Civista Bancshares, Inc.

Civista Bancshares, Inc. (CIVB) Market Cap

Civista Bancshares, Inc. has a market capitalization of $548.9M.

Price: $26.41

0.33 (1.27%)

Market Cap: 548.89M

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: Dennis G. Shaffer

Sector: Financial Services

Industry: Banks - Regional

IPO Date: 1994-04-06

Website: https://www.civb.com

Civista Bancshares, Inc. (CIVB) - Company Information

Market Cap: 548.89M|Sector: Financial Services

Company Profile

Civista Bancshares, Inc. operates as the financial holding company for Civista Bank that provides community banking services. It collects a range of customer deposits; and offers commercial and agriculture, commercial and residential real estate, farm real estate, real estate construction, consumer, and other loans, as well as letters of credit. The company also purchases securities; and provides trust and third-party insurance services. It operates approximately 42 locations in Northern, Central, Southwestern, and Northwestern Ohio, as well as Southeastern Indiana and Northern Kentucky. The company was formerly known as First Citizens Banc Corp and changed its name to Civista Bancshares, Inc. in May 2015. Civista Bancshares, Inc. was founded in 1884 and is headquartered in Sandusky, Ohio.

Analyst Sentiment

69%
Buy

From 6 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $27.00

▲ +2.2% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$27

Median

$27

High Bound

$27

Average

$27

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$27.00
▲ +2.23% Upside
Low Target
$27.00
2% Risk
Median Target
$27.00
2% Mid
High Target
$27.00
2% Max
Consensus
Buy
5 / 8 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)549472449337358301324275225
Enterprise Value ($M)676599654616828682710597781
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)10.727.879.146.618.127.418.198.207.96
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)3.202.534.263.801.67
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)2.228.466.835.295.764.945.264.443.72
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)0.990.850.830.680.890.760.830.700.60
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)10.8940.2047.7718.3232.9687.3217.4821.4318.44
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)10.749.979.6513.3111.1711.539.6712.91
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)12.9569.8544.3639.3462.5355.5462.4260.2492.44
Debt to Equity Ratio2.440.380.520.691.351.191.161.011.64

CIVB Growth Runway Model

Standard long term linear growth fade

Multi-Stage Discounted Cash Flow Sandbox

Market Price$26.41
Intrinsic Value$26.38
Market Alignment
Overvalued by 0.1%relative to calculated intrinsic value
9.00%
Exp: 18%18%
i

Growth runway slowdown

This value provides a time window for the growth rate to decline beyond Stage 1 toward the terminal rate. Longer windows are most useful for companies with high growth starting conditions or strong competitive advantages. This option stretches out the growth rate slowdown across 5, 10, or 15-year steps. A high-growth starting condition (exceeding a 25% initial growth rate) automatically applies a curve decay to simulate realistic, rapid market saturation.
i

Terminal growth rate

With long-term inflation between 3-5%, revenue must grow by that baseline to maintain flat real-world market share. This value sets the permanent terminal growth rate to factor into the valuation beyond the growth slowdown runway toward maturity.

3-Stage Financial Runway Horizon

🧠 Perpetuity Horizon Engine (Stage 3: Post-2035)

Terminal FCF Base$0.17B
Perpetuity TV Value$3.13B
Discounted TV (PV)$1.32B
TV Weighting %66.7%
⚠️
Financial Model Disclaimer & Risk Disclosure: This interactive scenario simulator is an educational sandbox provided strictly for informational and analytical research purposes. Core historical financial statements and consensus estimates are sourced directly via Financial Modeling Prep (FMP). All downstream outputs are entirely deterministic, hypothetical projections generated by combining automated mathematical formulas (including linear interpolation and Gaussian bell-curve decay models) with user-selected variables and third-party financial data inputs. Users assume all liability for trading decisions executed based on these sandbox calculations.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 CIVISTA BANCSHARES INC (CIVB) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Civista Bancshares operates as a community/regional bank franchise. The value chain is straightforward: (1) attract and retain deposits from households and businesses, (2) allocate that funding into interest-earning assets—primarily loans and investment securities, and (3) manage credit performance, liquidity, and interest-rate sensitivity to produce earnings. Fee businesses (e.g., service charges, mortgage/loan fees, and wealth or payment-related services where applicable) provide incremental non-interest income.

