Open Lending Corporation

Open Lending Corporation (LPRO) Market Cap

Open Lending Corporation has a market capitalization of $371.5M.

Price: $3.14

0.00 (0.00%)

Market Cap: 371.53M

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: Jessica Elizabeth Buss

Sector: Financial Services

Industry: Financial - Credit Services

IPO Date: 2018-03-26

Website: https://www.openlending.com

Open Lending Corporation (LPRO) - Company Information

Market Cap: 371.53M|Sector: Financial Services

Company Profile

Based in Austin, Texas, and established in 2000, Open Lending Corporation delivers specialized solutions for empowering lending operations and conducting risk analysis. Their services are utilized by a diverse range of financial institutions throughout the United States, including credit unions, regional banks, independent auto finance companies, and the captive finance arms of original equipment manufacturers. A key offering is their Software as a Service (SaaS) platform, known as the Lenders Protection Program (LPP). This innovative platform assists external lenders by streamlining the process of making loan decisions and automating underwriting. It also facilitates the provision of credit default insurance through affiliated insurance providers. The LPP suite incorporates functionalities such as in-depth loan data analysis, dynamic risk-adjusted pricing for loans, sophisticated risk forecasting models, and intelligent automated decision-making tools, all tailored for the automotive lending industry.

Analyst Sentiment

50%
Hold

From 7 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $3.15

▲ +0.3% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$3

Median

$3

High Bound

$3

Average

$3

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$3.15
▲ +0.32% Upside
Low Target
$3.15
0% Risk
Median Target
$3.15
0% Mid
High Target
$3.15
0% Max
Consensus
Hold
4 / 12 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)372147184249231330712730663
Enterprise Value ($M)2724795211139234613625561
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)-69.93-80.1327.10-8.2455.75132.69-1.23126.4557.20
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)-13.5314.830.93
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)4.167.189.5010.329.1313.52-12.5231.0924.80
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)4.911.952.453.422.934.139.123.313.06
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)-520.35-139.8139.35-43.51165.35-74.19-157.0670.40-265.86
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)2.314.928.755.519.61-10.7726.6021.00
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)61.5731.2528.83-46.6733.8361.60-8.14111.9174.91
Debt to Equity Ratio-22.641.131.172.531.761.771.840.660.68

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 OPEN LENDING CORP (LPRO) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Open Lending Corp operates in consumer credit through an online lending platform that originates installment-style loans and manages the downstream lifecycle of those loans (including collections and servicing-related activities). The value chain is centered on three steps: (1) borrower acquisition and eligibility screening, (2) underwriting and pricing that align loan terms to expected credit performance, and (3) servicing/collections operations that influence recovery rates and ultimate loss severity. Profitability depends on the discipline of underwriting and the stability of funding costs relative to credit outcomes.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is primarily driven by loan economics rather than subscription-style monetization. The key contributors are:

  • Net interest income from earning the spread between loan yields and the cost of capital used to fund originations.
  • Origination and related fees (where applicable), which are typically tied to volume of new loans and therefore more transactional.
  • Servicing-related income and other recurring fee streams tied to the ongoing performance and administration of originated loans.

The margin drivers are credit losses (expected vs. realized), effective funding costs (including how capital is raised and priced), origination efficiency (marketing and operating expense per funded loan), and the pace of loan prepayments versus loss emergence timing.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Open Lending’s defensible position is best understood as a credit and operational moat rather than classic software switching costs. The most durable advantage typically comes from:

  • Credit culture / underwriting discipline: repeatable modeling, prudent risk appetite, and controls designed to keep loss rates within a target band across borrower segments and economic regimes.
  • Data-driven underwriting and pricing: proprietary or curated performance signals used to assign risk more accurately than less-experienced competitors.
  • Servicing and collections execution: operational focus on recovery rates, loss severity, and borrower management that can stabilize outcomes even when delinquency rises.

Competitive benchmarking (consumer lending / alternative credit):

  • LendingClub — broader alternative lending platform with different funding/structure dynamics and a more diversified product footprint.
  • Upstart — more emphasis on model- and partner-driven underwriting with different credit-model approaches and product mix.
  • OneMain Financial — a brick-and-mortar consumer credit operator with distinct distribution economics and underwriting workflows.

