CVR Energy, Inc.

CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI) Market Cap

CVR Energy, Inc. has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Dane J. Neumann

Sector: Energy

Industry: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing

IPO Date: 2007-10-23

Website: https://www.cvrenergy.com

CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Energy

Company Profile

CVR Energy, Inc., a diversified company, operates through its subsidiaries primarily focusing on petroleum refining and the production of nitrogen fertilizers within the United States. Its business is organized into two distinct divisions: Petroleum and Nitrogen Fertilizer. The Petroleum segment is responsible for processing crude oil into marketable products such as gasoline, diesel fuel, and various other refined fuels, which it then distributes. This division manages and operates a sophisticated coking refinery in southeast Kansas, designed to handle medium-sour crude, alongside another crude oil processing facility located in Wynnewood, Oklahoma. Crucial logistical infrastructure also supports these operations. The primary clientele for this segment includes retail outlets, railway companies, agricultural cooperatives, and other refiners or marketers. The Nitrogen Fertilizer division encompasses a North American production facility that utilizes a pet coke gasification process to convert pet coke into nitrogen-based fertilizers. Furthermore, it operates a facility in East Dubuque, Illinois, which specializes in manufacturing nitrogen fertilizers in the form of both ammonia and urea ammonium nitrate (UAN). UAN products are predominantly supplied to the agricultural sector, while ammonia finds application in both farming and diverse industrial settings. Established in 1906, the firm's corporate headquarters are situated in Sugar Land, Texas. CVR Energy, Inc. ultimately functions as a subsidiary of Icahn Enterprises L.P.

Analyst Sentiment

25%
Underperform

From 6 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $31.00

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$28

Median

$30

High Bound

$35

Average

$31

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$31.00
▼ -12.97% Upside
Low Target
$28.00
-21% Risk
Median Target
$30.00
-16% Mid
High Target
$35.00
-2% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

```html

📘 CVR ENERGY INC (CVI) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

CVR Energy Inc is a North American energy infrastructure and refining platform centered on turning crude oil into refined petroleum products. The value chain runs from (1) sourcing crude, (2) processing it in its refineries into transportation fuels and other refined products, and (3) distributing products through integrated logistics (e.g., pipelines, terminals, and related distribution capabilities) that help move volumes efficiently to regional markets. The operating model emphasizes refinery run-rate optimization, product yield management, and logistical execution to capture margins when market spreads reward specific crude/product configurations.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is predominantly generated through the sale of refined products produced from crude oil. Monetisation is largely spread-driven rather than contract-driven: margins depend on the relationship between the cost of crude and the realizable value of refinery outputs (the “crack spread” concept).

  • Refining product sales (primary): Gasoline, distillates, and other petroleum products sold into regional distribution networks.
  • Integration-driven logistics monetisation (supporting): Logistic assets can improve throughput economics by reducing per-unit distribution friction and enabling more consistent delivery to demand centers.

Margin drivers typically include: (1) crude quality/grade flexibility and the ability to access advantaged crude baskets, (2) refinery complexity and operational reliability (yield and availability), and (3) logistical efficiency that reduces basis and transportation drag.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

CVR’s competitive position is rooted more in cost advantages and asset specificity than in customer “stickiness.” Competitors can buy and sell refined products, but they cannot easily replicate refinery capacity configuration, permitting history, and the associated logistics footprint.

Geographic cost advantage / low-cost feedstock access: CVR’s Midwest and inland U.S. refinery footprint supports participation in the North American crude and product system where pricing differentials can favor inland operators that can source appropriate crude grades and route products efficiently to nearby demand. Proximity to crude sourcing basins and regional product demand helps reduce delivered-cost friction versus models that rely heavily on longer haul or less flexible crude sourcing.

Logistical infrastructure: Integrated distribution capability (pipelines/terminals and related infrastructure) can lower the incremental cost of moving volumes and can improve operational optionality during demand or spread shifts.

Complexity and operational execution: Refining economics reward plants that can sustain high utilization, manage turnarounds effectively, and optimize yields for prevailing product pricing. This favors operators with proven operational discipline and configured processing capability.

  • Marathon Petroleum (large-scale refiners with major Gulf Coast exposure): focuses on different regional crude and product flow dynamics; CVR’s inland orientation emphasizes participation in Midwest/inland spreads with different logistical economics.
  • Valero Energy (global North American refining leader with diversified footprints): benefits from system breadth; CVR’s positioning is more concentrated, which can amplify both operating leverage and spread sensitivity.
  • PBF Energy (U.S. refiner with East/West mix): competes through regional asset networks; CVR’s advantage is anchored in inland geographic integration and logistics-driven efficiency.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

  • Regional supply/demand imbalances: Even with long-run demand normalization pressures from electrification, refined product demand remains substantial, and capacity rationalization and compliance-driven retirements can tighten supply in certain regions.
  • Crude slate flexibility and spread capture: Market structures reward refiners that can access advantaged crude grades and adjust yields as crack structures change.
  • Logistics resilience: Transport and distribution assets reduce bottlenecks and can preserve economics when spot market routing becomes less favorable.
  • Regulatory-driven complexity as a barrier: Stricter fuel specifications and emissions requirements can raise effective barriers to entry, making modernized, permitted capacity more valuable.

Over a 5–10 year horizon, CVR’s investment case is less about volume growth in a steady demand curve and more about sustaining competitive unit economics through asset reliability, feedstock access, and infrastructure-enabled distribution—factors that influence the ability to compound value in a cyclical sector.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Refining margin cyclicality: Crack spreads can compress due to global refining capacity additions, demand swings, and crude/product spread shifts.
  • Commodity and feedstock quality risk: Changes in crude availability, price differentials, or crude quality compatible with refinery configuration can impair margin capture.
  • Regulatory and environmental compliance: Compliance with emissions, wastewater, and air permitting requirements can raise sustaining capital needs and operating costs.
  • Energy transition demand pressure: Structural demand erosion from electrification can reduce gasoline/diesel pools over time and alter product mix economics.
  • Capital intensity and execution risk: Turnarounds, maintenance capex, and potential upgrades require disciplined execution; disruptions can affect availability and yields.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The market typically values refiners based on expected operating cash flow power and sensitivity to refining margins, often using enterprise value relative to normalized earnings measures (commonly anchored to EV/EBITDA-style frameworks) rather than growth-rate metrics. Key valuation drivers include:

  • Normalized crack economics: not the level of any single spread, but the ability to maintain attractive unit margins across cycles.
  • Run-rate reliability and utilization: operational execution that sustains margins and limits downtime.
  • Integration quality: how effectively logistics reduce per-unit friction and protect realized prices.
  • Balance sheet durability: leverage and liquidity affect resilience through margin troughs.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

CVR Energy’s long-term appeal is anchored in refinery- and logistics-driven cost competitiveness within North American refining. The moat is primarily structural—geographic positioning for feedstock/product economics, logistical infrastructure that supports efficient distribution, and operational execution that converts complex assets into margin capture. The investment thesis depends on sustaining unit economics through cycles while managing environmental/compliance capital requirements and adapting to evolving fuel demand dynamics.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

