ProPetro Holding Corp.

ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) Market Cap

ProPetro Holding Corp. has a market capitalization of $1.36B.

Price: $11.10

0.28 (2.59%)

Market Cap: 1.36B

NYSE · time unavailable

CEO: Samuel D. Sledge

Sector: Energy

Industry: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

IPO Date: 2017-03-17

Website: https://www.propetroservices.com

ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) - Company Information

Market Cap: 1.36B|Sector: Energy

Company Profile

Based in Midland, Texas, ProPetro Holding Corp. is a dedicated provider of oilfield services. The company primarily specializes in hydraulic fracturing, offering essential support for oil and gas exploration and production. Beyond fracturing, its diverse offerings include cementing, acidizing, and coiled tubing services. Operations are structured into Pressure Pumping and All Other segments. ProPetro serves energy companies focused on the extraction of North American oil and natural gas resources. As of December 31, 2021, its robust fleet boasted 12 hydraulic fracturing units, collectively generating 1,423,000 hydraulic horsepower. The company was established in 2007.

Analyst Sentiment

91%
Strong Buy

From 12 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $17.75

▲ +59.9% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$14

Median

$17

High Bound

$23

Average

$18

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$17.75
▲ +59.91% Upside
Low Target
$14.00
26% Risk
Median Target
$17.00
53% Mid
High Target
$23.00
107% Max
Consensus
Buy
19 / 30 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ2 2026Q1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MJun 30, 2026Mar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)1,3611,7601,685990545620759961798
Enterprise Value ($M)1,4351,8341,7151,1486807138681,086923
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)-98.23-54.24-115.46334.86-57.46-21.6619.78-13.72-1.45
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)-4.181.63-1.35
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)1.175.756.223.421.851.902.113.002.21
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)1.421.841.701.190.660.750.921.180.96
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)-60.54304.98-41.4667.11-228.9236.3155.1295.91-133.48
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)6.006.343.962.312.192.423.392.56
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)8.8547.3950.5023.5316.7117.6714.2037.20-7.55
Debt to Equity Ratio0.460.900.190.300.240.200.210.210.21

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 PROPETRO HOLDING CORP (PUMP) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

ProPetro is a U.S.-focused oilfield services provider centered on pressure pumping and well stimulation, delivering stimulation services that enable producers to complete and sustain production from unconventional reservoirs. The operating model is asset- and execution-driven: ProPetro contracts with upstream operators to perform multi-stage well services using pressure pumping fleets (blenders/irrigation equipment, pumps, and related infrastructure) and trained field personnel. Revenue is generated per service execution, while profitability depends on equipment availability, fleet utilization, and the efficiency of scheduling, sourcing, and execution across locations.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

  • Transactional, job-based stimulation revenue: Pricing is typically tied to the scope and intensity of stimulation work (e.g., stages/meters pumped, horsepower/fleet usage, and field-specific inputs), resulting in revenue that moves with drilling and completion activity.
  • Operational leverage through utilization: While contracts are largely transactional, margins improve when fleets are kept busy and downtime is minimized. Better fleet planning converts fixed and semi-fixed cost bases into higher incremental margins.
  • Margin drivers: (1) service pricing and customer mix, (2) logistics efficiency (staging, turnaround times, and transport), (3) input procurement and blending efficiency, and (4) labor productivity and safety performance that reduces operational disruptions.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

ProPetro’s competitive position is best characterized as a combination of execution moat and operational switching costs, supported by asset ownership and geographic responsiveness.

  • High switching costs / qualification friction: Upstream operators award stimulation work based on track record, safety performance, quality of execution, and operational reliability. Requalification and performance risk discourage frequent provider changes, increasing customer stickiness for active programs.
  • Asset-intensity and fleet economics: Owning and operating stimulation fleets creates a scale advantage in planning and execution, with the ability to optimize utilization and maintenance schedules. Competitors that must rely on higher-cost outsourcing or intermittent availability face margin headwinds.
  • Logistical infrastructure in core basins: ProPetro’s focus on major North American unconventional regions supports faster deployment and improved turnaround efficiency through established field operations and supply coordination (equipment staging, local sourcing, and crew readiness).