Because deposits are “sticky” when customer relationships are embedded locally (branch presence, relationship banking, and established account history), the business model tends to compound: strong customer retention supports stable funding, which can lower funding costs and improve risk-adjusted returns on assets.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

The core earning engine is Net Interest Income (NII), generated by the spread between interest earned on loans and securities and interest paid on deposits and borrowings. For regional banks, NII is the dominant profit driver and is influenced by:

  • Deposit cost discipline (ability to maintain a low-cost deposit mix),
  • Loan yield and mix (including commercial, consumer, and real-estate-related exposures),
  • Investment portfolio structure (duration/credit characteristics), and
  • Interest-rate and liquidity management (asset-liability positioning).

Non-interest income typically includes service charges, card and deposit-related fees, loan-related fees, and other banking services. Monetisation is generally more “recurring” when it is tied to everyday account activity and recurring client relationships, while more “transactional” items include loan origination and certain one-time fee events.

The margin profile also depends on expense efficiency. In community banking, disciplined operating expenses—often measured via an efficiency ratio—frequently determines whether revenue translates into sustainable profitability across cycles.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Civista’s moat is primarily rooted in financial intermediation advantages rather than product differentiation. The most durable advantages typically include:

  • Cost of deposits / funding advantage (Regulatory + Relationship Moat): Relationship banking and local customer depth can support a favorable deposit mix, reducing the cost of funds and supporting NII resilience.
  • Credit culture and underwriting discipline: Consistent loss expectations, diversified credit selection, and conservative underwriting can reduce downturn severity and protect capital—an intangible but highly operational advantage.
  • Switching costs: For commercial and retail customers, changing banking providers can be operationally costly (payment rails, direct deposit arrangements, credit lines, and service relationships). This tends to protect deposit bases and loan renewals.
  • Regulatory operating moat: Banking requires ongoing compliance, capital management, and risk governance. This raises barriers to entry and limits the ease with which competitors can scale a comparable franchise.

Competitive benchmarking: Civista competes against larger regional and multi-state banks such as Huntington Bancshares (HBAN), Old National Bancorp (ONB), and Wintrust Financial (WTFC). Those peers often emphasize broader geographic footprints, scale, and more diversified revenue pools. Civista’s positioning is comparatively more focused on community/regional banking dynamics—where local deposit gathering, relationship underwriting, and credit execution can translate into competitive returns when managed prudently.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, the durable growth levers for a bank like Civista are less about one-off expansion and more about compounding franchise economics:

  • Balance-sheet compounding: Retaining and reinvesting earnings to grow loans and securities while maintaining capital and credit discipline.
  • Relationship-driven deposit growth: Deposits that are acquired and retained through durable customer relationships tend to lower marginal funding costs over time.
  • Credit-cycle management: Banks with consistent underwriting can gain market share during stress periods—either through selective origination or through competitors’ tightening.
  • Credit quality + earnings power normalization: Lower volatility of credit losses and stable efficiency supports the ability to sustain profitability across rate and economic regimes.
  • Moderate diversification of fee income: Expanding service and banking-adjacent revenue streams can reduce dependence on interest-rate spreads.

The total addressable market is tied to household and business banking demand in the bank’s operating geography—particularly commercial lending, consumer credit tied to local employment, and deposit services. The main challenge is not market size, but maintaining a high-quality underwriting and funding model relative to peers.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Credit risk and concentration: Commercial and real-estate-related exposures can create earnings volatility. Monitoring loss trends, watch-list migration, and underwriting standards is essential.
  • Interest-rate risk: Changes in funding costs and asset yields can compress spreads. The sensitivity of net interest income to rate movements and balance-sheet duration matters.
  • Liquidity and funding pressure: Unfavorable deposit pricing or volatility in deposit flows can increase funding costs and reduce earnings power.
  • Regulatory and capital constraints: Banking regulations, capital requirements, and compliance costs can limit growth and affect profitability.
  • Operational and technology risk: Cybersecurity, core-system reliability, model risk, and vendor dependence can impair service and raise costs.
  • Competitive dynamics: Larger banks and non-bank lenders may compete for specific segments (e.g., lending products), pressuring yields or deposit pricing.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Equity analysts typically value banks using a mix of metrics rather than a single multiple:

  • Price-to-Tangible Book (P/TBV): Reflects the market’s view of the franchise’s earning power relative to tangible capital.
  • Price-to-Earnings and forward profitability measures: Gauges sustainability of earnings through the cycle.
  • Return metrics (ROE/ROA) and efficiency: Markets often reward consistent efficiency and credible capital generation.
  • Credit quality indicators: The market capitalizes forward expectations of credit losses and normal earnings power.
  • NII drivers: Deposit cost trends, asset mix, and interest-rate sensitivity influence valuation sentiment.