```

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-06-30

"CVI reported Q2’26 revenue of $2.738B and net income of $46M (EPS: -$0.03 per the dataset). On a YoY basis, revenue rose from $1.761B in Q2’25 to $2.738B in Q2’26 (+55.4%), and net income improved from a net loss of $114M to profit of $46M (an improvement of ~$160M; dataset margin moved from -6.47% to +1.68%). QoQ, revenue increased from $1.980B in Q1’26 to $2.738B in Q2’26 (+38.3%), while net income swung from a loss of $192M to a gain of $46M. Profitability improved sequentially: operating income rose to $78M from -$326M in Q1, and net margin moved from -9.7% to +1.7%. However, the gross profit in Q2 is negative in the provided figures (gross margin -82%), indicating volatility or classification differences; operating and net profitability still turned positive. Cash flow strengthened materially: operating cash flow was $307M and free cash flow was $264M in Q2’26, up from $64M OCF in Q1’26. Capital allocation is light (no buybacks reported) with $10M dividends paid. Balance sheet resilience: cash rose to $737M from $512M, total assets increased to $4.08B, equity rose to $744M, while debt remained heavy ($1.77B long-term). Shareholder returns are strong with a +63.9% 1-year price change, suggesting positive total return momentum despite fundamentals still showing earnings volatility. Analyst valuation context: consensus price target $31 vs. current ~$29.44 implies modest upside (~5%)."

Revenue Growth

Good

Revenue grew +55.4% YoY (Q2’25 $1.761B to Q2’26 $2.738B) and +38.3% QoQ (Q1’26 $1.980B to Q2’26 $2.738B), indicating strong recent acceleration.

