Lululemon Athletica Inc.

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) Market Cap

Lululemon Athletica Inc. has a market capitalization of $12.97B.

Price: $114.23

-10.69 (-8.56%)

Market Cap: 12.97B

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: Meghan C. Frank

Sector: Consumer Cyclical

Industry: Apparel - Retail

IPO Date: 2007-07-27

Website: https://shop.lululemon.com

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) - Company Information

Market Cap: 12.97B|Sector: Consumer Cyclical

Company Profile

lululemon athletica inc., together with its subsidiaries, designs, distributes, and retails athletic apparel and accessories for women and men. It operates in two segments, Company-Operated Stores and Direct to Consumer. The company offers pants, shorts, tops, and jackets for healthy lifestyle and athletic activities, such as yoga, running, and training, as well as other sweaty pursuits. It also provides fitness-related accessories and footwear. The company sells its products through a chain of company-operated stores; outlets and warehouse sales; interactive workout platform; a network of wholesale accounts, such as yoga studios, health clubs, and fitness centers; temporary locations; and license and supply arrangements, as well as directly to consumer through mobile apps and lululemon.com e-commerce website. As of January 30, 2022, it operated 574 company-operated stores under the lululemon brand in the United States, Canada, the People's Republic of China, Australia, the United Kingdom, Japan, New Zealand, Germany, South Korea, Singapore, France, Malaysia, Sweden, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, and Switzerland. lululemon athletica inc. was founded in 1998 and is based in Vancouver, Canada.

Analyst Sentiment

60%
Buy

From 34 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $155.55

▲ +36.2% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$88

Median

$134

High Bound

$250

Average

$156

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$155.55
▲ +36.17% Upside
Low Target
$88.00
-23% Risk
Median Target
$134.00
17% Mid
High Target
$250.00
119% Max
Consensus
Hold
29 / 71 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ2 2026Q1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMay 3, 2026Feb 1, 2026Nov 2, 2025Aug 3, 2025May 4, 2025Feb 2, 2025Oct 27, 2024Jul 28, 2024
Market Cap ($M)12,97114,88621,30719,61423,49533,60249,92537,73432,306
Enterprise Value ($M)13,59315,50721,29820,34124,10233,98449,51738,06032,155
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)9.0319.089.0815.9815.8426.7016.6826.8120.56
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)0.229.922.430.3324.852.80
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)1.166.025.857.649.3014.1713.8215.7413.63
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)2.733.084.294.365.367.8311.559.478.01
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)10.13170.9922.20237.91155.83-123.8942.80308.85108.39
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)6.275.857.939.5414.3413.7115.8813.56
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)5.5454.2122.2036.1137.4561.4442.1162.9949.95
Debt to Equity Ratio0.250.440.360.390.400.400.360.380.36

LULU Growth Runway Model

Standard long term linear growth fade

Multi-Stage Discounted Cash Flow Sandbox

Market Price$114.23
Intrinsic Value$193.02
Market Alignment
Undervalued by 69.0%relative to calculated intrinsic value
9.00%
Exp: 1%1%
i

Growth runway slowdown

This value provides a time window for the growth rate to decline beyond Stage 1 toward the terminal rate. Longer windows are most useful for companies with high growth starting conditions or strong competitive advantages. This option stretches out the growth rate slowdown across 5, 10, or 15-year steps. A high-growth starting condition (exceeding a 25% initial growth rate) automatically applies a curve decay to simulate realistic, rapid market saturation.
i

Terminal growth rate

With long-term inflation between 3-5%, revenue must grow by that baseline to maintain flat real-world market share. This value sets the permanent terminal growth rate to factor into the valuation beyond the growth slowdown runway toward maturity.