Key valuation “needle movers” are durable: capital strength, credit performance through cycles, efficiency improvements, and evidence that deposit franchise advantages translate into stable risk-adjusted returns.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Civista Bancshares is best understood as a franchise where profitability depends on deposit economics, disciplined credit culture, and efficient operations. The primary moat is not product novelty; it is the combination of relationship-driven switching costs, a funding-cost advantage, and regulatory/compliance barriers that make scaling a comparable franchise difficult for new entrants. For long-term investors, the thesis centers on whether Civista can sustain risk-adjusted returns while preserving capital through credit and rate cycles.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for CIVB.

zacks.com2026-06-03

Civista Bancshares (CIVB) Could Be a Great Choice

Dividends are one of the best benefits to being a shareholder, but finding a great dividend stock is no easy task. Does Civista Bancshares (CIVB) have what it takes?

zacks.com2026-06-01

New Strong Buy Stocks for June 1st

PGY, TTMI, GDOT, OXY and CIVB have been added to the Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) List on June 1st, 2026.

zacks.com2026-06-01

Best Income Stocks to Buy for June 1st

CAPL, CIVB and OXY made it to the Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) income stocks list on June 1st, 2026.

zacks.com2026-05-20

Best Income Stocks to Buy for May 20th

MNR, KSS and CIVB made it to the Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) income stocks list on May 20, 2026.

zacks.com2026-05-14

New Strong Buy Stocks for May 14th

TPR, CIVB, LCUT, NXST and GECC have been added to the Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) List on May 14th, 2026.

zacks.com2026-05-14

Best Income Stocks to Buy for May 14th

GECC, NXST and CIVB made it to the Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) income stocks list on May 14th, 2026.

zacks.com2026-05-11

New Strong Buy Stocks for May 11th

TNET, LSCC, STRL, CIVB and KVUE have been added to the Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) List on May 11th, 2026.

zacks.com2026-05-11

Best Income Stocks to Buy for May 11th

KVUE, BP and CIVB made it to the Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) income stocks list on May 11th, 2026.

zacks.com2026-05-01

Why Civista Bancshares (CIVB) is a Great Dividend Stock Right Now

Dividends are one of the best benefits to being a shareholder, but finding a great dividend stock is no easy task. Does Civista Bancshares (CIVB) have what it takes?

zacks.com2026-04-27

Best Income Stocks to Buy for April 27th

DOW, CTBI and CIVB made it to the Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) income stocks list on April 27th, 2026.

seekingalpha.com2026-04-22

Civista Bancshares, Inc. (CIVB) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Civista Bancshares, Inc. (CIVB) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

zacks.com2026-04-22

Civista Bancshares (CIVB) Reports Q1 Earnings: What Key Metrics Have to Say

While the top- and bottom-line numbers for Civista Bancshares (CIVB) give a sense of how the business performed in the quarter ended March 2026, it could be worth looking at how some of its key metrics compare to Wall Street estimates and year-ago values.

zacks.com2026-04-22

Civista Bancshares (CIVB) Beats Q1 Earnings and Revenue Estimates

Civista Bancshares (CIVB) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.74 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.56 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.66 per share a year ago.

prnewswire.com2026-04-22

Civista Bancshares, Inc. Announces First-Quarter 2026 Financial Results of $0.72 per Common Share, up $0.06 per Common Share from First-Quarter 2025

SANDUSKY, Ohio, April 22, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Civista Bancshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:CIVB) ("Civista") today reported net income of $15.0 million, or $0.72 per common share, for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. The results of the periods reflect the inclusion of The Farmers Savings Bank ("FSB") merger since November 7, 2025.

prnewswire.com2026-04-21

CIVISTA BANCSHARES, INC. ANNOUNCES SECOND QUARTER COMMON DIVIDEND

SANDUSKY, Ohio, April 21, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Civista Bancshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:CIVB) ("Civista") announces that the Board of Directors has approved and declared a quarterly dividend of 18 cents per common share, consistent with the prior quarter, to shareholders of record as of May 5, 2026, payable on May 19, 2026.  This dividend represents a payout of approximately $3.7 million.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"CIVB reported 2026-03-31 revenue of $55.8M and net income of $15.0M (EPS $0.72). YoY, revenue declined (−8.6% vs 2025-03-31) while net income rose sharply (+47.4%). QoQ, revenue fell (−14.9% vs 2025-12-31) but net income increased (+22.2%), indicating material profitability improvement despite a softer top line. Net margin expanded to ~26.9% (from ~18.7% QoQ and ~16.7% YoY), suggesting better cost discipline and/or improved earning mix. As a banking company, balance sheet resilience is key: total assets were $4.30B, roughly flat QoQ (−0.9%) and below the prior-year level (vs $4.15B at 2025-03-31, ~+3.6%). Equity strengthened to $552.2M, up QoQ (+1.6%) and meaningfully higher than a year ago. Net debt moved to net-cash/negative territory (−$83.5M) from net debt of $206.9M at 2025-12-31. Shareholder returns look solid: the stock is up +26.22% over 1 year, and the dividend yield is ~0.79% (payout ratio ~25%). Total return should be driven mainly by price appreciation; analyst consensus targets $24 versus a ~$24.6 price (near-term valuation roughly in-line)."

