Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) Market Cap

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. has a market capitalization of โ€”.

No quote data available.

CEO: Daniel E. Clara

Sector: Consumer Cyclical

Industry: Auto - Dealerships

IPO Date: 2002-03-21

Website: https://www.asburyauto.com

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Consumer Cyclical

Company Profile

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as an automotive retailer in the United States. It offers a range of automotive products and services, including new and used vehicles; and vehicle repair and maintenance services, replacement parts, and collision repair services. The company also provides finance and insurance products, including arranging vehicle financing through third parties; and aftermarket products, such as extended service contracts, guaranteed asset protection debt cancellation, prepaid maintenance, and credit life and disability insurance. As of December 31, 2021, the company owned and operated 205 new vehicle franchises representing 31 brands of automobiles at 155 dealership locations; and 35 collision centers in the United States. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. was founded in 1996 and is headquartered in Duluth, Georgia.

Analyst Sentiment

55%
Hold

From 11 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $226.50

โ–ฒ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$202

Median

$225

High Bound

$254

Average

$227

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

๐ŸŽฏ Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$226.50
โ–ฒ +18.60% Upside
Low Target
$202.00
6% Risk
Median Target
$225.00
18% Mid
High Target
$254.00
33% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

๐Ÿ“˜ Full Research Report

โ„น๏ธ

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

๐Ÿ“˜ ASBURY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP INC (ABG) โ€” Investment Overview

๐Ÿงฉ Business Model Overview

Asbury Automotive Group operates a dealership platform focused on selling and servicing passenger vehicles through franchise agreements with OEMs. The core value chain is straightforward: dealerships source inventory from manufacturers and maintain local customer access through showrooms, sales teams, financing arrangements, and ongoing service/parts operations.

The model is reinforced by a multi-year customer relationship: consumers typically cycle from new/used vehicle purchase to recurring service visits, warranty/maintenance work, and parts purchases. Service and parts provide durability relative to retail vehicle sales, which are driven by consumer demand and credit conditions.

๐Ÿ’ฐ Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue typically splits into (1) vehicle sales (new and used), (2) aftersales (service, parts, collision where applicable), and (3) finance and insurance (F&I) and related income tied to customer financing penetration. Monetisation depends on the ability to manage inventory turns and pricing discipline in vehicle sales while sustaining high attach rates for service and parts.

  • Vehicle sales margins: influenced by new-vehicle OEM incentives, used-vehicle pricing, and inventory availability. Earnings power is sensitive to wholesale-retail spreads and volume.
  • Aftermarket margins: supported by installed customer base, service scheduling convenience, and parts availability; margins generally exhibit greater stability than vehicle sales.
  • F&I income: linked to credit underwriting volumes and product penetration (extended service contracts, warranties, and insurance products), with profitability tied to underwriting quality and administrative control.

๐Ÿง  Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

ABG competes primarily within the U.S. franchise dealership model, where scale and execution matter more than brand marketing. The relevant moats are:

  • Intangible assets (local operating muscle): dealership footprints create routine customer access and service convenience, supporting repeat business for maintenance and repairs.
  • Cost advantages via scale: larger dealer groups can leverage purchasing, shared back-office systems, training, and procurement efficiencies for parts and operations.
  • Switching frictions (relationship-based economics): service history, warranty workflows, and familiarity with technicians and parts availability reduce customer willingness to switch frequently to distant competitors.
  • Aftersales attach as a stabiliser: high service utilization and parts sales help dampen cyclicality from new/used vehicle pricing.

Competitive benchmarking: ABGโ€™s direct peer set includes Lithia & Driveway (LAD), Penske Automotive Group (PAG), and Group 1 Automotive (GPI).

All three operate diversified dealership platforms across multiple markets and OEM brands. The difference between ABG and these rivals typically lies in (1) geographic density and market share within overlapping trade areas, (2) mix of OEM brands and relative new/used sales efficiency, and (3) aftersales performance and expense discipline. ABGโ€™s positioning derives from sustaining a service-and-parts-led relationship base while leveraging group-level cost efficiencies.

