HighPeak Energy, Inc.

HighPeak Energy, Inc. (HPK) Market Cap

HighPeak Energy, Inc. has a market capitalization of $955.3M.

Price: $7.56

-0.74 (-8.92%)

Market Cap: 955.27M

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: Michael L. Hollis

Sector: Energy

Industry: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

IPO Date: 2018-05-29

Website: https://www.highpeakenergy.com

HighPeak Energy, Inc. (HPK) - Company Information

Market Cap: 955.27M|Sector: Energy

Company Profile

HighPeak Energy, Inc., an independent oil and natural gas company, engages in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids reserves in the Midland Basin in West Texas. As of December 31, 2021, the company had approximately 64,213 MBoe of proved reserves. HighPeak Energy, Inc. was incorporated in 2019 and is headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas.

Analyst Sentiment

52%
Hold

From 2 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $12.00

▲ +58.7% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$12

Median

$12

High Bound

$12

Average

$12

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$12.00
▲ +58.73% Upside
Low Target
$12.00
59% Risk
Median Target
$12.00
59% Mid
High Target
$12.00
59% Max
Consensus
Buy
3 / 4 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)9558645948821,2151,5691,8421,7351,757
Enterprise Value ($M)2,0481,9571,6251,9112,2212,4212,6852,5542,579
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)-6.54-1.70-5.89-12.0311.6010.7951.268.6914.78
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)-0.061.12
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)1.244.003.584.676.066.097.846.396.38
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)0.650.590.370.540.730.961.151.081.12
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)-56.34-14.37-351.3328.3987.96652.28-322.0284.2563.67
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)9.069.8010.1211.099.4111.439.409.37
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)3.8813.1017.2116.6513.1112.7117.2210.5312.13
Debt to Equity Ratio2.070.810.750.730.620.550.580.590.62
⚠️

Valuation Model Suspended

API Payload Error: Inverted or negative baseline Free Cash Flow margin detected (-22.2%).

Troubleshooting Notice: The upstream financial data supplier has uploaded corrupted or inverted baseline metrics for HPK. The server sandbox cannot calculate an intrinsic value path from negative cash generation baselines.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 HIGHPEAK ENERGY INC (HPK) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

HIGHPEAK ENERGY INC operates as an upstream natural gas and oil producer, converting subsurface resource value into cash flows by developing drilling locations within its operated acreage and producing wells through the full cycle of gathering, processing, and transportation to market.

The value chain is centered on (1) land acquisition and lease economics, (2) drilling and completion execution to maximize well performance and recovery, (3) gathering and transportation access that reduces realized-price differentials versus benchmark commodities, and (4) disciplined capital allocation tied to inventory quality and service-cost conditions. Customer stickiness is not the model; instead, repeatability comes from inventory depth, operating expertise, and access to low-cost infrastructure.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is primarily driven by the sale of produced hydrocarbons—natural gas and crude oil—with pricing linked to North American commodity benchmarks and adjusted by location and quality differentials (e.g., basis, transportation charges, and product specs).

Margin drivers are typically split across:

  • Realized commodity price (affected by basis differentials and takeaway/processing constraints).
  • Lease operating expense (LOE) and workover intensity (a function of well integrity, location mix, and operating practices).
  • Production volumes and decline management (refracturing/recompletion and inventory cadence determine sustaining capital needs).
  • Midstream/transport costs where gathering and processing are internalized or contractually optimized.

Monetisation is largely transactional per barrel/Mcf produced, but economic durability depends on the ability to sustain production through an inventory of high-return drilling and well optimization opportunities.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

HIGHPEAK’s competitive positioning is most defensible when it combines geographic cost advantage (access to low-cost supply regions and infrastructure) with execution-based cost competitiveness (repeatable drilling/completion performance) and logistical infrastructure (gathering and transportation that minimizes basis differentials).

Moat framing (how competitors struggle to replicate it):

  • Low-cost feedstock & proximity to demand/transport: In North American gas basins, realized pricing is heavily influenced by ability to route production to takeaway and processing capacity. Geographic proximity and contract positioning can reduce differentials versus peers.
  • Infrastructure-linked economics: Where gathering systems, processing access, or contracted transportation reduce effective costs per unit, rivals must either match infrastructure terms or acquire similar acreage with comparable access—often capital- and time-intensive.
  • Acreage and inventory quality: High-utility drilling inventory and demonstrated well performance create a compounding advantage—better well results lower required capital per unit of sustained production.