Profitability

Neutral

Net income turned positive to $46M in Q2’26 from -$192M QoQ and from -$114M YoY. Net margin improved to +1.68% from -9.70% (QoQ). Note: provided gross profit is negative with gross margin -82%, so gross-level signals are volatile; operating/net profitability improved nevertheless.

Cash Flow Quality

Good

Operating cash flow increased to $307M (from $64M in Q1’26). Free cash flow was $264M vs. $17M in Q1’26. Dividends are present ($10M) with no buybacks reported.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Fair

Cash rose to $737M and equity improved to $744M, but leverage remains substantial with long-term debt at $1.77B and net debt of ~$1.03B. Total assets increased to $4.08B, supporting resilience but not de-risking.

Shareholder Returns

Good

Strong momentum: +63.9% 1y price change materially boosts the total-return outlook. Dividend yield is low (~0.36%) and buybacks are not shown, so most of the return appears price-driven.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Fair

Consensus target is $31 vs. current ~$29.44 (modest upside). Given earnings volatility and mixed gross-profit signals, sentiment looks cautiously positive rather than strongly undervalued.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

CVI delivered another strong operating quarter driven by tight global refined product supply dynamics, reflected in higher Group 3 2-1-1 cracks (Q2 average $44.91/bbl) and robust throughput (213k bpd) with 98% crude utilization. Adjusted EBITDA reached $209M and adjusted EPS was $0.34, with petroleum EBITDA expanding to $106M from $38M despite meaningful headwinds. The dominant constraint is RIN economics: RIN price rose >125% YoY to nearly $14/bbl, and RIN expense totaled $216M (=$11.16/bbl), reducing the realized capture rate by ~25%. Wynnewood SRE uncertainty (EPA still delinquent; 2025 compliance ~1 month away) adds regulatory overhang even as management reiterated a potential ~9% capture improvement if 100% SRE is received. Derivatives added pressure (realized loss $81M), though the hedged exposure steps down in Q4 and is smaller in 2027. Near-term, management guided higher Q3 product crack metrics and operationally planned East Dubuque turnaround with ~5% ammonia capacity expansion.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Group 3 2-1-1 crack spread strength (Q2 average $44.91/bbl vs $24.02/bbl in Q2 2025) supporting realized margin and capture
  • High throughput and utilization: 98% crude utilization and 99% ammonia utilization; light product yield of 92% on total throughput
  • Fertilizer demand strength: spring nitrogen demand strong; solid book of business for H2 2026 at attractive pricing
  • East Dubuque expansion during planned late-August turnaround expected to increase ammonia capacity by ~5% and enable alternative feedstock use (natural gas vs third-party pet coke)

Business Development

    AI IconFinancial Highlights

    • Reported net income $46M; net loss attributable to CVR Energy stockholders $(3)M; diluted EPS $(0.03); EBITDA $161M
    • Adjusted EBITDA $209M and adjusted EPS $0.34
    • Q2 headwinds/items: unfavorable RFS liability change $(73)M; favorable inventory valuation impacts +$19M; unrealized derivative gains +$6M
    • Petroleum segment adjusted EBITDA $106M vs $38M in Q2 2025 driven by higher throughput volumes and elevated Group 3 crack spreads; partially offset by higher RIN expenses, WTI backwardation, and realized derivative losses
    • Total throughput ~213,000 bpd; crude utilization ~98% of nameplate; light product yield 92%
    • Realized margin (adjusted for RFS liability, inventory valuation, unrealized derivative gains) $12.43/bbl, 28% capture rate on Group 3 2-1-1 benchmark
    • RIN price: up >125% YoY to nearly $14/bbl in Q2 2026; RIN expense excluding RFS liability change $216M or $11.16/bbl negatively impacted capture by ~25%
    • Estimated accrued RFS obligation $408M at June 30; includes $169M RIN mark-to-market at average $2.41; EPA has not ruled on pending 2025 petition (100% Wynnewood RIN obligation recognized)
    • If Wynnewood Refining receives 100% SRE, consolidated capture rate would improve by ~9%
    • Derivative activity: Q2 derivative losses totaling $75M (realized loss $81M; unrealized gain $6M); crack spread swap settlement ~4.4M bbl during Q2; open positions ~8.2M bbl
    • Hedging book: for remainder of 2026, ~4.6M bbl diesel hedged, 400k bbl gasoline hedged (diesel split between Q3/Q4; all gasoline in Q3); notional value of open crack spread swaps for Q3 ~ $102M
    • Ammonia segment adjusted EBITDA $107M vs $67M in Q2 2025; ammonia utilization 99% with minimal downtime
    • Operating cost improvement: petroleum direct operating expenses $5.93/bbl vs $6.45/bbl in Q2 2025 (driven by increased throughput as Coffeyville came out of turnaround in Q2 2025)