Open Lending’s industry focus emphasizes achieving favorable risk-adjusted returns through online origination and end-to-end loan lifecycle management, where underwriting performance and collections execution can provide an edge versus competitors that rely more heavily on distribution scale or different funding structures. The competitive question is less about brand recognition and more about sustaining risk-adjusted spreads through cycles.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

  • Structural demand for credit access: continued gaps in prime lending and persistent need for installment financing among underserved consumers support long-run market volume for alternative lenders.
  • Digitization of origination and servicing: automation in eligibility, underwriting, and servicing can lower cost per originated loan and improve decisioning speed and consistency.
  • Improving unit economics through scale: as origination volumes rise, fixed platform costs and operational overhead can be leveraged—provided credit performance remains controlled.
  • Refinement of risk models: iterative model updates, better fraud/identity controls, and enhanced collections strategies can improve both loss frequency and loss severity over time.
  • Balance-sheet and funding optimization: the ability to access capital at efficient terms (including warehouse lines and capital-market channels where available) can expand the opportunity set for growth.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Credit-cycle sensitivity: consumer delinquencies and charge-offs can rise faster than underwriting models anticipate, compressing spreads.
  • Funding and liquidity risk: disruption in capital markets or repricing of funding can reduce net interest economics even if origination volume holds.
  • Regulatory and compliance risk: consumer lending is exposed to state-level interest rate and licensing frameworks, CFPB/UDAAP scrutiny, and evolving disclosure and servicing expectations.
  • Model risk and adverse selection: changes in borrower behavior, competitive dynamics, or data availability can degrade underwriting accuracy.
  • Operational execution in collections: deterioration in servicing/collections processes can increase loss severity.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The market typically values consumer lenders and alternative credit platforms using a mix of price-to-book (because earnings power is closely tied to credit quality and tangible equity) and cash-flow-based expectations that reflect sustainable net interest margins and credit loss performance. Sector valuation is usually most sensitive to:

  • Credit quality trajectory (charge-offs, delinquency trends, and loss severity outcomes).
  • Net interest spread sustainability (loan yields vs. funding costs) and the ability to reprice without harming volume.
  • Operating leverage (cost per loan origination and servicing efficiency).
  • Capital adequacy (equity levels and loss absorption capacity).

In this sector, valuation “moves” when investors gain confidence that underwriting and funding economics remain resilient across credit regimes.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Open Lending’s long-term investment case rests on sustaining a credit-and-execution moat: disciplined underwriting, credible pricing discipline, and effective servicing/collections that protect risk-adjusted returns. With consumer credit demand supported by structural gaps in traditional lending access, the central question is whether the company can consistently keep credit losses and funding costs aligned with loan economics while scaling operating efficiency.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for LPRO.

gurufocus.com2026-07-30

ANV Completes Acquisition of Open Lending

ANV Group Holdings Ltd. (“ANV”), a global insurance intermediary platform, today announced it has completed its acquisition of Open Lending, a leading provi

businesswire.com2026-07-30

ANV Completes Acquisition of Open Lending

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--ANV Group Holdings Ltd. (“ANV”), a global insurance intermediary platform, today announced it has completed its acquisition of Open Lending, a leading provider of insurance-backed lending enablement and risk analytics solutions for financial institutions. The transaction, originally announced on June 16, 2026, has received all required regulatory approvals. Open Lending is now a privately held company. Founded more than two decades ago, Open Lending partners with fina.

businesswire.com2026-07-28

Open Lending and ANV Announce Results of Tender Offer

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Open Lending Corporation (NASDAQ: LPRO) (“Open Lending”) and ANV Group Holdings Ltd. (“ANV”), a global insurance intermediary platform, today announced the results of ANV's tender offer for any and all of the outstanding shares of Open Lending common stock (the “Shares”) at a price of $3.15 per Share. Equiniti Trust Company, LLC, the depositary and paying agent for the tender offer, has reported that, as of the expiration of the tender offer at one minute after 11:59.

gurufocus.com2026-07-13

Open Lending Investor Alert: Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC Investigates Adequacy of Price and Process in Proposed Sale of Open Lending Corporation - LPRO

Former Attorney General of Louisiana Charles C. Foti, Jr., Esq. and the law firm of [url="]Kahn Swick and Foti[/url], LLC (“KSF”) are investigating the propo

businesswire.com2026-07-13

Open Lending Investor Alert: Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC Investigates Adequacy of Price and Process in Proposed Sale of Open Lending Corporation - LPRO

NEW YORK & NEW ORLEANS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Former Attorney General of Louisiana Charles C. Foti, Jr., Esq. and the law firm of Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC (“KSF”) are investigating the proposed sale of Open Lending Corporation (NasdaqGM: LPRO) to ANV Group Holdings Ltd. Under the terms of the proposed transaction, shareholders of Open Lending will receive $3.15 in cash for each share of Open Lending that they own. KSF is seeking to determine whether this consideration and the process that led to i.

gurufocus.com2026-07-06

Are AVB, LPRO, APGE, TMHC Obtaining Fair Deals for their Shareholders?