3-Stage Financial Runway Horizon

🧠 Perpetuity Horizon Engine (Stage 3: Post-2035)

Terminal FCF Base$1.78B
Perpetuity TV Value$33.54B
Discounted TV (PV)$14.17B
TV Weighting %57.9%
⚠️
Financial Model Disclaimer & Risk Disclosure: This interactive scenario simulator is an educational sandbox provided strictly for informational and analytical research purposes. Core historical financial statements and consensus estimates are sourced directly via Financial Modeling Prep (FMP). All downstream outputs are entirely deterministic, hypothetical projections generated by combining automated mathematical formulas (including linear interpolation and Gaussian bell-curve decay models) with user-selected variables and third-party financial data inputs. Users assume all liability for trading decisions executed based on these sandbox calculations.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 LULULEMON ATHLETICA INC (LULU) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Lululemon operates a premium athletic apparel business built around a vertically coordinated design-to-distribution model. The company designs product, sources and manufactures through a global supply network, and sells through a mix of direct-to-consumer (owned stores and e-commerce) and wholesale partners. The core economic dynamic is the company’s ability to translate product-market fit into higher-margin DTC sales while maintaining wholesale as a discoverability and throughput channel. This structure also supports faster feedback loops on fit, fabric performance, and merchandising, which can improve inventory quality and reduce markdown reliance relative to peers that depend more heavily on off-price retailing or larger bulk wholesale commitments.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is primarily generated from apparel and accessories, sold through: - Direct-to-consumer (DTC): owned retail stores and e-commerce. DTC generally carries higher gross margin due to reduced intermediary costs and greater control over pricing and assortment. - Wholesale: partner channels that provide incremental volume, though with lower margins than DTC. Primary monetisation/margin drivers: - DTC mix and price integrity: maintaining a premium price band supports gross margin and reduces the need for frequent promotional intensity. - Merchandising effectiveness: product category leadership (e.g., core bottoms and performance tops) supports repeat purchase behavior and more efficient inventory planning. - Operating leverage: as fixed costs (store footprint management, corporate overhead, digital infrastructure) spread over sales, operating profitability can expand when inventory discipline remains intact.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Lululemon’s moat is best described as a blend of intangible assets (product/community positioning), scale/distribution leverage (DTC and omnichannel execution), and private-label resistance (premium performance and fit expectations that are difficult to replicate at mass retailers). - Intangible asset durability: Lululemon competes on sustained product development (fabric feel, fit, and durability) and on a distinctive lifestyle association that supports pricing discipline. - Scale and distribution leverage: a large owned retail and e-commerce base improves demand capture, customer data visibility, and control over assortment and promotions. - Private-label resistance: mass-market and retailer private labels can offer price points, but matching the premium performance/fit profile and consistently delivering at the same quality level is operationally and brand-reputation difficult. Competitive benchmarking (primary rivals): - Nike and Adidas: broad sportswear platforms with strong distribution reach and category breadth; these brands often compete through global marketing scale and franchise-style product lines rather than a tightly curated premium specialty assortment. - Under Armour: performance-focused positioning with strong product R&D; competition centers on technical apparel claims and athlete/end-user segments. - Alo Yoga (specialty premium comp): more direct comparability in premium yoga/athleisure styling, competing for similar wardrobe occasions and customer preferences. Industry focus contrast: While large incumbents (Nike/Adidas/Under Armour) prioritize broad category coverage and scale distribution, Lululemon’s emphasis on premium, specialty-led assortment and high-execution DTC distribution is designed to protect pricing and merchandise quality. Compared with specialty rivals like Alo Yoga, Lululemon’s scale in supply chain coordination and retail/e-commerce reach strengthens distribution leverage and the ability to fund sustained product development.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Key secular growth drivers over a 5–10 year horizon include: - Athleisure and performance-to-lifestyle blend: continued expansion of “athletic comfort” apparel into everyday use supports long runway for performance materials and silhouettes. - Assortment expansion within a premium anchor: leveraging existing customer preferences to grow adjacent categories (tops, men’s, accessories) without losing brand coherence. - Geographic penetration and store productivity: gradual densification and localization of retail presence, combined with e-commerce logistics maturity, can improve total customer access. - Omnichannel growth: e-commerce and store networks can reinforce one another through omnichannel inventory strategies, improved customer journeys, and targeted merchandising. - Loyalty and customer relationship mechanics: structured repeat-purchase programs and enhanced engagement can reduce acquisition reliance and support recurring buying behavior in staple categories.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

