Old Second Bancorp, Inc.

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC) Market Cap

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: James L. Eccher

Sector: Financial Services

Industry: Banks - Regional

IPO Date: 1993-11-16

Website: https://www.oldsecond.com

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Financial Services

Company Profile

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC) serves as the parent holding company for Old Second National Bank, providing a full range of community banking services. The institution offers a broad spectrum of deposit products, including demand, NOW, money market, savings, time, and individual retirement accounts, alongside certificates of deposit. Its diverse lending portfolio encompasses commercial loans, lease financing, construction loans, and commercial real estate loans. For residential clients, offerings include first and second mortgages, home equity lines of credit, and general residential real estate loans. Consumer lending options cover needs such as motor vehicle, home improvement, and signature loans, further complemented by installment and agricultural loans, and overdraft checking services. Beyond deposits and loans, Old Second provides vital financial services like safe deposit boxes, trust and wealth management, money orders, cashier's checks, foreign currency exchange, direct deposits, discount brokerage, and debit and credit cards. The company also assists with acquiring U.S. treasury notes and bonds. Embracing digital convenience, Old Second Bancorp offers online and mobile banking platforms. Corporate clients benefit from an extensive suite of cash management solutions, featuring remote and mobile deposit capture, investment sweep accounts, zero balance accounts, automated tax payments, ATM access, telephone banking, lockbox services, automated clearing house (ACH) transactions, account reconciliation, controlled disbursements, detailed and general information reporting, foreign and domestic wire transfers, and vault services for currency and coin. Furthermore, it delivers investment, agency, and custodial services to individual, corporate, and not-for-profit clients. Established in 1981 and headquartered in Aurora, Illinois, Old Second Bancorp, Inc. serves its customers through 63 banking centers located across Cook, DeKalb, DuPage, Kane, Kendall, LaSalle, and Will counties within Illinois.

Analyst Sentiment

86%
Strong Buy

From 6 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $26.33

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$23

Median

$26

High Bound

$30

Average

$26

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$26.33
▲ +4.11% Upside
Low Target
$23.00
-9% Risk
Median Target
$26.00
3% Mid
High Target
$30.00
19% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 OLD SECOND BANCORP INC (OSBC) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

OLD SECOND BANCORP INC operates as a regional/community bank focused on originating and servicing loans for retail and small-to-mid-sized business customers, funded primarily by customer deposits. The value chain is straightforward:

  • Attract deposits through branch footprint, relationship-based customer service, and competitive deposit pricing.
  • Deploy deposits into interest-earning assets—principally loans—supported by credit underwriting, ongoing monitoring, and portfolio management.
  • EARN spreads by maintaining a favorable balance between the yield on earning assets and the cost of deposits, while holding sufficient capital and liquidity.
  • Generate fee income from deposit-related and loan-related services, reinforcing the bank’s customer retention and lowering reliance on net interest income alone.

The model’s stickiness comes from relationship banking: customers often prefer continuity in credit decisions and service delivery, and switching a primary banking relationship involves friction, paperwork, and timing risk.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Bank profitability is primarily driven by net interest income (NII), supplemented by non-interest income. The monetisation mechanics are:

  • Net Interest Income (core driver): interest earned on loans and securities minus interest paid on deposits and borrowings. The margin is shaped by loan mix, deposit beta, portfolio yield, and interest rate sensitivity.
  • Non-Interest Income (stability lever): fees from services such as account fees, debit/transaction-related income, and loan servicing or origination-related fees. This diversifies earnings through activities that do not require proportional balance sheet expansion.
  • Credit costs as a profitability gate: provisions and charge-offs convert loan growth into realized earnings power only if underwriting discipline holds through the cycle.
  • Operating efficiency: personnel and overhead discipline influences efficiency ratio and supports resilient profitability even when margins compress.

For OSBC specifically, the key margin drivers typically cluster around (1) deposit cost discipline, (2) loan yield and mix, and (3) credit quality/charge-off outcomes that determine how much of gross income becomes net earnings.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

OSBC’s competitive advantage is best understood through financial-services moats: cost of deposits, relationship-driven switching costs, and credit culture reinforced by local underwriting familiarity.