Are AVB, LPRO, APGE, TMHC Obtaining Fair Deals for their Shareholders? PR Newswire NEW YORK, July 6, 2026

prnewswire.com2026-07-06

Are AVB, LPRO, APGE, TMHC Obtaining Fair Deals for their Shareholders?

/PRNewswire/ -- Halper Sadeh LLC, an investor rights law firm, is investigating the following companies for potential violations of the federal securities laws

globenewswire.com2026-06-30

Halper Sadeh LLC is Investigating Whether LPRO, EQR, LEG, MDV are Obtaining Fair Deals for their Shareholders

Insiders may stand to receive substantial financial benefits not available to ordinary shareholders. The proposed transactions may contain terms that could limit superior competing offers. Shareholders are encouraged to contact the firm to discuss their rights and options at no cost or obligation.

globenewswire.com2026-06-19

BRODSKY & SMITH SHAREHOLDER UPDATE: Notifying Investors of the Following Investigations: AstroNova, Inc. (Nasdaq – ALOT), Open Lending Corporation (Nasdaq – LPRO), Huntsman Corporation (NYSE – HUN), Standard BioTools Inc. (Nasdaq – LAB)

BALA CYNWYD, Pa. , June 19, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Brodsky and Smith reminds investors of the following investigations. If you own shares and wish to discuss the investigation, contact Jason Brodsky (jbrodsky@brodskysmith. com) or Marc Ackerman (mackerman@brodskysmith. com) at 855-576-4847.

gurufocus.com2026-06-18

Open Lending Investor Alert: Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC Investigates Adequacy of Price and Process in Proposed Sale of Open Lending Corporation - LPRO

Former Attorney General of Louisiana Charles C. Foti, Jr., Esq. and the law firm of [url="]Kahn Swick and Foti[/url], LLC (“KSF”) are investigating the propo

businesswire.com2026-06-18

Open Lending Investor Alert: Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC Investigates Adequacy of Price and Process in Proposed Sale of Open Lending Corporation - LPRO

NEW YORK CITY & NEW ORLEANS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Former Attorney General of Louisiana Charles C. Foti, Jr., Esq. and the law firm of Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC (“KSF”) are investigating the proposed sale of Open Lending Corporation (NasdaqGM: LPRO) to ANV Group Holdings Ltd. Under the terms of the proposed transaction, shareholders of Open Lending will receive $3.15 in cash for each share of Open Lending that they own. KSF is seeking to determine whether this consideration and the process that led.

globenewswire.com2026-06-17

LPRO Alert: Monsey Firm of Wohl & Fruchter Investigating Fairness of the Proposed Sale of Open Lending Corporation to ANV Group Holdings

MONSEY, N.Y., June 17, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The law firm of Wohl & Fruchter LLP is investigating the fairness of the proposed sale of Open Lending Corporation (Nasdaq: LPRO) (“LPRO”) for $3.15 per share in cash to ANV Group Holdings.

gurufocus.com2026-06-16

$HAREHOLDER ALERT: The M&A Class Action Firm Announces An Investigation of Open Lending Corporation (NASDAQ: LPRO)

$HAREHOLDER ALERT: The M&A Class Action Firm Announces An Investigation of Open Lending Corporation (NASDAQ: LPRO) PR Newswire

prnewswire.com2026-06-16

$HAREHOLDER ALERT: The M&A Class Action Firm Announces An Investigation of Open Lending Corporation (NASDAQ: LPRO)

NEW YORK, June 16, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Class Action Attorney  Juan Monteverde with Monteverde & Associates PC (the "M&A Class Action Firm"), has recovered millions of dollars for shareholders and is recognized as a Top 50 Firm in the 2025 ISS Securities Class Action Services Report. The firm is headquartered at the Empire State Building in New York City and is investigating Open Lending Corporation (NASDAQ: LPRO ) related to its sale to ANV Group Holdings Ltd.

