Old Second Bancorp, Inc.

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC) Market Cap

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. has a market capitalization of $1.11B.

Price: $21.56

ā–² 0.14 (0.65%)

Market Cap: 1.11B

NASDAQ Ā· time unavailable

CEO: James L. Eccher

Sector: Financial Services

Industry: Banks - Regional

IPO Date: 1993-11-16

Website: https://www.oldsecond.com

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC) - Company Information

Market Cap: 1.11B|Sector: Financial Services

Company Profile

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. operates as the bank holding company for Old Second National Bank that provides community banking services. It provides demand, NOW, money market, savings, time deposit, individual retirement, and checking accounts, as well as certificate of deposit accounts. The company also offers commercial loans; lease financing receivables; commercial real estate loans; construction loans; residential real estate loans, such as residential first mortgage and second mortgage loans; home equity line of credit; consumer loans, including motor vehicle, home improvement, and signature loans; installment and agricultural loans; residential mortgages; and overdraft checking. Further, it provides safe deposit services; trust and wealth management services; and money orders, cashier's checks, foreign currency, direct deposits, discount brokerage, debit and credit cards, and other services, as well as acquires the U.S. treasury notes and bonds. In addition, the company offers online and mobile banking; corporate cash management products, including remote and mobile deposits capture, investment sweep accounts, zero balance accounts, automated tax payments, automatic teller machines access, telephone banking, lockbox accounts, automated clearing house transactions, account reconciliation, controlled disbursement, detail and general information reporting, foreign and domestic wire transfers, and vault services for currency and coin; and investment, agency, and custodial services for individual, corporate, and not-for-profit clients. It operates through 63 banking centers in Cook, DeKalb, DuPage, Kane, Kendall, LaSalle, and Will counties in Illinois. Old Second Bancorp, Inc. was incorporated in 1981 and is headquartered in Aurora, Illinois.

Analyst Sentiment

83%
Strong Buy

From 5 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $23.67

ā–² +9.8% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$23

Median

$23

High Bound

$25

Average

$24

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

šŸŽÆ Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$23.67
ā–² +9.79% Upside
Low Target
$23.00
7% Risk
Median Target
$23.00
7% Mid
High Target
$25.00
16% Max
Consensus
Buy
5 / 6 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

šŸ“Š Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)1,1091,0621,027911798748797699668
Enterprise Value ($M)1,3841,3371,2421,0847896168401,0571,009
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)13.1910.388.9223.079.149.4310.437.627.63
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)———0.633.33—45.112.9213.31
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)2.609.558.977.899.429.089.348.218.04
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)1.271.191.151.051.111.081.191.061.08
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)7.9629.3624.0926.2430.8646.1136.5015.1576.88
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)—12.0310.859.399.327.489.8412.4112.15
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)10.9939.2528.5565.7324.6921.3129.3333.9032.10
Debt to Equity Ratio2.180.360.380.330.180.180.210.720.75

⚔ OSBC Growth Runway Model

Standard long term linear growth fade

Multi-Stage Discounted Cash Flow Sandbox

Market Price$21.56
Intrinsic Value$5.21
Market Alignment
Overvalued by 75.8%relative to calculated intrinsic value
9.00%
Exp: 3%3%
i

Growth runway slowdown

This value provides a time window for the growth rate to decline beyond Stage 1 toward the terminal rate. Longer windows are most useful for companies with high growth starting conditions or strong competitive advantages. This option stretches out the growth rate slowdown across 5, 10, or 15-year steps. A high-growth starting condition (exceeding a 25% initial growth rate) automatically applies a curve decay to simulate realistic, rapid market saturation.
i

Terminal growth rate

With long-term inflation between 3-5%, revenue must grow by that baseline to maintain flat real-world market share. This value sets the permanent terminal growth rate to factor into the valuation beyond the growth slowdown runway toward maturity.

3-Stage Financial Runway Horizon

🧠 Perpetuity Horizon Engine (Stage 3: Post-2035)

Terminal FCF Base$0.04B
Perpetuity TV Value$0.77B
Discounted TV (PV)$0.32B
TV Weighting %65.2%
āš ļø
Financial Model Disclaimer & Risk Disclosure: This interactive scenario simulator is an educational sandbox provided strictly for informational and analytical research purposes. Core historical financial statements and consensus estimates are sourced directly via Financial Modeling Prep (FMP). All downstream outputs are entirely deterministic, hypothetical projections generated by combining automated mathematical formulas (including linear interpolation and Gaussian bell-curve decay models) with user-selected variables and third-party financial data inputs. Users assume all liability for trading decisions executed based on these sandbox calculations.