Competitive benchmarking:

  • EQT Corporation — Large-scale operator with extensive Marcellus/Utica holdings and infrastructure; competes on scale and integrated midstream positioning. HIGHPEAK competes more selectively through targeted acreage and capital discipline rather than broad system coverage.
  • Range Resources — Active producer with significant Appalachian exposure and established development programs; competes via drilling inventory breadth and service procurement strength. HIGHPEAK differentiates through specific geographic/operational focus and cost control rather than basin-wide scale.
  • Southwestern Energy — Another major Appalachian natural gas participant; competes through operational efficiency and drilling/completion execution. HIGHPEAK’s relative edge depends on replicating well performance and sustaining economics through inventory selectivity and basis management.

Across these rivals, the fundamental contest is not “product differentiation,” but cost per unit, realized price capture, and inventory quality. HIGHPEAK’s market position is strongest when its acreage and logistics translate into structural unit economics that remain favorable through commodity cycles.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, growth is shaped by the interaction of drilling inventory development and industry structure for North American gas:

  • Inventory monetisation in liquids-rich and gas-constrained pockets: Where acreage contains durable drilling locations and can sustain development with manageable breakevens, production scaling becomes a function of capital allocation and execution quality.
  • Operational learning curves: Repeatable drilling and completion designs, improved wellbore targeting, and workover optimization can raise recovery factors and lower per-unit costs.
  • Midstream and takeaway alignment: Basin-level transport and processing constraints can create localized differentials. Continued infrastructure build-out and improved contracting can improve realized prices and reduce effective costs.
  • Capital discipline as a growth enabler: In upstream, the “growth driver” is often maintaining returns while rotating drilling capital across the best-performing inventory, protecting balance sheet flexibility for sustained development.
  • Long-term North American gas demand: Industrial and power generation needs, plus substitution effects, support basin-level drilling intensity—though timing depends on commodity cycles and infrastructure expansions.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Commodity price and basis risk: Realized economics can be pressured by benchmark volatility and by changes in local transportation/processing availability that widen differentials.
  • Execution risk: Well performance variability, longer-than-planned time to production, and higher-than-budgeted completion or workover costs can impair expected returns.
  • Regulatory and environmental exposure: Permitting, methane requirements, water handling, and emissions enforcement can increase operating and capital costs.
  • Capital intensity and service-cost inflation: Upstream development depends on drilling/completion execution and availability of rigs, labor, and materials; cost spikes can compress margins.
  • Operational concentration: Basin or region concentration increases correlation of results with localized infrastructure constraints, geological performance, and local regulatory posture.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Markets typically value upstream E&P producers using frameworks such as EV/EBITDA, cash flow yield, and reserve/production-based metrics (e.g., enterprise value per unit of proved reserves or per flowing production volume). For investors, the valuation debate usually centers on:

  • Durability of unit economics (LOE and sustaining capital requirements, not just headline production growth).
  • Quality and timing of inventory (how much production can be supported at attractive returns).
  • Realized price outlook driven by basis and logistics.
  • Balance sheet risk and capital flexibility across commodity cycles.

Multiple expansion is generally more plausible when investors perceive structural improvements in cost capture and inventory quality; downside can occur when basis, decline rates, or sustaining capital requirements worsen relative to expectations.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

HIGHPEAK ENERGY INC is best analyzed as a cost-and-logistics-driven upstream operator in North American gas markets. The core long-term thesis rests on the ability to convert advantaged acreage and infrastructure proximity into repeatable unit economics: capturing realized price efficiently through transportation/processing access while maintaining competitive LOE and sustaining capital needs through high-quality inventory and disciplined execution. The investment case strengthens when these drivers remain resilient through commodity cycles and infrastructure constraints.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for HPK.

seekingalpha.com2026-05-14

HighPeak Energy: Significant Improvements In Operating Costs

HighPeak's oil sales volumes increased by 10% quarter-over-quarter, while its lease operating and workover expenses per BOE dropped 22%. Free cash flow should improve later in 2026 due to reduced capex and higher oil prices (despite significant hedges). HighPeak's oil cut may decline from 67.6% in Q1 2026 due to fewer new wells being turned in-line, though.