๐Ÿš€ Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5โ€“10 year horizon, growth is less about adopting a new technology stack and more about harvesting structural advantages within dealership economics:

  • Installed base growth: continued vehicle population expansion and periodic replacement cycles support aftermarket demand (service and parts) and recurring customer touchpoints.
  • Aftersales penetration: improving technician productivity, service scheduling capacity, and parts availability can raise attach rates and stabilize earnings through the cycle.
  • Dealer consolidation economics: disciplined integration of acquired stores and amortization of shared systems can yield sustained cost leverage versus smaller operators.
  • Mix and product evolution: growth in higher-complexity service categories (e.g., ADAS-related maintenance, safety inspections, collision repair capabilities where offered) can increase aftersales revenue per customer, provided training and parts supply keep pace.
  • OEM model durability with franchise frameworks: the franchise system and local dealership licensing create barriers to entry that typically favor incumbent operators with established facilities and compliance track records.

โš  Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Vehicle cycle and spread compression: earnings can be pressured when wholesale and retail prices converge, when OEM incentives rise unevenly, or when demand weakens due to macro conditions.
  • Interest-rate sensitivity: consumer financing availability and affordability affect both unit volumes and F&I profitability.
  • OEM inventory allocation and program risk: shifts in OEM allocation, warranty policy economics, or franchise standards can alter unit economics and aftersales reimbursement.
  • Regulatory and franchise law changes: changes to dealership franchise protections, transparency requirements, or OEM direct-sales/agency structures can affect long-term economics.
  • Fixed-cost leverage and labor/parts inflation: service department profitability depends on maintaining throughput and managing wage and parts cost pressures.
  • Capital intensity of expansion: growth through new rooftops and acquisitions requires disciplined capital allocation, with execution risk in integration and local market positioning.

๐Ÿ“Š Valuation & Market View

The market commonly values dealership groups using EV/EBITDA and earnings multiples that reflect (1) normalized service and parts contribution, (2) resilience through credit and vehicle pricing cycles, and (3) quality of F&I penetration and expense discipline.

Key valuation drivers typically include sustainable aftersales margins, demonstrable inventory and pricing management, and evidence of disciplined capital returns (including acquisition underwriting). When investor focus shifts toward earnings quality and downside protection from aftersales, multiples can expand; when spreads and unit volumes compress, valuation tends to reflect higher cyclicality risk.

๐Ÿ” Investment Takeaway

ABGโ€™s long-term investment case rests on the durability of the franchise dealership model, where customer relationships generate recurring aftersales cash flows and operational scale supports cost advantages. The principal challenge is managing cyclical exposure in vehicle sales while maintaining service/parts profitability and F&I underwriting discipline. If execution sustains stable aftersales economics and disciplined growth, ABG can compound through both consolidation and the steady expansion of the installed vehicle base.


โš  AI-generated โ€” informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

๐Ÿ“Š AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"ABG reported Q1โ€™26 revenue of $4.11B and net income of $187.8M (EPS $9.88). On a YoY basis, revenue rose from $4.15B in Q1โ€™25 to $4.11B in Q1โ€™26 (about -0.9% YoY), while net income increased from $132.1M to $187.8M (+42.2% YoY). Sequentially, revenue fell from $4.68B in Q4โ€™25 to $4.11B in Q1โ€™26 (-12.1% QoQ) but net income improved from $60.0M to $187.8M (+213.0% QoQ). Profitability strengthened meaningfully versus the prior year: net profit margin expanded from 3.18% (Q1โ€™25) to 4.57% (Q1โ€™26), and operating margin rose from 5.65% to 4.71%โ€”showing better bottom-line conversion despite some volatility in operating profit. Gross margin was roughly stable (~17.5% vs. ~17.5% prior year). Cash flow quality appears solid for the quarter: operating cash flow was $223.2M and free cash flow was $223.2M (CapEx reported as $0), with no dividends or buybacks shown in Q1โ€™26. Balance sheet resilience is mixed: cash is low at $25.3M, but the company carries substantial current assets; leverage indicators are volatile across quarters due to reporting changes. Total shareholder returns look modest at the stock level (1Y change -2.46%) with no yield or confirmed buyback contribution in Q1โ€™26. Analyst consensus targets ($238 vs. ~$211) imply upside, but the market has not shown strong momentum."