šŸ“˜ Full Research Report

ā„¹ļø

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

šŸ“˜ OLD SECOND BANCORP INC (OSBC) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

OLD SECOND BANCORP INC operates as a regional/community bank focused on originating and servicing loans for retail and small-to-mid-sized business customers, funded primarily by customer deposits. The value chain is straightforward:

  • Attract deposits through branch footprint, relationship-based customer service, and competitive deposit pricing.
  • Deploy deposits into interest-earning assets—principally loans—supported by credit underwriting, ongoing monitoring, and portfolio management.
  • EARN spreads by maintaining a favorable balance between the yield on earning assets and the cost of deposits, while holding sufficient capital and liquidity.
  • Generate fee income from deposit-related and loan-related services, reinforcing the bank’s customer retention and lowering reliance on net interest income alone.

The model’s stickiness comes from relationship banking: customers often prefer continuity in credit decisions and service delivery, and switching a primary banking relationship involves friction, paperwork, and timing risk.

šŸ’° Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Bank profitability is primarily driven by net interest income (NII), supplemented by non-interest income. The monetisation mechanics are:

  • Net Interest Income (core driver): interest earned on loans and securities minus interest paid on deposits and borrowings. The margin is shaped by loan mix, deposit beta, portfolio yield, and interest rate sensitivity.
  • Non-Interest Income (stability lever): fees from services such as account fees, debit/transaction-related income, and loan servicing or origination-related fees. This diversifies earnings through activities that do not require proportional balance sheet expansion.
  • Credit costs as a profitability gate: provisions and charge-offs convert loan growth into realized earnings power only if underwriting discipline holds through the cycle.
  • Operating efficiency: personnel and overhead discipline influences efficiency ratio and supports resilient profitability even when margins compress.

For OSBC specifically, the key margin drivers typically cluster around (1) deposit cost discipline, (2) loan yield and mix, and (3) credit quality/charge-off outcomes that determine how much of gross income becomes net earnings.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

OSBC’s competitive advantage is best understood through financial-services moats: cost of deposits, relationship-driven switching costs, and credit culture reinforced by local underwriting familiarity.

  • Switching Costs (relationship banking): customers—especially small businesses—tend to consolidate banking services with institutions that provide timely underwriting and responsive servicing. This reduces churn and stabilizes core deposits.
  • Cost of Deposits / Deposit Franchise: a durable deposit base improves funding quality, helping protect net interest margins. The ability to maintain affordable deposits is often the most visible moat in regional banking.
  • Credit Culture and Local Knowledge: community/regional banks often outperform by executing conservative underwriting standards and active monitoring, particularly in markets where management has underwriting experience and granular borrower insight.

Competitive Benchmarking (industry focus vs peers)

  • Wintrust Financial (WTF) and Byline Bancorp (BY)—regional banks with similar customer sets and operating models. The differentiation for OSBC is the depth of relationship coverage in its home footprint and the emphasis on maintaining funding stability and underwriting discipline.
  • Large money-center/regional peers (e.g., major national banks that compete on scale and product breadth)—often have advantages in capital markets access and technology. OSBC’s positioning typically relies less on product variety and more on relationship execution, credit responsiveness, and operating focus.

In practice, OSBC competes most effectively where customers value speed, local decisioning, and continuity—areas where customers may perceive weaker responsiveness from more distant, centralized institutions.

