Badger Meter, Inc.

Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) Market Cap

Badger Meter, Inc. has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Kenneth C. Bockhorst

Sector: Industrials

Industry: Industrial - Machinery

IPO Date: 1983-10-27

Website: https://www.badgermeter.com

Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Industrials

Company Profile

Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) provides a comprehensive range of solutions for flow measurement, quality assessment, control, and communication. Operating globally, the company serves markets across North America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. For municipal water utilities, BMI supplies both conventional and advanced water meters, complemented by associated radio, software, and service technologies. Additionally, Badger Meter engineers and produces a variety of flow instrumentation devices, including meters, valves, and sensing tools. These instruments are vital for measuring and controlling the flow of various substances—from water, air, and steam to oil and other liquids and gases—within industrial piping and pipelines. They are incorporated by original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) as primary measurement components within their products or systems and distributed through manufacturer representatives. Key applications for this instrumentation span water/wastewater treatment, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems, and corporate sustainability efforts. The company further innovates with its ORION suite of automatic meter reading (AMR) technologies, encompassing ORION Migratable, ORION (SE) for traditional fixed networks, and ORION Cellular for infrastructure-free fixed network solutions. Its BEACON advanced metering analytics platform, a secure cloud-hosted software, empowers users with alerts for specified conditions and consumer engagement tools to visualize and manage water usage. Serving a broad customer base, including water utilities, industrial clients, and other sectors, Badger Meter sells its offerings directly and through a network of resellers and representatives. Founded in 1905, Badger Meter, Inc. is headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Analyst Sentiment