Competitive benchmarking: Major integrated service providers—Halliburton, Schlumberger, and Baker Hughes—compete across broader international and service lines, often mixing stimulation with a diversified portfolio. ProPetro’s positioning differs by emphasizing U.S. land stimulation execution and operational focus rather than a fully diversified global platform.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

  • Unconventional resource development persists: The need for stimulation services remains structurally linked to maintaining well productivity and inventory development in North American shale plays.
  • Stimulation intensity and well complexity: Longer laterals, higher stage counts, and evolving completion designs typically support greater demand for pumping hours and service execution per well, even when drilling pace varies.
  • Operational outsourcing and specialization: Upstream operators often rely on specialized service providers for capacity, reliability, and throughput—particularly when execution speed and safety performance are critical.
  • TAM expansion through completions optimization: As operators optimize well economics, stimulation programs can shift in mix and design, sustaining demand for providers that can execute efficiently across changing job parameters.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Cyclical customer capex: Stimulation activity is closely tied to upstream drilling and completion budgets, which respond to commodity price levels and capital availability.
  • Utilization and pricing pressure: During slower activity periods, industry capacity can exceed demand, leading to utilization declines and pricing concessions.
  • Capital intensity and fleet management: Maintenance, rebuilds, and capacity additions require disciplined capital allocation; overbuilding relative to market demand can impair returns.
  • Regulatory and environmental compliance: Water handling, emissions controls, chemical disclosure, and local permitting requirements can increase costs and constrain operating flexibility.
  • Execution and safety risk: Operational disruptions, mechanical failures, or safety incidents can reduce throughput and lead to reputational or contractual consequences.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Oilfield services are typically valued on cash flow capacity through EV/EBITDA or enterprise value multiples, with meaningful emphasis on cycle-adjusted profitability and operating leverage. Market expectations generally move with:

  • Utilization and margin trajectory: Incremental margins expand as fleets operate closer to capacity.
  • Customer activity visibility: Contract mix and the durability of completion demand influence earnings durability assumptions.
  • Balance sheet resilience: Leverage and liquidity affect how well the company can fund fleet upkeep and absorb downturn pricing.
  • Operational reliability metrics: Consistent execution tends to support pricing power and re-contracting with key operators.

Given the sector’s cyclicality, investors typically differentiate providers based on fleet efficiency, cost structure, and ability to maintain competitive position through downturns.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

ProPetro’s long-term value proposition rests on stimulation execution capability, fleet utilization economics, and customer stickiness driven by qualification and operational switching costs. In North American unconventional basins, stimulation demand is supported by structural well maintenance requirements and ongoing completion complexity. The primary investment challenge is managing the service cycle—specifically utilization swings and pricing pressure—while preserving fleet economics and compliance discipline.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for PUMP.

marketbeat.com2026-07-30

ProPetro Q2 Earnings Call Highlights

ProPetro NYSE: PUMP reported second-quarter 2026 revenue of $306 million, up 13% from the prior quarter, while its net loss widened to $8 million, or $0.07 per diluted share, from a $4 million loss in the first quarter. Adjusted EBITDA rose 23% sequentially to $45 million, equal to 15% of revenue.

seekingalpha.com2026-07-29

ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

zacks.com2026-07-29

Compared to Estimates, ProPetro (PUMP) Q2 Earnings: A Look at Key Metrics

The headline numbers for ProPetro (PUMP) give insight into how the company performed in the quarter ended June 2026, but it may be worthwhile to compare some of its key metrics to Wall Street estimates and the year-ago actuals.

zacks.com2026-07-29

ProPetro Holding (PUMP) Reports Q2 Loss, Tops Revenue Estimates

ProPetro Holding (PUMP) came out with a quarterly loss of $0.07 per share versus the Zacks Consensus Estimate of a loss of $0.01. This compares to a loss of $0.07 per share a year ago.

zacks.com2026-07-29

Down 25.7% in 4 Weeks, Here's Why ProPetro (PUMP) Looks Ripe for a Turnaround

ProPetro (PUMP) is technically in oversold territory now, so the heavy selling pressure might have exhausted. This along with strong agreement among Wall Street analysts in raising earnings estimates could lead to a trend reversal for the stock.

businesswire.com2026-07-29

ProPetro Reports Financial Results for the Second Quarter of 2026

MIDLAND, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)--ProPetro Reports Financial Results for the Second Quarter of 2026.