prnewswire.com2026-06-16

Shareholder Alert: Ademi LLP investigates whether Open Lending Corporation is obtaining a Fair Price for Public Shareholders

MILWAUKEE, June 16, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Ademi LLP is investigating Open Lending (NASDAQ: LPRO) for possible breaches of fiduciary duty and other violations of law in its recently announced transaction with ANV Group Holdings. Click here to learn how to join our investigation and obtain additional information or contact us at [email protected] or toll-free: 866-264-3995.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"LPRO reported Q1’26 revenue of $20.49m and net loss of -$0.46m (EPS -$0.0039). On a year-over-year basis, revenue declined from $24.39m in Q1’25 to $20.49m (YoY: -16.0%) and net income deteriorated from +$0.62m to -$0.46m (YoY: -174.6%). Sequentially, revenue rose from $19.35m in Q4’25 (QoQ: +6.0%), but profitability worsened: net income fell from +$1.68m in Q4’25 to -$0.46m (QoQ: -127.4%). Profitability remains volatile. Gross margin improved to 76.3% in Q1’26 (up from 69.5% in Q4’25 and slightly below 75.1% in Q1’25), but operating expenses surged QoQ, driving operating income to -$0.63m (vs +$0.76m in Q4’25). Net margin contracted sharply to -2.2%. Cash flow quality weakened materially: operating cash flow was -$0.76m and free cash flow was -$0.76m in Q1’26 (vs +$5.45m OCF and +$4.67m FCF in Q4’25). The balance sheet is highly liquid (cash & short-term investments $173.3m), with leverage contained (total equity $75.3m) and net debt remaining negative (-$163.7m), implying surplus liquidity. Shareholder returns look strong on price momentum: the stock is up +101.1% over 1 year (no dividends reported and no buybacks shown in this quarter), indicating positive total return primarily via capital appreciation."

Revenue Growth

Caution

Q1’26 revenue $20.49m was down -16.0% YoY (from $24.39m in Q1’25) but up +6.0% QoQ (from $19.35m in Q4’25), showing a rebound that hasn’t translated to sustained growth.

Profitability

Neutral

Operating income swung to -$0.63m in Q1’26 from +$0.76m in Q4’25 (QoQ deterioration). Net margin turned to -2.2% vs +8.7% in Q4’25; YoY net income fell from +$0.62m to -$0.46m.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Q1’26 operating cash flow was -$0.76m and free cash flow -$0.76m, reversing Q4’25 strength (+$5.45m OCF, +$4.67m FCF). No dividends were paid and no buybacks were reported in the quarter.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Positive

Liquidity is strong with cash & equivalents of $173.3m. Equity was stable ($75.3m vs $74.9m in Q4’25) and net debt remains negative (-$163.7m), indicating resilience despite earnings volatility.

Shareholder Returns

Good

Capital appreciation is very strong: +101.1% 1-year change. With no dividends reported and no buybacks in Q1’26, total shareholder return appears driven mainly by price momentum.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Caution

Valuation context is mixed: price is $1.71 with a consensus price target of $4 (implying significant upside potential), but profitability is currently negative and earnings volatility is high.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

Management’s tone is confident that the Q4 CERT shortfall was a reversible execution/risk-pricing problem: they tested rate changes, saw conversion obstacles, and rolled back a subset by the week of Jan 16—since then CERTs per business day rebounded to 353 from 293 during the impacted period, with applications up ~20% YoY. They frame 2026 as sequentially compounding growth (3Q/4Q loaded), supported by Apex One Auto routing, OEM 3 state ramp, and improved retention/profitability dashboards. However, the Q&A reveals the bridge from “down mid-20%” CERTs in Q1 YoY to “up high single digits” full-year relies heavily on (1) eliminating the prior quarter’s headwind, (2) solving profitability for credit builders (said to impact more of Q2), and (3) timing OEM 3 ramp into large states. The market pressure is essentially: can CERT growth return without breaking underwriting. Management’s answer is “test-measure-refine + modeling (Red Rocks) + discipline,” not a new demand tailwind story.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Apex One Auto launched in Q4 2025; initially with 2 prime auto customers and subscription-based minimum volume model
  • Apex One Auto routing: declines in prime funnel are routed into core LPP, increasing application flow
  • OEM 3 ramp-up: deployment in Southern California and Texas; expected contribution to 2026 channel mix and book quality
  • Ramped lender profitability dashboards improving customer engagement and same-customer application flow
  • Project Red Rocks (real-time simulation engine) progressing on time/on budget to prevent future rate-volume headwinds