247wallst.com2026-05-13

One Yields 8.8%. One Is Up 83% in a Year.

Crude oil is back in the headlines for the same reason it usually is: geopolitics.

seekingalpha.com2026-05-08

HighPeak Energy, Inc. (HPK) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

HighPeak Energy, Inc. (HPK) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

zacks.com2026-05-06

HighPeak Energy, Inc. (HPK) Reports Q1 Loss, Misses Revenue Estimates

HighPeak Energy, Inc. (HPK) came out with a quarterly loss of $0.02 per share in line with the Zacks Consensus Estimate. This compares to earnings of $0.31 per share a year ago.

globenewswire.com2026-05-06

HighPeak Energy, Inc. Announces First Quarter 2026 Financial and Operating Results

FORT WORTH, Texas, May 06, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- HighPeak Energy, Inc. (“HighPeak” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: HPK) today announced financial and operating results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026.

zacks.com2026-04-29

Analysts Estimate HighPeak Energy, Inc. (HPK) to Report a Decline in Earnings: What to Look Out for

HighPeak Energy (HPK) doesn't possess the right combination of the two key ingredients for a likely earnings beat in its upcoming report. Get prepared with the key expectations.

defenseworld.net2026-04-25

Critical Analysis: Rancher Energy (OTCMKTS:TRXO) & HighPeak Energy (NASDAQ:HPK)

Rancher Energy (OTCMKTS:TRXO - Get Free Report) and HighPeak Energy (NASDAQ: HPK - Get Free Report) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, risk and profitability. Institutional and Insider Ownership 24.1% of HighPeak Energy

defenseworld.net2026-04-24

Reviewing VOC Energy Trust (NYSE:VOC) & HighPeak Energy (NASDAQ:HPK)

VOC Energy Trust (NYSE: VOC - Get Free Report) and HighPeak Energy (NASDAQ: HPK - Get Free Report) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations. Valuation and Earnings This table compares

globenewswire.com2026-04-23

HighPeak Energy, Inc. Announces 2026 First Quarter Earnings Release and Conference Call Dates

FORT WORTH, Texas, April 23, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- HighPeak Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: HPK) (“HighPeak Energy”), today announced that it plans to release its 2026 first quarter financial and operating results after the close of trading on Wednesday, May 6, 2026.

defenseworld.net2026-04-04

HighPeak Energy (NASDAQ:HPK) Shares Gap Up – Still a Buy?

Shares of HighPeak Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: HPK - Get Free Report) gapped up before the market opened on Thursday. The stock had previously closed at $6.30, but opened at $7.00. HighPeak Energy shares last traded at $7.1250, with a volume of 226,048 shares. Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades A number of brokerages have recently weighed in

seekingalpha.com2026-03-12

HighPeak Energy: Reducing Its Net Debt With A Conservative 2026 Development Plan

HighPeak Energy is projected to generate $155 million in 2026 free cash flow at the current $81 to $82 strip and its guidance midpoint. It is significantly hedged on oil in 2026 and is projected to have $109 million in 2026 hedging losses. HighPeak's oil cut went from 72% in Q1 2025 to 64% in Q4 2025.

seekingalpha.com2026-03-12

HighPeak Energy, Inc. (HPK) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

HighPeak Energy, Inc. (HPK) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

seekingalpha.com2026-03-12

HighPeak Energy: Brand New Profitability Focus

HighPeak Energy (HPK) installed a new CEO from Diamondback Energy to address operational inefficiencies and restore market confidence. HPK's legacy strategy prioritized rapid production growth over cost control. The new capital budget emphasizes margin expansion through operational optimization.

zacks.com2026-03-11

HighPeak Energy, Inc. (HPK) Reports Q4 Loss, Misses Revenue Estimates

HighPeak Energy, Inc. (HPK) came out with a quarterly loss of $0.21 per share versus the Zacks Consensus Estimate of a loss of $0.04. This compares to earnings of $0.06 per share a year ago.

globenewswire.com2026-03-11

HighPeak Energy, Inc. Announces Fourth Quarter and Year-End 2025 Financial and Operating Results and Provides 2026 Guidance