Structural and operational risks include: - Demand cyclicality and promotional leakage: premium apparel remains exposed to macro sensitivity; weaker demand can force markdowns and erode gross margin. - Fashion and product-cycle risk: apparel is inherently trend-driven; misjudging fit, fabric performance expectations, or style timing can lead to inventory build and discounting. - Inventory management and supply chain volatility: global sourcing introduces lead-time and cost risks; execution issues can pressure inventory turns and margins. - Competitive intensity in premium athleisure: specialty competitors and large-scale brands can raise promotional activity or broaden their premium offerings. - Regulatory and ESG-related costs: labor, sourcing, and environmental reporting requirements can increase compliance costs and constrain sourcing decisions. - Foreign exchange and tariff exposure: international sourcing and sales create exposure to currency movements and trade policy changes.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Markets typically value premium apparel and DTC retailers using a combination of: - Price-to-sales (P/S) and EV/EBITDA: driven by growth durability and margin structure. - Multiple discipline around operating margin and inventory health: valuation tends to improve when gross margin stability and operating leverage coincide with strong inventory turns (signaling less reliance on discounting). Key valuation “needle movers”: - Sustained DTC mix and gross margin resilience - Evidence of repeat purchase strength and stable full-price selling behavior - Operating leverage from store productivity and e-commerce scale without excessive promotional spend - Inventory discipline that limits markdown intensity

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Lululemon’s long-term thesis rests on a premium, specialty-led business model with meaningful intangible asset strength, DTC distribution leverage, and private-label resistance. The company’s ability to protect pricing, manage inventory through high merchandise quality, and scale omnichannel distribution supports durability in profitability even as category competition intensifies. The primary investment challenge is maintaining product-market fit and inventory discipline across cycles while sustaining DTC-led margin structure.

⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for LULU.

fool.com2026-06-07

Can Lululemon Stocks Stage a Turnaround, or Is It Time to Throw in the Towel?

Lululemon turned in solid results but lowered its guidance as trends weakened during the quarter. The company's new CEO won't take over until September.

gurufocus.com2026-06-05

Did lululemon athletica inc. Insiders Breach their Fiduciary Duties to Shareholders?

Did lululemon athletica inc. Insiders Breach their Fiduciary Duties to Shareholders? PR Newswire NEW YORK, June

prnewswire.com2026-06-05

Did lululemon athletica inc. Insiders Breach their Fiduciary Duties to Shareholders?

Shareholders are urged to contact the firm immediately at no cost or obligation, as there may be limited time to enforce your rights. We would handle the matter on a contingent fee basis, whereby you would not be responsible for out-of-pocket payment of our legal fees or expenses.

nypost.com2026-06-05

Lululemon shares tank 8% as investors rattled by profit warning: ‘Brand momentum is fading'

In the quarter, Lululemon attributed the sales weakness in part to a spike in “negative commentary” across media and social platforms.

marketbeat.com2026-06-05

A Lulu of a Miss Sends Lululemon to New Lows—Look Out Below

Lululemon's NASDAQ: LULU Q1 results reveal a fundamental truth that will impact its share price long into the future. While still a growing company, offering value to investors, the brand just isn't as cool as it used to be, and that's a hard-to-overcome headwind.

investopedia.com2026-06-05

Lululemon Slashed Its Outlook. The Stock Is Plunging to Its Lowest Point Since 2018

A weaker outlook has Lululemon's stock plunging to its lowest level in years.

invezz.com2026-06-05

Lululemon tumbles after forecast cut; analysts see prolonged turnaround ahead

Lululemon Athletica LULU shares fell sharply on Friday after the athletic apparel retailer lowered its annual profit outlook and issued weaker-than-expected sales guidance, deepening investor concerns about the pace of its turnaround efforts. The stock dropped nearly 9% in early trading after the company projected flat to slightly lower revenue for the full year.