zacks.com2026-07-23

Factors You Need to Know Ahead of ProPetro's Q2 Earnings Release

PUMP heads into Q2 results with rising earnings estimates as improving Permian activity and cost discipline could offset lower expected revenues.

zacks.com2026-07-22

ProPetro Holding (PUMP) Expected to Beat Earnings Estimates: What to Know Ahead of Q2 Release

ProPetro (PUMP) possesses the right combination of the two key ingredients for a likely earnings beat in its upcoming report. Get prepared with the key expectations.

businesswire.com2026-07-14

ProPetro Announces Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Call

MIDLAND, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)--ProPetro Announces Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Call.

fool.com2026-07-13

Borr Drilling vs. ProPetro: Which Energy Stock Profits From Higher Prices in 2026?

Borr Drilling maintains a modern fleet of high-specification jack-up rigs for international offshore energy projects. ProPetro holds a strong regional presence in the Permian Basin, focusing on hydraulic fracturing and completion services.

fool.com2026-06-18

ProPetro vs. Expion360: Is an Old Energy or New Energy Stock the Way to Go?

ProPetro maintains a massive service presence in the Permian Basin and has successfully navigated industry downturns to remain cash-flow positive. Expion360 is delivering rapid revenue growth as it scales its lithium battery technology across the recreational vehicle and marine markets.

businesswire.com2026-05-04

ProPetro Holding Corp. Prices Upsized $600 Million Convertible Senior Notes Offering

MIDLAND, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)--ProPetro Holding Corp. Prices Upsized $600 Million Convertible Senior Notes Offering.

zacks.com2026-05-04

ProPetro Holding Posts Narrower-Than-Expected Q1 Loss, Sales Beat

PUMP expects 2026 capital expenditures of $540-$610 million, while PROPWR anticipates capital spending of approximately $400-$450 million.

businesswire.com2026-05-04

ProPetro Holding Corp. Announces Proposed Convertible Senior Notes Offering to Optimize Capital Structure

MIDLAND, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)--ProPetro Holding Corp. Announces Proposed Convertible Senior Notes Offering to Optimize Capital Structure.

seekingalpha.com2026-04-30

ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-06-30

"PUMP reported Q2’26 revenue of $305.8M and net income of -$8.1M (EPS -$0.066). On a YoY basis, revenue decreased -6.3% versus Q2’25 ($326.2M) while net income improved from -$7.2M to -$8.1M (net income change of -12.0%, still loss-making). QoQ, revenue rose +12.8% from Q1’26 ($270.7M), but losses widened: net income fell from -$3.6M to -$8.1M. Profitability deteriorated over the last four quarters: gross margin contracted to ~9.3% in Q2’26 from ~11.7% in Q4’25 and ~9.1% in Q2’25, while operating margin remained negative (Q2’26: -1.6%; Q4’25: +1.7%). Interest expense stayed modest relative to revenue, but the company’s operating loss and negative net margin (-2.7%) persist. Cash flow quality is mixed but improving sequentially: operating cash flow (OCF) was $67.1M in Q2’26 versus $2.7M in Q1’26, with a slightly positive free cash flow of $5.8M (after $61.4M capex). Balance sheet liquidity strengthened dramatically as cash jumped to $784.0M from $156.6M in Q1’26, though leverage remains meaningful with total debt $857.9M and retained earnings still negative. Shareholder returns appear strongly positive: the stock is up +169% over 1 year, and there’s no dividend. Total shareholder return is therefore momentum-driven rather than fundamentals-driven, warranting a cautious valuation/credit risk stance."

Revenue Growth

Fair

QoQ revenue increased +12.8% ($270.7M to $305.8M), but YoY revenue declined -6.3% ($326.2M to $305.8M), indicating a choppy trajectory.

Profitability

Neutral

Net margin remains negative and worsened QoQ (-1.35% in Q1’26 to -2.65% in Q2’26). Gross margin is lower than Q4’25 (~11.7%) and operating margin is consistently below zero.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

OCF improved sharply to $67.1M QoQ (from $2.7M). Free cash flow turned positive but thin ($5.8M). No dividends and losses mean durability of cash generation is still unproven.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Neutral

Liquidity strengthened materially (cash $784.0M in Q2’26 vs $156.6M in Q1’26). However, leverage remains elevated with total debt $857.9M and equity still pressured (retained earnings -$79.8M).