  • Switching Costs (relationship banking): customers—especially small businesses—tend to consolidate banking services with institutions that provide timely underwriting and responsive servicing. This reduces churn and stabilizes core deposits.
  • Cost of Deposits / Deposit Franchise: a durable deposit base improves funding quality, helping protect net interest margins. The ability to maintain affordable deposits is often the most visible moat in regional banking.
  • Credit Culture and Local Knowledge: community/regional banks often outperform by executing conservative underwriting standards and active monitoring, particularly in markets where management has underwriting experience and granular borrower insight.

Competitive Benchmarking (industry focus vs peers)

  • Wintrust Financial (WTF) and Byline Bancorp (BY)—regional banks with similar customer sets and operating models. The differentiation for OSBC is the depth of relationship coverage in its home footprint and the emphasis on maintaining funding stability and underwriting discipline.
  • Large money-center/regional peers (e.g., major national banks that compete on scale and product breadth)—often have advantages in capital markets access and technology. OSBC’s positioning typically relies less on product variety and more on relationship execution, credit responsiveness, and operating focus.

In practice, OSBC competes most effectively where customers value speed, local decisioning, and continuity—areas where customers may perceive weaker responsiveness from more distant, centralized institutions.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, OSBC’s growth potential is less dependent on a single macro variable and more tied to structural operating capabilities:

  • Deposit and branch-based customer acquisition: expanding or sustaining a core deposit base supports asset growth without excessive increases in funding costs.
  • Commercial and consumer lending franchise: maintaining origination capacity in retail and small-to-mid-sized business lending can grow loan volumes while sustaining risk-adjusted returns, provided underwriting standards remain intact.
  • Fee income insulation: scaling treasury management, transaction-based services, and loan-related fees can reduce earnings volatility versus relying on spread income alone.
  • Credit discipline through cycles: regional banks that manage through downturns can reprice faster, protect capital, and capture market share when weaker competitors retrench.
  • Capital and efficiency leverage: consistent operating discipline enables reinvestment into the loan pipeline and technology, while protecting tangible book value and return on equity.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Credit and concentration risk: community banks can be exposed to localized economic conditions and particular borrower types. Any sustained deterioration in loan performance—especially in commercial real estate, construction, or higher-risk segments—can pressure earnings.
  • Interest rate and liquidity risk: mismatches between asset yields and deposit repricing speeds can compress margins. Deposit funding stability matters most when competition for deposits increases.
  • Regulatory capital and stress testing: bank regulations, capital requirements, and supervisory expectations affect growth capacity and balance sheet flexibility.
  • Competitive deposit pricing: maintaining a cost-efficient deposit mix can be challenging when rivals pursue funding aggressively.
  • Operational and cybersecurity risk: reliance on modern banking systems creates ongoing exposure to technology, third parties, and operational disruptions.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Market participants typically value banks using a mix of price-to-book (P/TBV), earnings multiples, and tangible return metrics rather than purely growth-oriented measures. Key valuation drivers include:

  • Return on tangible common equity and sustainability of earnings power.
  • Net interest margin resilience and the quality of the deposit base (core vs. rate-sensitive funding).
  • Credit quality trajectory (charge-offs and provision needs relative to earnings).
  • Efficiency and operating discipline (efficiency ratio and expense growth vs. revenue).
  • Capital levels that support growth while absorbing losses.

For OSBC-style regional models, the market often rewards durable deposit franchises and conservative credit outcomes, while discounting banks where earnings quality or balance sheet risk appears less predictable.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