zacks.com2026-06-05

lululemon Q1 Earnings & Revenues Beat Estimates, FY26 Guidance Soft

LULU beats on Q1 EPS and revenues. But shares fall after hours as tariffs and markdowns squeeze margins and the company cuts FY26 view, as Americas comps slide.

investopedia.com2026-06-05

5 Things to Know Before the Stock Market Opens

Stocks are under pressure in premarket trading Friday, putting the S&P 500 in danger of snapping a nine-week winning streak; chip stocks are extending yesterday's losses as the AI trade stumbles after a recent rally; the May jobs report is expected to show that U.S. employers added roles for the third straight month; S&P Global said it is not making changes to its rules for new additions to stock indexes, which would keep SpaceX, Anthropic and OpenAI from being quickly added after their mega-IPOs; and Lululemon shares are tumbling after the apparel maker cut its full-year outlook. Here's what you need to know today.

schaeffersresearch.com2026-06-05

Stock Futures Stalled by Hotter-Than-Expected Jobs Report

Stock futures are mixed amid semiconductor, with the Nasdaq heading for a sharp open as tech unwinds

fool.com2026-06-05

Breakfast News: ServiceTitan's AI Tailwind Extends

TTAN posts strong results, Lululemon lowers full-year guidance, Bitcoin hits four-month low, and more

proactiveinvestors.com2026-06-05

NewPeak advances Las Opeñas drilling as first assays fast-tracked

NewPeak Metals Ltd (ASX:NPM, OTC:NPMFF, FRA:NPM) has completed more than 1,800 metres of diamond drilling at its Las Opeñas Gold Project in Argentina, with...

proactiveinvestors.com2026-06-05

Imugene showcases Azer-Cel progress at ASCO - ICYMI

Imugene Ltd (ASX:IMU, OTC:IUGNF, FRA:ILA) earlier this week highlighted encouraging clinical progress for its Azer-Cel program after presenting new data at...

seekingalpha.com2026-06-05

Wall Street Breakfast Podcast: LULU's Discount Dilemma

Lululemon Athletica (LULU) lowered FY26 guidance, citing ongoing profit and margin pressures despite a Q1 top- and bottom-line beat. LULU's Q2 revenue and EPS guidance both fell short of consensus, with management adopting a more conservative outlook amid lower-quality online traffic.

proactiveinvestors.com2026-06-05

Small Cap Watch: Small-cap explorers advance gold, rare earths and antimony projects

The S&P/ASX Small Ordinaries Index (ASX: XSO) slipped 43.7 points, or 1.25%, to close at 3,461.5 yesterday and has eased a further 5.1 points, or 0.15%,...

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-05-03

"Lululemon (LULU) reported Q1’26 revenue of $2.47B and net income of $195.0M, with EPS of $1.69. Versus the same quarter last year (Q1’25), revenue grew +4.2% YoY (from $2.37B) and net income increased +37.3% YoY (from $314.6M). Versus the prior quarter (Q4’25), revenue declined -32.1% QoQ (from $3.64B) and net income fell -66.8% QoQ (from $586.9M), reflecting typical seasonality and/or mix volatility. Profitability was mixed across the quarter: gross margin was slightly down QoQ (54.2% vs 54.9%) and down vs Q1’25 (54.2% vs 58.3%). However, operating income and EPS were still positive, with net margin at 7.9% in Q1’26, down from Q4’25 (16.1%) and down from Q1’25 (13.3%). Cash flow quality weakened materially QoQ: operating cash flow dropped to $214M from $1.14B in Q4’25, while free cash flow slipped to $87.1M from $959.7M. Balance sheet resilience remains solid with total assets of $7.58B and equity of $5.02B; net debt improved to ~$0.62B from near net cash in Q4’25. Total shareholder returns appear muted: the stock is down -32.9% over 1 year, providing negative capital appreciation momentum (no buyback/dividend cash details this quarter beyond repurchases)."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

Revenue +4.2% YoY in Q1’26, but -32.1% QoQ from Q4’25, indicating volatility/seasonality rather than a steady sequential uptrend.