Shareholder Returns

Strong

Strong capital appreciation: +168.98% 1-year change. No dividend; buybacks not evident in the latest quarter.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Caution

Despite momentum, fundamentals are weak (negative EPS; price-to-earnings not meaningful). Valuation multiples appear elevated versus profitability, raising risk.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

Q2 2026 results showed resilience: revenue of $306M (+13% QoQ) and adjusted EBITDA of $45M (15% of revenue, +23% sequentially), with operating cash flow rising to $66M from $3M. The quarter’s negative net loss swing was attributed to weather disruptions, off-Permian downtime on a customer program, and new fleet ramp costs. Management simultaneously laid out a tightening completions backdrop—next-gen natural gas-burning fleets described as effectively sold out and renewals clustered in the next 6–9 months—while targeting a late-Q3 contribution from a 13th fleet. For PROPWR, the key milestone is commercial: committed power rose from ~240 MW to 350 MW under contract, plus >100 MW in advanced negotiations. Financing is positioned as low near-term cash stress: $784M cash, ~$905M liquidity, and a recently upsized CAT facility, alongside $690M 0% convertible notes (no dilution until $29.49). Data center contracting is moving slower than expected but management expects meaningful earnings inflection in H2’26 into 2027.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Completions: 13th frac fleet activation expected to begin contributing toward the end of Q3 2026 (net add; new customer/top-tier E&P); improved pricing momentum especially for next-generation natural gas-burning fleets.
  • PROPWR: contracted power generation capacity increased from ~240 MW to 350 MW committed under contract; additional ~110 MW contracted across 2 separate projects (leading integrated Permian upstream operator + separate industrial customer).
  • PROPWR: advanced negotiations for additional >100 MW to support other oil and gas operations; commissioning progress evidenced by positive EBITDA in each of the final 2 months of the quarter.

Business Development

  • PROPWR + Caterpillar: strategic framework agreement includes highly efficient, stationary, large natural gas engines purpose-built for data centers/high-density applications; referenced as a key visibility lever on equipment deliveries and deployment timelines.
  • PROPWR contracted projects: ~110 MW across 2 separate projects (one with a leading integrated upstream operator in the Permian Basin; one with a separate industrial customer).
  • PROPWR pipeline: several hundred megawatts in advanced negotiations with data center developers/operators (noted as longer contract structuring; multiple counterparties engaged).

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Reported Q2 2026 total revenue: $306 million (+13% QoQ).
  • Net loss: $8 million (-$0.07 diluted EPS) vs net loss $4 million (-$0.03 diluted EPS) in prior quarter (worsened by weather disruption, fleet deployment costs, and temporary off-Permian customer project downtime).
  • Adjusted EBITDA: $45 million (15% of revenue), +23% sequentially; includes ~$16 million of lease expense related to electric fleets.
  • Operating cash flow: $66 million vs $3 million prior quarter; working capital tailwinds described as ~+$20 million source of cash in Q2 vs ~-$32 million cash consumed in Q1.
  • Capitalized spend: capex paid $61 million; capex incurred $71 million (completions ~$24 million; PROPWR equipment orders ~$47 million).
  • Full-year 2026 capex incurred guidance: $525 million to $595 million (midpoint lowered vs prior $540 million to $610 million range).
  • Completions capex guidance: ~$125 million to $145 million (down from prior ~$140 million to $160 million) driven by FORCE electric fleet buyout timing (second buyout shifted into early 2027).
  • PROPWR 2026 capex guidance: ~$400 million to $450 million (unchanged); capital excludes financing cash outflow effects; prior guidance also reiterated $1.4M to $1.5M per megawatt inclusive of balance of plant unchanged.
  • No explicit bps margin/price bps changes were provided; margin-level commentary was limited to adjusted EBITDA as % of revenue (15%).

