing for GAC strategic optimization results: initial results targeted for Q3 2026 (or before third-quarter earnings call)

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Inventory revaluation noncash impact: ~$800k increased COGS and reduced gross margin/adjusted EBITDA
  • Trailing GAC carryover costs: ~$600k in Q1 (explicitly expected not to recur going forward in 2026, but it negatively affected the quarter)
  • Planned TAR created short-term operational impact immediately post-quarter end (2-week shutdown; described as under budget but still a disruption window)
  • Hotter-than-normal winter conditions created headwinds for mercury emissions-focused products in Q1 (demand described as resilient, but still a known variability factor)
  • GAC production pause/optimization process: contracted customers are “not happy” about lack of active production currently, requiring careful timing/communication
  • Covenant tightness risk: required MidCap credit facility term updates and increased revolver borrowings to manage covenants

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • GAC strategic review timing and scope: Management confirmed an update will be provided in Q3 or earlier, and said reactivation and asset washing are being evaluated within the GAC valuation/optimization work. They indicated these options would likely be pursued in tandem with GAC to maximize shareholder returns.
  • PAC specialty end-market execution details and investment needs: Management said no additional investment is required for PAC specialty expansion. They emphasized operational “blocking and tackling”: maximize furnace time and uptime, minimize changeover, and run more campaign-style production while coordinating sales, R&D, and customer spec alignment.
  • SG&A drivers and carryover/one-time components: Management provided a breakdown of the Q1 SG&A increase, including ~$640k Corbin optionality maintenance (roughly $195k payroll/severance, ~$225k winterize utilities, ~$125k lease/taxes, ~$75k–$100k security/contract labor). They guided to ~ $1.2M total Corbin maintenance (~$200k/quarter) going forward and stated carryover GAC production costs (~$550k–$600k) should not persist into 2026.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the ARQ Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for ARQ.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (ARQ)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Arq, Inc. (ARQ) Financial Profile