Profitability

Caution

Net margin fell to 7.9% in Q1’26 from 16.1% QoQ and 13.3% YoY; gross margin also contracted vs both Q4’25 and Q1’25.

Cash Flow Quality

Fair

Operating cash flow declined sharply QoQ ($214M vs $1.14B). Free cash flow was positive but much lower ($87M vs $960M), suggesting weaker near-term cash conversion.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Positive

Equity is strong at ~$5.02B and total assets are stable-to-up. Leverage is moderate with net debt ~$0.62B (worsened from near net cash in Q4’25), but balance sheet remains resilient.

Shareholder Returns

Caution

1-year price performance is -32.9%, which is a headwind for total return. Dividend yield is 0% per data; buyback activity is indicated by financing cash flows but the net impact on total return is not sufficient to offset price decline.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Positive

Consensus target ($200.57) is above the current price ($167.28), implying potential upside; downside protection is indicated by the low target ($130).

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

Lululemon’s Q1 performance shows a classic growth-quality problem: comparable sales fell (-2%) while margins compressed sharply (-410 bps gross, driven by -280 bps tariffs and +40 bps markdowns). Management attributes the near-term top-line weakness to two specific, time-bound issues: spikes of negative brand/social commentary hitting traffic and some product launches missing expectations, particularly as the company transitions into Q2. While China Mainland remains a bright spot (revenue +30% constant currency; comp +13%), North America is pressured (comp -6%) and management expects continued deterioration in the quarter. Guidance confirms the market’s concern: Q2 revenue down 2–3%, gross margin down ~410 bps, EPS $1.76–$1.81, and operating margin ~11.6% versus 20.7% last year. The plan is operationally specific—faster chase (20% more volume), reduced SKU density, and more brand activations (SeaWheeze, yoga summer series, Great Wall/Summer Sweat Games)—but the margin/clearance timeline is explicitly front-loaded in Q2, making near-term volatility the key risk.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Q2 warm weather rollouts across run, tennis, golf, and lifestyle; expanded silhouettes/new elevated colors in Daydrift and Define
  • Chasing 20% more volume vs last year to speed feedback loops and get back into strong styles faster
  • Store fleet optimization: 15% fewer SKUs in North America to highlight newness and innovation; reduced markdowns to support full-price focus
  • Brand/community activations: SeaWheeze (Aug, Vancouver) and yoga summer series (NYC kickoff plus free summer classes for tens of thousands)
  • China Mainland engagement: sixth annual Summer Sweat Games (late June–August) culminating in Hangzhou national championship; Great Wall of China yoga event with 2,000+ guests and 70 ambassadors

Business Development

  • Franchise expansion: first location opened in Greece; plans underway to open in India later in 2026
  • SEA/Community activation partner ecosystem: press and partners experience extensions mentioned, including “exclusive…experiences for press and partners” (no named external entities provided)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Q1 net revenue up 4% (2% constant currency) to $2.5B; comparable sales -2%
  • Gross margin 54.2% vs 58.3% prior year: -410 bps, driven by product margin -330 bps
  • Tariff impact: -280 bps in Q1; offset by +100 bps from enterprise efficiency initiatives; markdowns +40 bps
  • SG&A: $1.06B at 42.9% of revenue vs 39.8% prior year (+310 bps), including layered-back items (store labor hours/incentive comp, timing of brand activations) and proxy contest costs
  • Operating income $277M (11.2% margin) vs 18.5% in Q1 2025
  • Tax expense $91M; effective tax rate 31.8% vs 30.2% a year ago, driven by lower stock-based compensation deductions
  • Q2 guidance: revenue $2.45B–$2.475B (-2% to -3%); gross margin expected to decrease ~410 bps vs Q2 2025
  • Q2 gross margin drivers: tariffs -150 bps with ~+100 bps offsets; markdowns +50 bps vs last year
  • Q2 SG&A rate deleverage +500 bps vs Q2 2025; operating margin ~11.6% vs 20.7% in Q2 2025
  • Q2 EPS guidance $1.76–$1.81 vs $3.10 prior year; effective tax rate ~30%