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Convertible notes: raised $690 million aggregate principal amount in May; 0% coupon; no dilution until stock price reaches $29.49 per share (after capped call).
  • Total raised: approximately $1.5 billion over past 18 months to fund PROPWR growth.
  • Cash and equivalents (6/30/2026): $784 million.
  • Borrowings under Caterpillar Financial Services financing agreement: $130 million; facility recently upsized to $167 million cap, with amounts syndication-able by CAT not counting against the $167 million cap.
  • Liquidity at end of Q2 2026: $905 million (cash + $121 million available ABL capacity).
  • No outstanding borrowings under ABL credit facility.
  • Funding match framing (analyst question answered): management stated liquidity exceeds 2026 announced capex needs by “hundreds of millions of dollars,” with completions free cash flow + CAT finance + existing liquidity expected to cover a significant portion of 2026 capex.

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Completions fleet operations: active fleet count increased from 11 to 12 in Q2; 13th fleet planned activation for late Q3 contribution; new fleet requires upfront maintenance/deployment costs before full earnings benefit.
  • Temporary off-Permian deployment for a limited-scope frac program for a long-standing customer experienced significant unexpected downtime before returning to the Permian Basin.
  • Weather impact: severe weather across the Permian in June caused operational disruptions impacting quarterly results.
  • Force electric fleet buyouts timing: first planned buyout now expected to complete in 2026 at $15M to $20M; second shifting into early 2027 (intent to ultimately purchase all 5 FORCE electric fleets unchanged).
  • Capital reserved/included in completions guidance: refurbishing portion of existing Tier 4 DGB fleet; investments in fleet automation technology; measured investments in direct drive gas frac units.
  • PROPWR operational execution: live/deployed behind-the-meter prime power on a data center project meeting performance obligations; positive EBITDA in each of the final 2 months of the quarter.

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Permian rig count nearly 10% off its first-quarter low (Baker Hughes) cited as a leading indicator supporting improved market conditions.
  • Next-generation natural gas-burning fleets described as effectively sold out industry-wide; Tier 2 diesel equipment increasingly limited; most active frac horsepower contracted with renewals scheduled over next 6 to 9 months.
  • Company estimate of Permian frac fleet count: currently mid-70s; management expects it is “very challenging” to see active fleet count above mid-80s without meaningful reinvestment/growth rather than replacement capacity; management does not expect that growth reinvestment to materialize.
  • PROPWR: management reiterated expectation to begin generating increasingly meaningful earnings during the second half of 2026 and into 2027 as deployments accelerate.
  • Pipeline timing: contracted capacity trajectory discussed as 350 MW today moving toward 450 MW soon; data center contracts expected to “round out” capacity into 2028 (with contracts/deployment schedules evaluated carefully).
  • No explicit numeric earnings-per-share or margin bps targets were given beyond $/MW and pipeline MW milestones.

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Operational disruptions: severe Permian weather in June and unexpected downtime from a temporary off-Permian customer project reduced quarter performance.
  • New fleet ramp costs: standing up additional fleet (Q2 went 11 to 12) includes upfront maintenance/deployment costs before full earnings benefit.
  • Contracting timeline risk: management noted data center negotiations are taking longer than originally anticipated due to long-term commitments, significant capital on both sides, and careful risk allocation/contract structure work.
  • Macro/geopolitical uncertainty: ongoing conflict in the Middle East cited as creating significant macroeconomic uncertainty (though early observations were described as positive for this business).
  • Demand/pricing sustainability: management’s optimism relies on market tightening, replacement barriers, and contract renewals over next 6 to 9 months; any demand pause could affect re-contracting economics.

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Liquidity and 12-month funding needs for PROPWR: Management said near-to-medium-term funding needs are not expected, emphasizing that full-year capex of $525M-$595M is covered by existing liquidity (> $900M), Caterpillar finance capacity, and completions free cash flow. They reiterated opportunistic capital raising without changing the long-run plan.
  • Data center contracting progress and segment mix: Management described several hundred MW in advanced negotiations, with delays tied to long-term deal complexity and risk allocation. They stated the plan remains to deploy the majority of future power capacity into data centers, while oil & gas deals are “shorter term but higher economics,” supporting execution.
  • Completions fleet decisioning and top-tier pricing: Management characterized the 13th fleet as a net add tied to a top-tier blue-chip E&P making “high grades.” They said price/returns are strong due to counterparty execution and performance obligations, and it reflects ProPetro execution rather than a generic market-growth story.

Sentiment: POSITIVE

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the PUMP Q2 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for PUMP.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (PUMP)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) Financial Profile