67%
Buy

From 14 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $153.20

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$112

Median

$162

High Bound

$167

Average

$153

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$153.20
▲ +14.03% Upside
Low Target
$112.00
-17% Risk
Median Target
$162.00
21% Mid
High Target
$167.00
24% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 BADGER METER INC (BMI) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Badger Meter designs and manufactures flow measurement products and related systems used primarily in two end-markets: (1) water utilities and (2) industrial process applications. The value proposition is straightforward—accurate, reliable measurement of water and other flows enables utilities to improve billing integrity, manage non-revenue water, meet regulatory reporting requirements, and support operational control. In industrial settings, metering supports process efficiency, compliance, and asset management. The business model is supported by an installed base dynamic. Once devices and telemetry ecosystems are deployed across a utility or industrial site, replacement is not purely “per unit.” Customers typically face system integration, qualification, and operational downtime considerations, which creates stickiness and supports a sustained after-market flow of service, parts, and upgrades.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Badger Meter monetizes through a blend of equipment sales and recurring/after-market support:
  • Product revenue (transactional): meters, registers, transmitters, and related flow measurement hardware sold to utilities and industrial customers.
  • Systems & project revenue: deployment of metering/telemetry solutions where integration and configuration are part of the customer requirement.
  • Recurring revenue components (installed-base driven): service, replacement parts, and upgrades that follow the long life cycle of installed meters and associated communications/reading infrastructure.
Margin drivers typically include the mix between new equipment versus installed-base revenue, product cost structure (components, manufacturing efficiency), and the degree of software/telemetry enablement embedded in deployed solutions. Over time, installed-base servicing and upgrades can support steadier demand than greenfield unit volume alone.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Badger Meter’s most durable moat is high switching costs anchored in an installed base, reinforced by field-proven reliability and utility/industrial qualification processes.
  • Switching costs: Utilities often operate large, multi-year metering programs with established meter compatibility requirements, communication/read workflows, and integration into billing/asset management systems. Replacing metering infrastructure can require qualification testing, systems engineering effort, and operational disruption.
  • Installed-base depth: Meter lifetimes and replacement cycles create a long runway for after-market parts and upgrades.
  • Reliability and compliance: Accurate measurement and dependable operation are prerequisites in regulated or contract-driven environments where downtime and billing errors have tangible consequences.
Competitive benchmarking (primary peers):
  • Mueller Water Products (water and flow measurement for utilities): Competes across water infrastructure and measurement hardware. BMI’s differentiation tends to center on long-cycle installed-base relationships and telemetry-readiness within utility deployments.
  • Itron (metering and smart metering solutions): Strong in advanced metering ecosystems for utilities. BMI competes on flow measurement specialization and installed-base conversion/upgrade pathways rather than attempting to replicate the broadest smart-city software platform footprint.
  • Emerson (industrial instrumentation/measurement): Provides measurement and automation solutions in industrial processes. BMI competes more directly on flow metering products and site-level measurement needs, where installed measurement systems and integration constraints influence purchasing behavior.
Industry focus vs. rivals: While peers may span broader “smart” platforms or wider industrial automation suites, BMI’s competitive posture is anchored in flow measurement credibility and customer stickiness from deployed metering infrastructure.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, BMI’s addressable opportunity is supported by secular demand for measurement, monitoring, and modernization:
  • Water infrastructure renewal: Aging municipal assets drive replacement of meters and supporting measurement equipment.
  • Non-revenue water and leakage mitigation: Better metering accuracy and remote reads support operational initiatives to reduce unaccounted-for water.
  • Remote monitoring and improved billing integrity: Telemetry-enabled metering supports reduced manual reads and more consistent billing.
  • Industrial process measurement needs: Industrial customers require accurate flow measurement for operational efficiency, process control, and compliance, supporting ongoing replacement and upgrade demand.
  • Upgrades to deployed systems: A portion of total demand can be “installed-base expansion,” where new capabilities are layered onto existing customer programs rather than requiring full infrastructure replacement.
These drivers collectively expand TAM in municipal and industrial measurement markets while also supporting a recurring component tied to the longevity of installed meters.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Utility budget and procurement cycles: Metering and infrastructure programs can be delayed by funding constraints, affecting equipment pacing.
  • Technology and standards evolution: Advances in communications, interoperability expectations, or measurement requirements can pressure product roadmaps and qualification timelines.
  • Competitive pricing pressure: Increased competition can compress margins, particularly in hardware-centric portions of the order mix.
  • Cybersecurity and data integrity in telemetry ecosystems: As connected metering expands, security requirements and resilience expectations can rise.
  • Supply chain and component sourcing: Flow measurement programs depend on specialized components; disruptions can impact lead times and costs.
  • Concentration of large customer programs: Larger multi-year deployments can create lumpiness in revenue and working capital tied to project milestones.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Markets typically value companies in this sector using a blend of EV/EBITDA and P/S, with the key variables being (1) sustainable growth tied to installed-base expansion, (2) gross margin quality, and (3) the durability of service/after-market revenue. Valuation sensitivity generally increases when investors expect a higher share of recurring or upgrade revenue and stronger conversion of installed base to more advanced telemetry/read capabilities. Key drivers that move valuation frameworks include:
  • Installed-base monetization: Evidence that replacement and upgrades translate into proportionally steadier revenue.
  • Margin sustainability: Mix shifts toward higher-value system components and improved manufacturing efficiency.
  • Order visibility and backlog quality: While outcomes remain variable by program, consistent demand patterns reduce perceived cyclicality.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Badger Meter is positioned in a structurally attractive segment of the infrastructure value chain where measurement accuracy, reliability, and integration into existing systems drive high switching costs. The installed-base dynamic supports a durable pathway for parts, service, and upgrades alongside new meter deployments. The long-term thesis depends on continued water and industrial modernization demand, while managing risks tied to utility funding cycles, evolving communications standards, and competitive pricing pressure.

⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-06-30

"Headline (2026-06-30, Q2): Revenue $222.3M, Net Income $29.7M, EPS $1.02. QoQ (vs 2026-03-31): Revenue +10.0%, Net Income +8.7%, EPS +8.5%. YoY (vs 2025-06-30): Revenue -6.6%, Net Income -14.1%, EPS -13.6%. Profitability improved sequentially but weakened year-over-year. Gross margin eased slightly (Q2 40.8% vs Q1 41.7%) while operating margin increased (17.7% vs 17.4%) and net margin edged down marginally (13.37% vs 13.51%). Over the trailing year, margins show a mild compression versus mid-2025 (net margin 14.5% in Q2’25 vs 13.4% in Q2’26), consistent with the decline in YoY net income. Cash flow remains positive but quality is mixed: operating cash flow was $18.8M in Q2 (down sharply from $33.9M in Q1) and free cash flow was $18.8M. The quarter used cash for financing via buybacks (-$25.3M) and dividends (-$11.6M), while investing included a large acquisition outflow (-$94.4M), driving a net cash decrease (-$142.8M). Balance sheet resilience is strong with zero debt and very high equity (total stockholders’ equity $809.6M) and net cash (net debt -$95.7M). Total shareholder return is modestly negative given the stock’s -37.2% 1-year change and low dividend yield (~0.27%); no high-momentum tailwind is present. Analyst price targets (consensus ~$163) are above the current price (~$115.5), implying upside versus Street expectations."

Revenue Growth

Caution

QoQ revenue growth of +10.0% (Q1 $202.3M to Q2 $222.3M), but YoY revenue declined -6.6% (Q2’25 $238.1M to Q2’26 $222.3M).

Profitability

Fair

Sequentially operating profitability improved (operating margin 17.7% vs 17.4%; net margin 13.37% vs 13.51% slightly down). YoY profitability weakened materially: net income -14.1% and net margin compressed from 14.5% (Q2’25) to 13.4% (Q2’26).

Cash Flow Quality

Caution

Positive operating cash flow ($18.8M) and free cash flow ($18.8M), but down vs Q1 ($33.9M). Heavy investing cash outflow from acquisitions (-$94.4M) and equity returns via buybacks/dividends reduce cash each quarter.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Good

No short-term or long-term debt; strong equity base ($809.6M) and net cash position (net debt -$95.7M). Liquidity remains adequate (current ratio ~2.42).

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

Capital appreciation is weak: 1Y price change -37.2%. Dividend yield is low (~0.27%), partially offset by buybacks (-$25.3M in the quarter).

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Fair

Street consensus target (~$163.33) is above the current price (~$115.54), suggesting implied upside; however valuation multiples remain elevated (e.g., P/E ~36x in Q2).

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

BMI’s Q2 2026 results show a modest sequential improvement masking ongoing YoY volume/mix pressure. Total sales fell 7% YoY to $222.3M, with base sales down 7.5% excluding the ~$2M two-month UDlive benefit, yet base revenue rose 9% vs Q1 as awarded AMI projects started initial shipment ramping (PRASA shipments began). Profitability weakened: operating margins down 110 bps to 17.7% and gross margin down 30 bps to 40.8%, attributed mainly to lower sales volumes and project mix. Management reiterated a full-year organic “flattish” outlook vs 2025 excluding UDlive, relying on sequential base-quarter improvement and Q4 being the easiest YoY comp. Margin headwind risk centers on broad electronic component cost and availability pressures tied to AI/data-center build-out, but management believes structural mix and pricing excellence keep results within the normalized range. Cash generation also deteriorated (FCF $21.9M) due to working capital build and lower earnings; however, the $150M credit facility remains undrawn and repurchases continue.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Sequentially improved sales in Q2 as previously awarded AMI projects began initial shipment ramping
  • Modest increase in short-term order rates and improvement in short-cycle order activity vs Q1
  • Flow instrumentation product line up 6% YoY on broad-based water application demand
  • PRASA project product shipments began (initial deployment ramp activity supporting later-quarter base revenue improvement)

Business Development

  • PRASA (Puerto Rico) AMI project: shipments began; management said nothing has changed on likelihood despite public legal/process activity
  • AWWA ACE 2026 (Washington, D.C.) customer/consultant engagement highlighting NaaS adoption and hardware/software interest