šŸš€ Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, OSBC’s growth potential is less dependent on a single macro variable and more tied to structural operating capabilities:

  • Deposit and branch-based customer acquisition: expanding or sustaining a core deposit base supports asset growth without excessive increases in funding costs.
  • Commercial and consumer lending franchise: maintaining origination capacity in retail and small-to-mid-sized business lending can grow loan volumes while sustaining risk-adjusted returns, provided underwriting standards remain intact.
  • Fee income insulation: scaling treasury management, transaction-based services, and loan-related fees can reduce earnings volatility versus relying on spread income alone.
  • Credit discipline through cycles: regional banks that manage through downturns can reprice faster, protect capital, and capture market share when weaker competitors retrench.
  • Capital and efficiency leverage: consistent operating discipline enables reinvestment into the loan pipeline and technology, while protecting tangible book value and return on equity.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Credit and concentration risk: community banks can be exposed to localized economic conditions and particular borrower types. Any sustained deterioration in loan performance—especially in commercial real estate, construction, or higher-risk segments—can pressure earnings.
  • Interest rate and liquidity risk: mismatches between asset yields and deposit repricing speeds can compress margins. Deposit funding stability matters most when competition for deposits increases.
  • Regulatory capital and stress testing: bank regulations, capital requirements, and supervisory expectations affect growth capacity and balance sheet flexibility.
  • Competitive deposit pricing: maintaining a cost-efficient deposit mix can be challenging when rivals pursue funding aggressively.
  • Operational and cybersecurity risk: reliance on modern banking systems creates ongoing exposure to technology, third parties, and operational disruptions.

šŸ“Š Valuation & Market View

Market participants typically value banks using a mix of price-to-book (P/TBV), earnings multiples, and tangible return metrics rather than purely growth-oriented measures. Key valuation drivers include:

  • Return on tangible common equity and sustainability of earnings power.
  • Net interest margin resilience and the quality of the deposit base (core vs. rate-sensitive funding).
  • Credit quality trajectory (charge-offs and provision needs relative to earnings).
  • Efficiency and operating discipline (efficiency ratio and expense growth vs. revenue).
  • Capital levels that support growth while absorbing losses.

For OSBC-style regional models, the market often rewards durable deposit franchises and conservative credit outcomes, while discounting banks where earnings quality or balance sheet risk appears less predictable.

šŸ” Investment Takeaway

OSBC’s long-term investment case rests on durable relationship-based switching costs, a defensible cost-of-deposits funding franchise, and an underwriting-led credit culture that can compound earnings through cycles. The primary debate centers on balancing loan growth with credit discipline, sustaining funding stability, and meeting regulatory capital expectations—factors that ultimately determine whether earnings power converts into durable tangible book value.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

šŸ“° Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for OSBC.

seekingalpha.com•2026-04-24

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

defenseworld.net•2026-04-24

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:OSBC) Given Consensus Recommendation of ā€œModerate Buyā€ by Brokerages

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: OSBC - Get Free Report) has received an average rating of "Moderate Buy" from the five ratings firms that are currently covering the company, MarketBeat Ratings reports. One research analyst has rated the stock with a hold recommendation and four have given a buy recommendation to the company. The average 12

zacks.com•2026-04-22

Compared to Estimates, Old Second Bancorp (OSBC) Q1 Earnings: A Look at Key Metrics

Although the revenue and EPS for Old Second Bancorp (OSBC) give a sense of how its business performed in the quarter ended March 2026, it might be worth considering how some key metrics compare with Wall Street estimates and the year-ago numbers.

zacks.com•2026-04-22

Old Second Bancorp (OSBC) Q1 Earnings Miss Estimates

Old Second Bancorp (OSBC) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.49 per share, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.52 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.45 per share a year ago.

accessnewswire.com•2026-04-22

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. Reports First Quarter 2026 Net Income of $25.6 Million, or $0.48 per Diluted Share

AURORA, IL / ACCESS Newswire / April 22, 2026 / Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company," "Old Second," "we," "us," and "our") (NASDAQ:OSBC), the parent company of Old Second National Bank (the "Bank"), today announced financial results for the first quarter of 2026. Our net income was $25.6 million, or $0.48 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2026, compared to net income of $28.8 million, or $0.54 per diluted share, for the fourth quarter of 2025.

zacks.com•2026-04-08

Old Second Bancorp (OSBC) is a Great Momentum Stock: Should You Buy?