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Share repurchases: 2.2M shares repurchased at avg price $165 (Q1)
  • Cash and cash equivalents: $1.5B; revolver capacity: nearly $600M available
  • Share repurchase program remaining: ~$1B; 2026 repurchase levels expected in line with 2025
  • Capital expenditures: $127M in Q1 2026; full-year capex outlook $700M–$720M (includes DC, store, relocations, renovations, and technology)

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Product development cycle reduced from 18–24 months to 15–16 months; working toward 12–14 months
  • Inventory units down ~4% (while dollar inventory +2%) attributed to higher tariff rates vs last year and FX
  • North America store merchandising changes: 15% fewer SKUs; performance/lifestyle merchandising focus; significant markdown reduction
  • Selective pilot in a smaller subset of doors: further SKU reductions, more curated local assortment, updated fixtures/images/mannequins
  • E-commerce: conversion uplift efforts via sharper visual merchandising and premium storytelling (initial response; expect more traction over time)
  • Enterprise enablement: supply chain network optimization review; procurement price/terms optimization and volume consolidation/rationalization; AI-powered systems and automation for efficiencies

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Q2 revenue $2.45B–$2.475B (-2% to -3%); North America decline low double digits (U.S. low double digits); China Mainland growth mid- to high teens; Rest of World high single to low double digits
  • Q2 markdowns +50 bps vs last year; Q3 sequential improvement expected vs Q2 and Q4 markdowns under last year (Q4 described as high-water year for markdowns)
  • Full-year 2026 revenue $11.0B–$11.15B (flat to -1% vs 2025); North America down high single digits; China Mainland +~20%; Rest of World mid-teens
  • Full-year gross margin decrease ~90 bps vs last year; tariffs gross impact ~30 bps with offsets expected to offset almost all
  • Incremental tariff rate assumptions: Q2 +10% (down from prior ~20%); back half assumes 20% incremental rate
  • Full-year diluted EPS $10.95–$11.15 (excludes impact of any future share repurchases); effective tax rate ~30%

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Traffic and top-line hit from spikes of negative brand commentary on media/social channels (end of Q1 into Q2), now subsided but still reflected in updated guidance
  • Product launch misses: some new items failed to generate anticipated guest response; impacts “all areas of our business” in management’s early analysis
  • Tariff headwinds: Q1 tariff gross negative impact -280 bps; Q2 expects -150 bps with partial offsets
  • Markdown/cost deleverage: Q1 markdowns +40 bps; Q2 markdowns +50 bps; operating margin pressure (Q2 operating margin ~11.6% vs 20.7% prior year)
  • China Mainland volatility: negative commentary most pronounced end of April/early May; momentum slowing toward end of Q1 (now partially improved)
  • Rest of World disruptions: Middle East franchise disruption due to conflict in Iran; softer tourism in Europe and Japan

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Topic: Assortment mix/newness vs core and margin stabilization/clearance pacing; Management's detailed response: Management attributed the traffic/conversion drop in the last 6–7 weeks to negative brand commentary and some product launches underperforming. For margins, gross margin guidance is 90 bps below last year; markdowns up 50 bps in Q2 as the high-water clearance period, then flat-to-modest improvement full year.
  • Topic: International risk of new product misses and markdown recovery assumptions; Management's detailed response: Management said international portfolios are more diversified than North America, with global core franchises strengthened via different colors/iterations, plus diversified newness. For markdowns, Management guided sequential improvement: Q3 improves vs Q2, and Q4 markdowns are expected under last year given it was the peak clearance quarter.
  • Topic: China trend drivers and confidence for improvement through the year; Management's detailed response: Management linked China’s recent deceleration to negative commentary in late April/early May, noting it was most pronounced in that window, then partially improving as brand noise dissipated. Confidence remained tied to underlying momentum and annual guidance of ~20% growth for the year, consistent with second-half expectations.

Sentiment: CAUTIOUS

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the LULU Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for LULU.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (LULU)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) Financial Profile