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Total Q2 sales $222.3M, down 7% YoY; base sales down 7.5% YoY excluding ~ $2M two-month UDlive benefit
  • Base sales up 9% vs Q1 (sequential improvement driven by awarded project shipment ramps)
  • Margins: overall operating margins down 110 bps to 17.7% YoY; base operating margin (ex UDlive) down 40 bps to 18.4%
  • Gross margin 40.8%, down 30 bps YoY (mix/volume impacts); still upper-half of normalized range indicating pricing/mix resilience
  • Tax: effective income tax rate 25.2% vs 24.5% prior year (up 70 bps)
  • EPS: diluted EPS $1.02, down 13% from $1.17
  • Working capital: primary working capital as % of sales 22.9% vs 20.0% prior quarter end (up 290 bps), mainly from receivable timing and higher inventory
  • Free cash flow $21.9M vs $40.6M prior-year comparable quarter (lower earnings + temporary working capital increases)

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Share repurchases: 204,000 shares for $25.3M in Q2
  • Remaining repurchase authorization: ~$90M
  • Total deployed over prior three quarters: roughly $80M
  • Credit facility: finalized five-year renewal of $150M credit facility; undrawn, provides financial flexibility with expansion feature

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Managing electronic component cost and availability pressures attributed to AI/data-center build-out demand; mitigation to date but challenges not easing
  • Spending discipline: Q2 S,G&A $51.4M, down $1.6M YoY via spending controls, lower incentive comp, and cost containment; partially offset by UDlive addition ($1.8M for two months incl. intangible amortization) and remaining transaction costs ($1.2M)
  • UDlive modeling note: preliminary UDlive intangible amortization expected ~$5M annually (included within ongoing SCA run rate); transaction costs were separate

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Full-year 2026 organic revenue (excluding UDlive) expected to be roughly flattish vs 2025; management expects improving sequential base quarterly revenue dollars through the year
  • Guidance mechanics: Q4 is easiest YoY comparison; base sales YoY growth rate expected to be heavily weighted to Q4
  • Q3: management expects sequential growth again in Q3 over Q2, but did not provide specific quarterly guidance sizes
  • Risk framing: cohort of nine awarded projects described as 'pretty solid' at mid-year; management indicated uneven ramping but believed enough air cover to manage variability

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Electronic component cost/availability pressures (broad-based electronics; includes capacitors, circuit boards/bare boards, memory chips, etc.) impacting electronics-enabled products (ORION Cellular, ultrasonic products, beyond-the-meter technologies)
  • Project pacing/ramp unevenness across turnkey vs supply-only deployments; implausible to predict exact timing and full run-rate quarterly peaks
  • PRASA legal/process uncertainty: management still expects winning/procurement fairness stance unchanged, but acknowledged government-bidding/procurement appeals are common and could introduce volatility
  • Working capital pressure: receivable timing and inventory build (including UDlive inventory and year-to-date revenue pacing/supply appearing earlier)

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Project ramp visibility & slip risk: Management explained that nine awarded projects feel 'pretty solid' at this point, with uneven phase-ins and multiple deployment pieces. They emphasized improved order rates vs Q1, and said they don’t expect all projects to begin shipping simultaneously, reducing slip likelihood.
  • Electronics cost/availability impact on gross margin & pricing: Management framed the issue as a cost component dynamic plus availability, not product-specific collapse. They reiterated structural mix/pricing excellence supports normalized gross margin range, and confirmed contractual pass-through/escalations are negotiated in many 3–5 year deployments.
  • UDlive earnings bridge mechanics: Management clarified SCA dollars included two parts: ongoing UDlive run-rate of $1.8M in the quarter that includes intangible amortization, plus separate remaining transaction costs of $1.2M. They stated the ongoing run-rate should be modeled, while transaction costs are non-recurring.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the BMI Q2 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) Financial Profile