FORT WORTH, Texas, March 11, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- HighPeak Energy, Inc. (“HighPeak” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: HPK) today announced financial and operating results for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2025. In addition, HighPeak provided its 2026 guidance and capital budget, as approved by its Board of Directors.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"HPK reported Q1 2026 revenue of $215.9M and an EPS of -$1.02, with net income of -$127.4M (net margin -59.0%). QoQ, revenue increased from $165.8M (Q4 2025) to $215.9M (+30.2%), but profitability deteriorated sharply: net income fell from -$25.2M to -$127.4M (worsened by -405%). YoY, revenue declined from $257.4M (Q1 2025) to $215.9M (-16.1%), and net income swung from +$36.3M to -$127.4M (down -450.1M). Over the last four quarters, gross profit margin compressed from ~37.8% (Q1 2025) to 19.8% (Q1 2026), while operating income swung from +$90.4M (Q1 2025) to +$36.0M (Q1 2026) but was overwhelmed by significantly worse pre-tax/other income items, driving large losses. Operating cash flow was positive at $48.1M, but capex was heavy ($114.4M), resulting in free cash flow of -$66.2M. The balance sheet remains highly levered: total assets were ~$3.28B and equity decreased to $1.47B, with net debt still elevated (~$1.09B). Shareholder returns look weak: the stock is down -40.5% over 1 year, and the dividend yield is effectively 0%. Analyst consensus price target is $12 vs. $5.34 current (implying material upside on paper), though recent fundamentals show significant earnings instability."

Revenue Growth

Caution

QoQ revenue rose +30.2% (from $165.8M to $215.9M), but YoY declined -16.1% (from $257.4M). The 4-quarter trajectory shows weakening revenue and volatility.

Profitability

Neutral

Net income deteriorated: YoY swing from +$36.3M (Q1 2025) to -$127.4M (Q1 2026). Net margin contracted from +14.1% to -59.0%. Gross margin also compressed (37.8% to 19.8%).

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Operating cash flow remained positive at $48.1M, but capex of -$114.4M drove free cash flow to -$66.2M. No dividend support (dividends paid $0; dividend yield ~0%). Buybacks were 0 in the quarter.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Caution

Total assets increased to ~$3.28B, but leverage remains high (net debt ~$1.09B; debt/equity ~0.81). Equity decreased vs prior quarter (from $1.59B to $1.47B), suggesting reduced cushion.

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

1-year price performance is -40.5% with effectively no dividend (yield ~0%). Total return is negative, and momentum does not support valuation.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Fair

Consensus target ~$12 implies ~125% upside vs $5.34 current price, but given the large recent losses and margin compression, valuation confidence is tempered.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

High Peak’s Q1 2026 results show strong execution under a reduced-capex “maintenance mode” plan. Production averaged ~46,000 BOE/d (+~7.5% vs guidance midpoint) with oil up ~10% QoQ, driven by both new wells and base optimization. The company’s standout was operating efficiency: LOE per BOE came in >17% below guided range (~22% below Q4) and absolute operating cost fell ~$7.4 million QoQ while generating higher output. Workovers are producing measurable step-ups—16 projects lifted oil from ~1,600 to ~2,600 bpd (+~1,000 bpd) and improved ~63% per well on average. Financially, free cash flow improved versus Q4, excluding working capital: over $21 million vs -$42 million, though Q1 had a ~$35 million negative working-capital swing tied to rigs and final frac jobs. Management expects steadier working-capital going forward and reiterated flat production with similar first-half weighting for 2027, exiting 2026 with ~9–10 DUCs.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • New well performance: oil production up ~10% QoQ; balanced contribution from new wells and base production optimization
  • Targeted workovers: 16 targeted workover projects increased oil production from ~1,600 bpd to ~2,600 bpd (+~1,000 bpd; +63% per well on average)
  • Chemical program optimization and electrification: improved lease operating efficiency via right-treatment chemical program, better fuel-gas use, and increased field electrification reliability