Does Old Second Bancorp (OSBC) have what it takes to be a top stock pick for momentum investors? Let's find out.

defenseworld.net•2026-04-07

Old Second Bancorp (NASDAQ:OSBC) Share Price Crosses Above Two Hundred Day Moving Average – Here’s Why

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: OSBC - Get Free Report)'s stock price crossed above its 200-day moving average during trading on Monday. The stock has a 200-day moving average of $19.32 and traded as high as $20.89. Old Second Bancorp shares last traded at $20.76, with a volume of 277,599 shares changing hands. Wall Street

defenseworld.net•2026-03-09

American Century Companies Inc. Acquires 160,429 Shares of Old Second Bancorp, Inc. $OSBC

American Century Companies Inc. raised its holdings in shares of Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: OSBC) by 13.1% in the third quarter, according to the company in its most recent Form 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The fund owned 1,387,891 shares of the financial services provider's stock after buying an

defenseworld.net•2026-03-05

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:OSBC) Given Average Rating of ā€œModerate Buyā€ by Brokerages

Shares of Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: OSBC - Get Free Report) have received an average rating of "Moderate Buy" from the five research firms that are currently covering the company, MarketBeat.com reports. One analyst has rated the stock with a hold rating and four have assigned a buy rating to the company. The average 12

defenseworld.net•2026-02-27

Comparing Enterprise Financial Services (NASDAQ:EFSC) & Old Second Bancorp (NASDAQ:OSBC)

Old Second Bancorp (NASDAQ: OSBC - Get Free Report) and Enterprise Financial Services (NASDAQ: EFSC - Get Free Report) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership. Insider and Institutional Ownership 67.8% of

defenseworld.net•2026-02-22

Insider Selling: Old Second Bancorp (NASDAQ:OSBC) Insider Sells $732,900.00 in Stock

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: OSBC - Get Free Report) insider Darin Patrick Campbell sold 35,000 shares of the company's stock in a transaction dated Wednesday, February 18th. The shares were sold at an average price of $20.94, for a total transaction of $732,900.00. Following the transaction, the insider directly owned 274,589 shares of the company's

defenseworld.net•2026-02-19

Old Second Bancorp (NASDAQ:OSBC) Shares Cross Above Two Hundred Day Moving Average – What’s Next?

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: OSBC - Get Free Report) passed above its two hundred day moving average during trading on Wednesday. The stock has a two hundred day moving average of $18.85 and traded as high as $21.14. Old Second Bancorp shares last traded at $20.54, with a volume of 343,724 shares changing hands.

defenseworld.net•2026-01-31

Old Second Bancorp (NASDAQ:OSBC) Shares Cross Above Two Hundred Day Moving Average – Here’s What Happened

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: OSBC - Get Free Report) shares crossed above its two hundred day moving average during trading on Friday. The stock has a two hundred day moving average of $18.61 and traded as high as $20.05. Old Second Bancorp shares last traded at $19.84, with a volume of 375,959 shares traded.

seekingalpha.com•2026-01-22

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

zacks.com•2026-01-21

Old Second Bancorp (OSBC) Reports Q4 Earnings: What Key Metrics Have to Say

While the top- and bottom-line numbers for Old Second Bancorp (OSBC) give a sense of how the business performed in the quarter ended December 2025, it could be worth looking at how some of its key metrics compare to Wall Street estimates and year-ago values.

šŸ“Š AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"OSBC reported revenue of $98.3M and net income of $25.6M in the latest quarter (EPS $0.49). YoY, revenue declined from $82.4M (2025-03-31) to $98.3M in 2026-03-31, a +19.3% YoY increase, while net income rose from $19.8M to $25.6M (+29.2% YoY). QoQ, revenue fell from $114.5M (2025-12-31) to $98.3M (āˆ’14.2%), and net income declined from $28.8M to $25.6M (āˆ’11.1%). Profitability appears volatile quarter-to-quarter: net margin improved vs the prior year’s comparable quarter (25.9% vs 24.1%), but contracted vs last quarter (26.1% vs 25.1%). Over the full 4-quarter window, margins were inconsistent—most notably, net income spiked in 2025-06-30 and then weakened in 2025-09-30 before rebounding in 2026-03-31. As a bank, balance sheet strength matters: total assets were $6.86B in the latest quarter, broadly stable vs 2025-12-31 ($6.90B) and higher than mid-2025 ($5.70B). Equity increased to $0.91B from $0.90B QoQ, indicating resilience. Net debt (proxy for leverage/interest-bearing obligations net of cash) narrowed vs 2025-12-31 ($214.9M to $155.6M; improving). Shareholder returns are strong: the stock is up 48.6% over 1 year, with a small dividend yield (~0.36–0.40% recent run-rate) contributing modestly; buybacks are not provided."