Revenue Growth

Caution

Revenue was $4.11B in Q1โ€™26, down -12.1% QoQ (-0.9% YoY). The top line is slightly soft YoY and declines sequentially.

Profitability

Positive

Net income increased +42.2% YoY and +213.0% QoQ. Net margin expanded to 4.57% from 3.18% (YoY), indicating improved bottom-line conversion. Gross margin is roughly stable (~17.5%).

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Q1โ€™26 operating cash flow was $223.2M and free cash flow was $223.2M (CapEx reported as $0). No dividends or buybacks are reflected in Q1โ€™26, so cash returns to shareholders are unclear.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Caution

Cash and cash equivalents were only $25.3M at 2026-03-31. While the latest quarter shows lower reported total assets ($3.04B), earlier quarters show much higher totals; leverage/resilience metrics may be impacted by reporting classification, limiting confidence.

Shareholder Returns

Fair

Stock momentum is weak: 1Y change -2.46%. Dividend yield is 0 in the dataset, and no buyback/dividend cash flows were shown for Q1โ€™26, so total return support is limited.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

Consensus price target is $238 vs. current ~$211 (implied upside ~12.7%). Valuation multiples in the ratios appear relatively low vs Q4โ€™25, but trends across quarters are inconsistent due to reporting volatility.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

ABGโ€™s Q1 2026 results reflect a profitable but noisy quarter: gross margin expanded 22 bps to 17.7% and adjusted EPS was $5.37. The key earnings overhang was noncash TCA deferral (-$0.26/share) and severe winter weather (estimated -$0.56 EPS; $19M gross profit). Underneath, used-vehicle performance held up wellโ€”used PVR rose 16% YoY and used retail gross profit per unit increased 12% to $1,828โ€”supported by a consistent GPU execution trend. The dominant strategic driver remains the Tekion DMS migration: >50% of stores are live and management expects full conversion by fall, but near-term efficiencies remain pressured while stores reacclimate over a 4โ€“6 month period. Management expects SG&A to normalize to mid-60s (excluding weather) and sees Tekion inefficiency peak late 2Q into 3Q. Capital allocation was active: $147M repurchased 678k shares funded partly by divesting $600M annualized revenue. Macro risk is the bigger swing factor, especially around consumer confidence and Stellantis.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Tekion DMS migration progress: >50% of stores on Tekion; management expects full conversion by fall, enabling later cost/efficiency benefits after a 4โ€“6 month productivity โ€œmuscle memoryโ€ period
  • Parts & Service turnaround via DMS-driven productivity: Koons (converted last summer) showed gross dollars per technician +21% YoY and service advisor productivity +16% YoY; support cost decreased 5% in converted stores
  • Used-vehicle profitability resilience: used retail gross profit per unit +12% YoY to $1,828; used PVR $1,847 (+5% sequential, +16% YoY); sequential GPU progress in 6 of last 7 quarters
  • F&I/Total Cost of Ownership tooling: TCA nonres deferral impact of $45; management stated progress to implement TCA in โ€œtimber storesโ€ by year-end and complete rollout across all platforms

Business Development

  • Tekion (DMS platform migration) as the core technology partner
  • Herb Chambers integration: Tekion rollout began last month; by June, Chambers expected to be completely converted (2โ€“4 stores already in ~20% range; remaining stores converting in May/June; stated 8 more converting in June)
  • Koons dealerships converted last summer; early read-through used in service productivity metrics reported for March
  • Portfolio actions: divested 10 dealerships and a collision center; terminated 7 franchises including exiting Alfa Romeo and Maserati brands