Revenue Growth

Fair

Revenue declined both QoQ (−14.9% from $65.6M to $55.8M) and YoY (−8.6% from $61.0M to $55.8M), indicating a softer operating environment despite recent profitability gains.

Profitability

Strong

Net income grew QoQ (+22.2%) and YoY (+47.4%). Net margin expanded to ~26.9% from ~18.7% QoQ and ~16.7% YoY, signaling strong profitability momentum.

Cash Flow Quality

Positive

Net income improved meaningfully while the dividend payout ratio remained moderate (~25%). No cash-flow statement data provided, so cash-flow quality is inferred from earnings performance rather than direct operating cash trends.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Good

Total assets were stable QoQ (−0.9%) with equity strengthening QoQ (+1.6%). Net debt improved to negative (−$83.5M) from positive net debt in prior quarters, supporting balance sheet resilience.

Shareholder Returns

Strong

1-year price momentum is strong (+26.22%), well above the >20% threshold. Dividend yield is ~0.79% with a ~25% payout ratio, implying a healthy but not dominant yield contribution.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

Consensus target is $24 versus current ~$24.6 (roughly flat to slightly below), while valuation is inexpensive on reported P/E (~7.9). Upside appears more dependent on execution than on multiple expansion.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

Civista’s Q1 2026 print showed strong core earnings momentum driven by margin expansion and improved funding costs. Net income rose to $15.0M and EPS to $0.72, while pre-provision net revenue increased 29% YoY. The key datapoint was NIM expanding 16 bps to 3.85%, supported by a brokered-CD rollover: $125M CDs maturing at 4.23% were replaced with $100M at 3.87%, saving 36 bps and reducing brokered reliance for the sixth consecutive quarter. Management also completed the Farmers Savings Bank core conversion, with acquisition-related one-time expenses largely concluding (~$0.02/share). In operations, efficiency improved to 60.1%, helped by accrual normalization and controlled expenses despite higher FTEs from the Farmers deal. Outlook is constructive but not risk-free: management expects mid-single-digit loan/deposit growth, but noted significant Q1 payoffs and a competitive deposit market with “4 handles” offers nearby. NIM guidance implies stability without more Fed cuts.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Loan production strength: $214 million new loan production in Q1 2026, offset by $83 million early payoffs; management expects mid-single-digit loan growth for 2026
  • Pipeline expansion: pipeline is 2x the size of the prior-year pipeline (at the same point in time)
  • Lower brokered funding dependency supports NIM: reduced brokered deposits for the sixth consecutive quarter and achieved NIM expansion
  • Loan repricing flow-through: management cited repricing of loans from the 4.75% range into the 6s during 2026

Business Development

  • Farmers Savings Bank acquisition (core system conversion completed in Q1 2026; acquisition-related expenses expected to be largely last in the quarter)
  • Ohio market disruption and competitive environment leveraged for deposit and talent adds; referenced talent inflows from institutions engaged in M&A in Ohio
  • Talent/source references: WesBanco/Premier (largest talent pipeline mentioned) and Westfield deal (treasurer hire cited as coming over ~one month prior)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Net income: $15.0M / $0.72 diluted EPS; +47% YoY and +22% linked-quarter
  • Pre-provision net revenue: +$3.8M (+29%) YoY and +$3.2M (+3.8%) linked-quarter
  • NIM expanded +16 bps to 3.85% in Q1 2026
  • Earning asset yield increased +5 bps sequentially to 5.66%
  • Cost of funds: 1.96% (down 35 bps YoY; down 12 bps sequentially)
  • Cost of deposits: 1.81% (down 19 bps YoY; down 11 bps sequentially)
  • Brokered CD mechanics: $125M of brokered CDs matured late Dec at 4.23% WAVG; replaced with $100M brokered CDs at 3.87% WAVG, saving 36 bps and reducing amount
  • Efficiency ratio improved to 60.1% vs 64.9% prior-year Q1
  • Effective tax rate: 16.8% for the quarter
  • Noninterest income: -$0.453M (-4.6%) linked-quarter; +$1.6M (+20%) YoY (drivers: card fees -$0.336M linked-quarter; service charges +$0.190M YoY; net gains on loan/lease sales +$1.0M; insurance subsidiary reserve release of $444k related to claims that never materialized)
  • Noninterest expense: -$1.1M (-3.6%) linked-quarter; +$2.7M (+10%) YoY (drivers: Q4 commission accrual adjustment; YoY comp expense +$2.2M from salary/commission/medical and higher FTEs)