OSBC’s long-term investment case rests on durable relationship-based switching costs, a defensible cost-of-deposits funding franchise, and an underwriting-led credit culture that can compound earnings through cycles. The primary debate centers on balancing loan growth with credit discipline, sustaining funding stability, and meeting regulatory capital expectations—factors that ultimately determine whether earnings power converts into durable tangible book value.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"OSBC reported revenue of $98.3M and net income of $25.6M in the latest quarter (EPS $0.49). YoY, revenue declined from $82.4M (2025-03-31) to $98.3M in 2026-03-31, a +19.3% YoY increase, while net income rose from $19.8M to $25.6M (+29.2% YoY). QoQ, revenue fell from $114.5M (2025-12-31) to $98.3M (−14.2%), and net income declined from $28.8M to $25.6M (−11.1%). Profitability appears volatile quarter-to-quarter: net margin improved vs the prior year’s comparable quarter (25.9% vs 24.1%), but contracted vs last quarter (26.1% vs 25.1%). Over the full 4-quarter window, margins were inconsistent—most notably, net income spiked in 2025-06-30 and then weakened in 2025-09-30 before rebounding in 2026-03-31. As a bank, balance sheet strength matters: total assets were $6.86B in the latest quarter, broadly stable vs 2025-12-31 ($6.90B) and higher than mid-2025 ($5.70B). Equity increased to $0.91B from $0.90B QoQ, indicating resilience. Net debt (proxy for leverage/interest-bearing obligations net of cash) narrowed vs 2025-12-31 ($214.9M to $155.6M; improving). Shareholder returns are strong: the stock is up 48.6% over 1 year, with a small dividend yield (~0.36–0.40% recent run-rate) contributing modestly; buybacks are not provided."

Revenue Growth

Good

Latest quarter revenue $98.3M vs $82.4M YoY: +19.3%. However QoQ revenue fell from $114.5M to $98.3M (−14.2%), indicating short-term volatility rather than steady acceleration.

Profitability

Positive

Net income $25.6M vs $19.8M YoY: +29.2%. QoQ net income decreased (−11.1%). Net margin was relatively strong YoY (~25.9% vs ~24.1%) but contracted slightly vs last quarter, with quarter-to-quarter variability across the 4-quarter period.

Cash Flow Quality

Positive

No explicit cash flow metrics were provided, but net income is positive and EPS increased YoY ($0.49 vs $0.44). Dividend yield is low (~0.36–0.39%) with payout ratio near ~12–13% in several quarters, suggesting manageable distribution, though not a high-return cash profile.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Good

Total assets were $6.86B, down slightly QoQ but well above 2025-06-30 ($5.70B). Equity improved to $0.91B from $0.90B QoQ, and net debt improved vs 2025-12-31 ($155.6M vs $214.9M), indicating improving funding posture.

Shareholder Returns

Strong

Total shareholder return profile is strong due to price momentum: 1Y change +48.6% and 6M +31.2%. Dividend yield is modest (~0.36–0.40% recent quarter run-rate) and buybacks are not shown, but the capital appreciation dominates.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Positive

Consensus target is $23 vs current price $21.93 (~+4.8% upside), implying valuation is not deeply discounted. Price momentum is strong, but implied forward upside is limited versus the near-term run rate.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

OSBC delivered an unusually strong quarter driven by exceptionally high net interest margin and credit “cleanup.” GAAP net income was $28.2M ($0.54 EPS); excluding adjusting items, $28.7M ($0.55 EPS). The headline was tax-equivalent NIM of 5.23%, up 9 bps sequentially and 38 bps YoY, attributed to along-curve SOFR/OIS rate increases and repricing of 2021–2022 vintages plus higher-yield reinvestment. Credit trends improved despite $9.2M net charge-offs, led by resolved office CRE value-deterioration on an acquired B-note and PowerSports seasonality (charge-offs down $1.1M QoQ). NPAs declined 25% and classified assets fell $16.5M; special mention dropped 30% ($40M to $27M), a leading indicator. Management maintained loan growth low-to-mid single digits and guided margin to ~5.18% in Q3 and ~5.15% in Q4, with key risk being aggressive deposit competition and uncertainty from tariffs/Ukraine on borrower behavior.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Tangible book value per share increased to $14.77 from $14.35 (QoQ); tangible equity ratio up 12 bps to 11.19%
  • Loan growth partially reversing seasonality: total loans up $60.6 million during the quarter; loan origination activity up $60 million seasonally with strong pipeline
  • PowerSports: net loan charge-offs down $1.1 million QoQ to $2.8 million; contribution margin continued trending higher and remained robust
  • National Specialty Lending: contribution margin at historical high; APR over 10% and loss rate improved to 1.80% from over 2%

Business Development

  • No named external partnerships/customers/vendors disclosed in the provided transcript