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Revenue $4.1B; gross profit $727M; gross margin 17.7% with 22 bps expansion
  • Adjusted operating margin 5%; adjusted EPS $5.37
  • TCA noncash deferral headwind: -$0.26 per share; adjusted EPS would have been $5.63 without this deferral impact
  • Weather impact estimated at $19M gross profit and $0.56 EPS in the quarter
  • Divestiture impact: net gain on divestitures of $94M (net of tax), plus Tekion implementation expenses $5M, weather-related losses $3M, duplicate DMS related expenses $1M excluded from adjusted earnings
  • Adjusted tax rate 25.1%; full-year 2026 effective tax rate estimated ~25%
  • Capex: $46M spent in Q1 (excluding real estate purchases); still expects ~$250M CapEx spend for both 2026 and 2027

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Share repurchase: $147M used to repurchase 678,000 shares (demand/price dislocation rationale stated)
  • Ended Q1 with $1.2B liquidity (floor plan offset accounts, used line and revolver availability, and cash excluding Total Care Auto cash)
  • Transaction-adjusted net leverage ratio: 3.2x at quarter end
  • Adjusted operating cash flow: $166M; adjusted free cash flow: $120M
  • Diluted share count ~18.6M shares prior to future buybacks

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Tekion conversion pace: โ€œover 50%โ€ of stores running on Tekion; anticipate fully converted by fall of 2026
  • Near-term margin/efficiency friction expected to remain elevated in 1H due to peak store count and integration disruption; management expects productivity efficiencies to return in months 4โ€“6
  • SG&A normalization signal: March adjusted same-store SG&A in the low 60s; management indicated steady-state mid-60s excluding weather headwinds (and without DMS transition productivity drag)
  • New day supply: 54 days end of March (management views as supportive of gross profit per unit); used DSI improved to 30 days from 35 days at Q4 2025
  • Parts & Service efficiency recovery timeline explicitly tied to Tekion behavioral learning curve (4โ€“6 months)

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • 2Q Tekion transition timing: stack of all stores suggests the Tekion inefficiency peak is likely late 2Q into 3Q; by some point in 4Q, more stores should pass the 4โ€“6 month window
  • SG&A guidance framing: management comfortable with mid-60s SG&A as a percentage of gross profit going forward; expects Tekion efficiencies to begin approaching mid-60s in the back half (timing between Q4 and later not precisely specified)
  • Consumer/macro: management expects continued slowdown into April similar to March; longer gasoline-war duration could increase impact; did not provide numeric revenue/unit guidance

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Severe winter weather: same-store unit softness and profitability headwind; management quantified weather as ~$500 range impact on same-store basis and ~$13M on fixed revenue metrics; plus $19M gross profit and $0.56 EPS in consolidated estimates
  • Geopolitical/gasoline price and war-driven consumer confidence uncertainty: management noted slowdown in new car sales into April and cautioned on predictive uncertainty
  • Tekion conversion friction: temporary disruption including store closures during conversion (conversion weekend plus Monday โ€œlost dayโ€ stated), and productivity drag expected to take 4โ€“6 months to overcome
  • Domestic OEM headwind (Stellantis): Dan cited the biggest impact on domestic side is Stellantis-related inventory turn and gross profit maximization pressure
  • Warranty volatility: management cited a major warranty comp year-over-year and said warranty outcomes from OEMs are largely outside dealer group control, limiting visibility

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Weather vs. macro vs. Tekion: management quantified weather hit on same-store basis (~$500 range) and fixed revenue (~$13M), described January/February as โ€œroughโ€ with lack of recovery post mid-January storm, and noted March/April momentum, while declining to quantify exact Tekion unit-day loss beyond describing the conversion weekend plus Monday closure and 4โ€“6 months to efficiency.
  • Tekion cost/inefficiency timing and SG&A steady state: management said transition โ€œstackโ€ likely peaks late 2Q into 3Q, with implementation cost in a similar ballpark to 1Q, possibly slightly lighter in 2Q, and expects SG&A to settle around mid-60s without weather; Tekion efficiencies may start driving closer to mid-60s in the back half.
  • Buyback ramp logic amid near-term EBITDA softness: management linked Q1 buyback activity to proceeds from store dispositions and to ongoing share-price dislocation, stating confidence that EBITDA should rise dramatically in the back half once Tekion rollout is behind them, while also balancing leverage ratio and repurchase pace.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the ABG Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
ยฉ 2026 Stock Market Info โ€” Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) Financial Profile