Business Development

  • Two customers in the prime credit auto segment for Apex One Auto at launch (named customers not provided)
  • OEM 3 rollout with dealer partners (named partners not provided); largest states to launch around end of Q1 / start of Q2 (exact states not provided)
  • Credit union channel: lost zero customers in Q4; added 6 new logos in Q4 (named customers not provided)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Q4 CERTs: 19,308 vs 26,065 in 2024 (certified loan shortfall vs guidance from conversion-rate headwind)
  • Q4 revenue: $19.3M vs negative $56.9M prior-year period; Q4 program fee revenue $10.9M, profit share revenue $6.2M, other/claims admin $2.3M
  • Q4 profit share booking: $6.2M ($322 per certified loan) vs $8.2M ($314 per certified loan) in 2024
  • Implied loss ratio at booking: ~72.5% for 2025 vintage; expected to perform closer to mid-60% target loss ratio
  • Adjusted EBITDA: $2.8M in Q4 vs -$75.9M in 2024; full-year adjusted EBITDA $15.6M
  • Full-year: 97,348 certified loans and $93.2M total revenue
  • Full-year certified loan guidance: 100,000 to 110,000 for 2026 (midpoint implies ~8% increase vs 2025 results)
  • Q1 2026 CERT guidance: 21,000 to 22,000
  • 2026 adjusted EBITDA guidance: $25M to $29M

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Paid down ~$50M of senior secured term loan in Q4 2025
  • Estimated quarterly interest expense savings: ~$575,000 (based on forward interest rate curves)
  • Repurchased ~564,000 shares for ~$900,000 in Q4; remaining authorization ~$20.1M expiring May 2026
  • Balance sheet (Q4 exit): total assets $230.7M; unrestricted cash $176.6M; total liabilities $161.7M; outstanding debt $84.8M

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Conversion-rate and pipeline disruption: certain rate increases created obstacles to certified loan pipeline; company rolled back subset of changes in phases, completed by week of Jan 16
  • Post-rollback momentum: averaged 353 CERTs per business day since Feb 1 vs 293 CERTs during impacted period; 353 consistent with prior 60-day pre-change level
  • Application flow: ~20% up year over year through February
  • Credit builders: previously virtually eliminated super-thin files (11% of quarterly certifications at one point; underwrite none today); super-thins eliminated following 2024 underwriting guideline changes
  • Credit builders mitigation: initial approach included ~100% insurance premium rate increase; company claims credit builders now ~30% of applications and a solution has been found to price profitably (monitoring ongoing)
  • Automation/control initiative: Project Red Rocks to simulate impacts of rate/credit-box changes on volume, loss ratio, and profitability before implementation

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • 2026 CERTs: 100,000 to 110,000 (full year)
  • 2026 Q1 CERTs: 21,000 to 22,000
  • 2026 adjusted EBITDA: $25M to $29M
  • CERT growth cadence expectation: growth compounding quarter over quarter in 2026; third and fourth quarter loaded
  • OEM 3 ramp timing: two largest states launching end of Q1 / beginning of Q2 (per Q&A); CERT jump cited as 76% in Q4 vs Q3

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Q4 operating headwind: temporary conversion rate headwind tied to pricing adjustments (rate increases) that negatively impacted certified loan pipeline; rolled back completed by mid-January
  • Q1 pressure implied by prior year base composition: Q1 2025 included higher credit builder and super-thin volumes (super-thins eliminated in 2025; credit builders significantly reduced via ~100% rate increase and tighter credit stance)
  • Credit builders as an operational constraint: initially reduced/controlled via underwriting/pricing; need to ensure they can be priced without adverse selection (company says solution impacts more of Q2)
  • Book quality risk management: maintaining implied booking loss ratio at ~72.5% (vs mid-60% target) to reduce change-in-estimate volatility; requires underwriting discipline to avoid future elevated defaults/rising delinquencies/adverse loss ratios

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the LPRO Q4 2025 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for LPRO.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
No recent 10-K available.
No recent 10-Q available.
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (LPRO)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Open Lending Corporation (LPRO) Financial Profile