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • GAAP net income $28.2M, or $0.54 diluted EPS; excluding adjusting items, net income $28.7M, or $0.55 diluted EPS
  • Earnings impacted by $9.2M net loan charge-offs: $3.0M C&I warehousing/distribution, $2.8M commercial real estate acquired office B-note (collectability in doubt), and $2.8M PowerSports (down $1.1M vs prior quarter due to seasonality)
  • Tax-equivalent NIM (Q2): 5.23%, up 9 bps vs last quarter and up 38 bps YoY; margin upside attributed to higher along-curve rates (SOFR/OIS) and repricing of lower-yield loans/securities reinvestment
  • Deposit cost of funds: 100 bps vs 105 bps prior quarter (and 84 bps in Q2’25); loan-to-deposit ratio rose to 96.4% from 93.2% prior quarter
  • Loan yields: +12 bps QoQ (tax equivalent) and +63 bps YoY; attributed to higher short-term rates and repricing of 2021–2022-originated lower-yield loans
  • Credit quality: NPAs down 25% QoQ; classified assets down $16.5M; allowance for credit losses 1.34% of loans ($70.4M) vs 1.39% at 3/31/26 ($72.1M)
  • Provision expense: $7.5M, down $2.5M QoQ, partially driven by negative qualitative adjustment and larger charge-offs previously provided/allocated
  • Noninterest income: up $631k (+5%) QoQ and up $2.4M (+21.7%) YoY; MSR mark-to-market flat QoQ; wealth management income up $245k QoQ and $525k YoY

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Q2 share repurchases: 732k shares at average price $21.08; treasury stock reduction $15.4M
  • Year-to-date buybacks under program: 1.9M shares at average price $20.31; previously exhausted prior 5% authorization
  • New board authorization: repurchase ~2.5M shares through June 30, 2027; management expects to fully execute over the next ~12 months
  • Capital position remains strong; equity tier 1 increased to 13.28% from 13.13% QoQ but decreased 49 bps YoY due to ~ $40.2M repurchases in 2026

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Efficiency: tax-equivalent efficiency ratio adjusted to exclude core deposit intangible amortization and other items was 50.8% (vs 51.7% in Q1)
  • Branch footprint: 1 branch shuttered last month; minor go-forward expense/gains timing acknowledged (no major pipeline changes expected)
  • Cost drivers: noninterest expense up $1.0M QoQ mainly from officer incentives and employee insurance; elevated OREO expenses driven by timing of prior quarter property sale gains and legacy Evergreen GAAP insurance refunds

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Loan growth 2026 target maintained: low to mid single digits (slight bias referenced toward low end)
  • NIM/margin guidance (best-guess): Q3 ~5.18% and Q4 ~5.15%, with acknowledgment of rate sensitivity and uncertainty around deposit attrition backfill
  • Fee income outlook: low single-digit growth; mortgage banking could reach mid-single digits if pickup occurs

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Robust competition: loan and deposit pricing/structure described as aggressive beyond Fed funds/Treasury curve; margin sensitivity to deposit attrition speed
  • Macro/geopolitical and rates: tariff volatility and war in Ukraine explicitly included in modeling assumptions; borrower wait-and-see mode due to capital-project uncertainty
  • Credit tail risk remains tied to unresolved credits (commercial real estate investor charge-off still in process; C&I credit resolution expected within next quarter) despite no new issues appearing in the last couple quarters
  • Office CRE valuations pressured (steep discount to prior levels; rents declining), though management stated no classified loans in that vertical and it is ~3% of the portfolio

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Topic: Charge-off / credit migration outlook: Management highlighted a “clean-up” quarter with meaningful reductions in criticizing/classified NPAs and a 30% special mention decline; they expect seasonal normalization in PowerSports and no new surprises, while acknowledging a couple remaining credits likely resolve over the next quarter.
  • Topic: Back-half margin trajectory and drivers: Analysts asked for margin sensitivity to loan yield/delay and deposit costs. Management guided to ~5.18% (Q3) and ~5.15% (Q4), emphasizing attrition speed of effectively wholesale deposits and success in backfilling, while stating loan yields feel relatively stable in the last ~18–24 months rate regime.
  • Topic: Capital deployment and M&A appetite: Analysts probed buyback pace versus valuation sensitivity and the acquisition pipeline. Management said it is not sensitive to share price, citing excess capital and authorization scale, and indicated it will likely fully execute the repurchase plan; for M&A, they prefer franchise-value accretive deals with a bias toward smaller transactions.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the OSBC Q2 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC) Financial Profile