Revenue Growth

Good

Latest quarter revenue $98.3M vs $82.4M YoY: +19.3%. However QoQ revenue fell from $114.5M to $98.3M (āˆ’14.2%), indicating short-term volatility rather than steady acceleration.

Profitability

Positive

Net income $25.6M vs $19.8M YoY: +29.2%. QoQ net income decreased (āˆ’11.1%). Net margin was relatively strong YoY (~25.9% vs ~24.1%) but contracted slightly vs last quarter, with quarter-to-quarter variability across the 4-quarter period.

Cash Flow Quality

Positive

No explicit cash flow metrics were provided, but net income is positive and EPS increased YoY ($0.49 vs $0.44). Dividend yield is low (~0.36–0.39%) with payout ratio near ~12–13% in several quarters, suggesting manageable distribution, though not a high-return cash profile.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Good

Total assets were $6.86B, down slightly QoQ but well above 2025-06-30 ($5.70B). Equity improved to $0.91B from $0.90B QoQ, and net debt improved vs 2025-12-31 ($155.6M vs $214.9M), indicating improving funding posture.

Shareholder Returns

Strong

Total shareholder return profile is strong due to price momentum: 1Y change +48.6% and 6M +31.2%. Dividend yield is modest (~0.36–0.40% recent quarter run-rate) and buybacks are not shown, but the capital appreciation dominates.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Positive

Consensus target is $23 vs current price $21.93 (~+4.8% upside), implying valuation is not deeply discounted. Price momentum is strong, but implied forward upside is limited versus the near-term run rate.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

Q1 2026 was mixed for OSBC: earnings power stayed top-tier due to exceptional net interest margin (tax-equivalent NIM 5.14%, +5 bps sequentially, +26 bps y/y), disciplined expenses, and strong capital metrics (tangible equity ratio +5 bps). The offset was credit noise concentrated in two areas. Net charge-offs hit $9.8M, led by powersports ($3.9M) and a commercial office relationship in Downtown Chicago ($3.9M) where valuation was ~50% lower following vacancy and an updated appraisal; management expects loss content to improve seasonally but absolute powersports charge-offs remain elevated. A cash-flow-dependent C&I credit also contributed to higher nonperformers, driven by supply chain disruption and tariff pressures. Guidance is directional: low-to-mid single-digit loan growth for the year, margin to stay around ~5% (later trending back toward 5%), and ACL ratio to hold roughly flat as classifications resolve. Buybacks continue given strong capital flexibility.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Exceptional tax-equivalent NIM 5.14% (5 bp improvement sequentially) supporting earnings power despite credit stumbles
  • Balance sheet optimization and deposit repricing strategy as wholesale brokered CDs run off to lower funding costs
  • Loan growth targeted low-to-mid single-digit for the remainder of 2026 (pipeline building; commercial softness not expected to derail growth)

Business Development

  • Evergreen Bank Group and the prior West Suburban acquisition were cited as sources of legacy participation/syndication exposure and certain credits (context for runoff and credit noise, not new growth partnerships)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • GAAP net income $25.6M / $0.48 diluted EPS; adjusted (excluding MSR valuation and 2025 Bancorp acquisition/Evergreen costs) $26.0M / $0.49
  • Net loan charge-offs $9.8M, driven by powersports $3.9M, CRE investor downtown Chicago office $3.9M (valued ~50% lower; cash flows adequate post-restructuring), and warehousing/distribution C&I $1.3M; higher-than-normal powersports seasonality/consumer softness
  • Tangible book value per share increased to $14.35 from $14.12; tangible equity ratio up 5 bps (11.02% to 11.07%); CET1 13.13% up from 12.99% sequentially but down 34 bps vs year-ago
  • Tax-equivalent NIM 5.14%, +5 bps q/q and +26 bps vs prior-year quarter; management expects margin to trend back toward ~5% later in the year
  • Cost of deposits 105 bps vs 115 bps linked quarter; reserve/ACL ratio held roughly flat (1.39% at 3/31/26 vs 1.38% year-end; allowance $72.1M vs $72.3M)
  • Provision expense increased $6.5M to $9.5M, largely aligned to the quarter’s powersports charge-offs and the two larger credits; reserve level/ACL ratio expected to hold roughly flat going forward as classifications work through
  • Noninterest expense declined $2.7M q/q driven by acquisition-cost timing (349k vs 2.3M in prior Q4); adjusted tax-equivalent efficiency ratio 51.7% vs 51.28% in 2025
  • Loan yields: tax-equivalent loan yields down 5 bps q/q (Fed cuts working through), but +48 bps y/y; weighted average yield on new business cited at 6.6%–6.75% (down 50–75 bps vs prior quarters)
  • Loan-to-deposit ratio 93.2% vs ~94% prior quarter and 81.2% year-ago; total loans down $66.9M q/q