Business Development

    AI IconFinancial Highlights

    • Production averaged ~46,000 BOE/d, ~7.5% above midpoint of guidance range (inclusive of winter storm impact); oil up ~10% QoQ
    • Lease operating expense (LOE) per BOE: >17% below guided range and ~22% below Q4 levels
    • Absolute LOE dollars: operating cost down ~7.4 million QoQ while producing more barrels
    • Net oil produced per $ of capital: improved >60% QoQ from ~21,500 bpd per $MM capital to ~35,400 barrels per $MM
    • Capital spending: ~29% of full-year budget in Q1; ~33% of yearly activity; exited Q1 with 18 wells in progress
    • Free cash flow: excluding working capital changes, generated over $21 million in Q1 vs negative $42 million in Q4 (supported by <1 month of elevated oil prices)
    • Working capital swing: negative working capital swing of ~$35 million in Q1 tied to additional rig(s) and final frac jobs; management expects no similarly large swings for the remainder of 2026
    • Derivatives/hedges: total derivatives loss on paper ~$15.055 billion; only ~$17.4 million was cash loss; ~$140 million was mark-to-market loss as of March 31; if oil prices stay lower, mark-to-market and cash impacts are expected to shrink

    AI IconCapital Funding

    • At-the-market (ATM) program established allowing issuance up to $150 million of common stock; no requirement to issue shares
    • Stated intended use if accessed: reducing debt, increasing liquidity, strengthening balance sheet
    • No explicit buyback authorization or debt level provided in transcript

    AI IconStrategy & Ops

    • Shift to maintenance mode development strategy: reduced capital program by ~50% vs last year; goal to hold production roughly flat while maximizing free cash flow
    • Capital allocation pacing: guided to ~60% of 2026 capital in the first half; management indicates Q2 activity expected similar to Q1 and production expected to trend toward a flatter profile
    • Base optimization: 16 workover projects using existing infrastructure; mini stimulation/interventions including surfactants and acid to reduce damage and improve productivity
    • Operational economics: due to Waha vs Henry Hub dislocation, management is prioritizing fuel gas usage in-house rather than selling (where not profitable) and continuing electrification across field operations

    AI IconMarket Outlook

    • Production: management expects more of a flat 2026 production profile, upper portion of the originally guided production range driven by base optimization and new wells coming online
    • CapEx: guided range remains applicable; Q1 spending consistency supports the plan
    • 2027 activity cadence assumption: management expects 2027 to be very similar to 2026 from an activity standpoint
    • DUC inventory: expects to exit 2026 with roughly 9–10 DUCs going into 2027; modeling midpoint for 2027 CapEx referenced as ~$270 million

    AI IconRisks & Headwinds

    • Oil price volatility/geopolitical risk: management notes potential for increasing pressure on the back end of the curve if geopolitical situation persists
    • Waha/ Henry Hub gas dislocation: management acknowledges gas is not profitable in current conditions and is managing fuel-gas economics internally
    • Hedge mark-to-market sensitivity: reported earnings impacted by derivatives; cash losses vs mark-to-market can vary with oil price trajectory
    • Water encroachment in an eastern red-box inventory area: only Wolfcamp A inventory retained; management will not drill another well there and expects ongoing effects on production/LOE efficiency through the year

    Q&A: Analyst Interest

    • Topic: 2026 back-half production progression and potential 2027 cadence with DUC visibility: Management said Q2 activity should mirror Q1, with production staying hot vs guide through quarter-to-date and likely settling to a flatter profile. For DUCs, they expect ~9–10 DUCs exiting 2026 into 2027, supporting a similar program cadence.
    • Topic: Working-capital swing drivers and how to model it through 2026: Management tied the large Q1 working-capital impact (~$35 million negative) to the prior-quarter setup—two rigs running during most of Q4 and a couple of large final frac jobs—then said it is behind them. They do not expect similarly large working-capital swings in the remainder of 2026.
    • Topic: Hedge accounting and earnings sensitivity under lower oil prices: Management clarified reported derivatives impacts were largely mark-to-market. Total derivatives loss on paper was ~$15.055 billion, but cash loss was ~$17.4 million; the remainder (~$140 million) was mark-to-market at March 31. If oil prices pull back, that mark-to-market loss and any cash hedge loss should shrink as the year progresses.

    Sentiment: POSITIVE

    Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the HPK Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

    📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

    Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for HPK.

    SEC EDGAR Live Feed
    Loading financial data and tables...
    📁

    SEC Filings (HPK)

    © 2026 Stock Market Info — HighPeak Energy, Inc. (HPK) Financial Profile