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Quarterly dividend: $0.18/share (annualized yield 3.16%; payout ratio 25%)
  • Stock repurchase: renewed/authorized up to $25M outstanding common shares; no repurchases in prior several quarters per management
  • Core deposit funding: increased organically by >$60M in Q1; reduced brokered deposits by $25M; core deposits up 8% for the quarter (after backing out brokered)
  • Deposits: total deposits +$35.4M annualized growth rate 4% (Q1 2026); loan-to-deposit ratio 92%
  • Liquidity: securities portfolio $682M (16% of balance sheet); with cash, totals 22% of deposits; securities had ~$49M (~7%) unrealized losses

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Core system conversion for Farmers Savings Bank completed; acquisition-related one-time expenses impacted net income by ~$400k or $0.02/share (management indicated these were likely the last expenses associated with acquisition)
  • Accrual discipline: adjusted all accruals at least quarterly after a commission accrual adjustment benefit realized (actual commission expense $1.4M lower than accrued; adjustment in Q4 2025)
  • Expense run-rate expectations: nonrecurring-excluded expenses were $29.4M for Q1; Q2 expected $29.5M-$30.0M; Q3/Q4 potentially $30.0M-$30.7M (merit increases took effect April 1 per management)
  • Digital onboarding: online account opening enabled via digital apps; management attributes some deposit growth to making it easier to do business plus marketplace disruption

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Loan growth: expects mid-single-digit loan and deposit growth for 2026
  • Loan pipeline: pipeline today is 2x last year’s pipeline at same point
  • NIM guidance (no further Fed rate cuts planned): Q2 expected flat to slightly up (+1 to +2 bps); NIM to move into mid-to-upper 3.80s and level in high 3.80s in Q3 and beyond
  • Impact of rates: if rate cut, NIM 1 to 2 bps lower; if rate increase at end of year, NIM 1 to 2 bps higher
  • Expense outlook: Q2 $29.5M-$30.0M; Q3/Q4 up to $30.7M
  • Noninterest income seasonality/gain on sale: Q2 expected between $9.1M-$9.5M; Q3 increase of ~$0.25M due to gain-on-sale seasonality (per analyst Q&A)

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Payoffs/headwinds: payoffs were significant in Q1 (e.g., $83M payoffs offset $214M production), requiring pipeline conversion to sustain growth
  • Deposit competition: competition described as intense across major metro markets; Columbus most pressured with rates, and management cited banks offering '4 handles' while Civista in high 3s
  • Brokered CD repricing risk: additional brokered CD maturities/repricing in near term (approx $125M maturing later in Q1 outside April at ~3.80% range; some in September)
  • Securities mark-to-market: $49M (~7%) unrealized losses on available-for-sale portfolio
  • Macro uncertainty risk acknowledged, though management stated Ohio/SE Indiana showed no deterioration and credit quality remains strong

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Loan growth confidence vs payoffs: Management said Q1 payoffs were being watched closely and noted a couple of other large loans expected for Q2. They emphasized a pipeline now twice last year’s size, plus undrawn construction funds $14M higher than year-end, supporting mid-single-digit growth after conversion.
  • NIM trajectory under stable/no-cut Fed: Management guided Q2 NIM flat to +1-2 bps, then mid-to-upper 3.80s and leveling in the high 3.80s in Q3 and beyond if no rate cuts are planned. They also quantified loan repricing volumes and stated cuts reduce NIM by 1-2 bps, increases add 1-2 bps.
  • Deposit competition and cost-of-funds actions: Management described competition as intense across most major metro markets, with Columbus seeing more rate pressure; they cited being priced in the high 3s vs '4 handles.' They stated brokered CD renewal rates should be stable if rates stay flat, with limited remaining wiggle room on non-maturities.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the CIVB Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for CIVB.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (CIVB)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Civista Bancshares, Inc. (CIVB) Financial Profile