    AI IconCapital Funding

    • Capital spending: $43M cash uses in quarter context; total consolidated capital spending (accrual) $46M (Petroleum $29M; Fertilizer $17M)
    • Full-year 2026 consolidated capex estimate: $215M to $240M
    • Cash balance: $737M at quarter end (includes $137M fertilizer cash)
    • Liquidity excluding CVR Partners: ~$1.1B (cash $600M; ABL availability $540M)
    • Deleveraging goal reiterated: gross leverage target ~$1.0B excluding CVR Partners debt
    • Quarter uses: $27M paid for noncontrolling interest portion of CVR Partners Q1 2026 distribution; $20M cash interest; $10M dividends

    AI IconStrategy & Ops

    • Refining: Q3 petroleum guidance throughput 205,000 to 220,000 bpd; operating expenses $110M to $120M; capex $41M to $50M
    • Fertilizer: Q3 ammonia utilization guidance 75% to 80% due to planned turnaround at East Dubuque; direct operating expenses excluding inventory/turnaround $57M to $62M; turnaround expenses $30M to $35M; capex $40M to $49M
    • Turnaround timing and projects: East Dubuque turnaround planned to start late August; brownfield capacity expansion ~+5% ammonia; finalize design this year to use natural gas as alternative feedstock
    • Refining exposure management: management intends to actively monitor crack spread swap positions and be opportunistic (including closing out or adding positions depending on market conditions)
    • RIN management: ratable purchase approach; slowed buying when RIN price started getting out of control in February; catch-up planned in Q3

    AI IconMarket Outlook

    • Q3 2026 pricing metrics (quarter-to-date): Group 3 2-1-1 cracks $58.70/bbl; Brent-WTI spread $4.82/bbl; WCS differential $14.04/bbl under WTI
    • Prompt fertilizer prices (quarter-to-date): ammonia $650 to $700/ton; UAN $325 to $350/ton
    • Management expects improved capture in Q3 as crude oil backwardation narrows
    • Spring/summer operational milestones: East Dubuque turnaround late August; expansion and feedstock-switch plan progression during 2026

    AI IconRisks & Headwinds

    • RIN/EPA uncertainty: EPA still not ruled on pending 2025 petition; EPA 9 months delinquent on Wynnewood 2020 SRE petition; compliance date for 2025 ~1 month away with unknown obligation
    • RIN price volatility and adverse economics: RIN price up >125% YoY to ~$14/bbl; RIN expense excluding RFS liability change $216M or $11.16/bbl reduces capture rate by ~25%
    • Regulatory/compliance risk: management concerns about 2026 RVO and potential for EPA to allow RIN bank to go short; expectation is EPA must take some action
    • Geopolitical refinery outages tighten supply (supportive for product cracks) but add uncertainty: Strait of Hormuz closure (reduced crude flows) and unknown Middle East restart timelines; Ukraine attacks could offline 1/3 to 1/2 of Russia refining capacity; China has halted refined product exports for several months
    • WTI backwardation headwind noted (partially offsetting petroleum EBITDA benefit); derivative realized losses also pressure results

    Q&A: Analyst Interest

    • Topic: Refining capacity/M&A funding plan given strong cash generation: Management said CVI’s strategy still is to grow barrels and diversify beyond the Southern Mid-Continent. They prioritize reducing CVI debt and view cash as separate from M&A timing; if opportunities arise, funding could come from capital markets rather than cash alone.
    • Topic: Hedging strategy specifics and expected impacts on Q3 capture: Management confirmed Q2 realized hedge loss $81M (~$4.16/bbl), about a 9% hit to capture. For Q3, total exposure is ~2.7M barrels and notional value is ~$102M; they indicated Q4 step-down and a smaller 2027 book.
    • Topic: RIN compliance outlook for 2026 and current buying behavior: Management stated they have concerns about 2026 RVO and believe EPA mismanaged the program. They intend ratable buying, slowed purchases when prices spiked in February anticipating EPA action, and plan Q3 catch-up; they confirmed Wynnewood intends to buy 50% of expected 2026 obligation.

    Sentiment: MIXED

    Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the CVI Q2 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

    Loading financial data and tables...
    © 2026 Stock Market Info — CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI) Financial Profile