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Share repurchase: 1.2M shares at average $19.63 in Q1; equity reduced with $23.1M growth in treasury stock (enhanced EPS ~+$0.01)
  • Management stated it is a little more than halfway through the existing authorization and intends to remain active; stated appetite to keep buybacks at current levels subject to remaining authorization and to refile shortly once completed
  • No specific debt balance provided; sub-debt payoff discussed as partially paid down while maintaining gross dollar interest expense; capital described as strong and not requiring urgent actions

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Wholesale funding reduction: allowing legacy Evergreen brokered CDs to run off and repricing higher-cost deposits in a falling-rate environment
  • Balance sheet optimization focus to withstand interest-rate variability and diligence on commercial credit collateral shortfalls
  • Office/CRE credit handling: ~$3.5% of loan book in office with ~68% LTV on updated appraisals; $3M classified; possible pull-forward losses considered but too early to quantify
  • Powersports underwriting/process: tightened underwriting somewhat but emphasized net contribution margin and product mix (endorsed vs non-endorsed pricing)

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Margin outlook: despite Q1 volatility, management expects margin to remain around ~5% (noted as bullish near-term and targeting later-year trend back toward 5%)
  • Loan growth outlook: low-to-mid single-digit loan growth for the balance of 2026; Q1 described as soft in commercial and powersports with pipelines building
  • Net charge-off outlook (qualitative): management expects powersports loss content to trend lower due to normal seasonality, but absolute powersports charge-offs will remain elevated versus historical ā€œnormalā€ levels
  • Reserve/ACL outlook (qualitative): Brandon Rudd asked whether ACL ratio holds flat; management agreed ā€œplus or minusā€ is reasonable as classifications decline

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Credit deterioration concentrated in two relationships: office CRE (Downtown Chicago; vacancy and valuation ~50% lower) and a cash-flow-dependent C&I credit hit by supply chain disruptions and tariff issues
  • Powersports net charge-offs elevated (Q1 $3.9M; described as higher-than-normal due to seasonality and ongoing consumer lending softness); absolute losses expected to stay somewhat higher even if loss content trends down
  • Macro uncertainty: tariffs and war in Iran included in modeling; borrower reluctance for capital projects and competitive pricing pressure in commercial real estate
  • New origination yield pressure: weighted average new-business yield 6.6%–6.75% cited, down 50–75 bps vs prior quarters
  • Rate/curve uncertainty: management referenced OIS/overnight index swap rate impacts and potential mitigation as rates move back up

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Net charge-off expectations: Management said powersports losses will remain a little higher in absolute dollars because this quarter’s absolute charge-offs were elevated but loss content should trend lower from normal seasonality. For commercial office, pull-forward losses were possible but ā€œtoo early to tell.ā€
  • Buyback pace and capital flexibility: Management indicated no reason buybacks cannot continue at current levels subject to authorization remaining, and intentions to refile another authorization soon after completion. Capital was described as strong enough to pursue strategic opportunities while maintaining returns.
  • Powersports underwriting and profitability: Management tied higher charge-offs to product mix (endorsed OEMs vs non-endorsed products priced ~1 point higher) while maintaining focus on net contribution margin. They noted FICO score improvement (735 to 743) and expected mix-driven metrics to gradually normalize as the portfolio turns over.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the OSBC Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

šŸ“‹ Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for OSBC.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
šŸ“

SEC Filings (OSBC)

Ā© 2026 Stock Market Info — Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC) Financial Profile