Matador Resources Company

Matador Resources Company (MTDR) Market Cap

Matador Resources Company has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Joseph Wm. Foran

Sector: Energy

Industry: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

IPO Date: 2012-02-02

Website: https://www.matadorresources.com

Matador Resources Company (MTDR) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Energy

Company Profile

Matador Resources Company operates as an independent energy firm, primarily engaged in the identification, development, extraction, and acquisition of crude oil and natural gas reserves throughout the United States. Its business operations are structured into two distinct divisions: Exploration and Production, and Midstream. The company's key asset holdings are concentrated in the Wolfcamp and Bone Spring formations within the Delaware Basin, which spans southeastern New Mexico and West Texas. Additionally, Matador maintains active operations in South Texas's Eagle Ford shale play, as well as the Haynesville shale and Cotton Valley plays located in Northwest Louisiana. To support its core upstream activities, Matador also manages midstream operations. These services include natural gas processing, crude oil transportation, and the gathering of oil, natural gas, and produced water. Furthermore, the company extends produced water disposal and other gathering services to external clients. As of December 31, 2021, Matador Resources reported estimated total proved oil and natural gas reserves amounting to 323.4 million barrels of oil equivalent. This total was comprised of 181.3 million stock tank barrels of oil and 852.5 billion cubic feet of natural gas. Originally incorporated as Matador Holdco, Inc., the company officially adopted its current name, Matador Resources Company, in August 2011. Established in 2003, Matador Resources Company maintains its corporate headquarters in Dallas, Texas.

Analyst Sentiment

81%
Strong Buy

From 19 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $70.30

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$54

Median

$66

High Bound

$93

Average

$70

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$70.30
▲ +40.91% Upside
Low Target
$54.00
8% Risk
Median Target
$65.50
31% Mid
High Target
$93.00
86% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 MATADOR RESOURCES (MTDR) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Matador Resources is a U.S. independent oil and gas operator with a concentrated upstream footprint in the Permian Basin (West Texas/New Mexico). The value chain is straightforward: (1) acquire and develop subsurface acreage with repeatable well locations, (2) drill and complete horizontal wells to access multiple productive zones, (3) monetize production by selling crude oil, natural gas, and NGLs into regional marketing and transportation systems, and (4) reinvest operating cash flow into additional drilling, infill development, and field optimization.

Customer “stickiness” in upstream is not contractual in the way it is for software; it is logistical. Matador’s long-lived field infrastructure and geographic position support ongoing production and recurring access to transportation, processing, and market hubs—reducing the friction of getting barrels and molecules to buyers.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is primarily transactional but generated on an ongoing basis through continuous production:

  • Crude oil sales: the dominant revenue driver, monetized at a regional realized price after adjustments for quality and transportation differentials.
  • Natural gas sales: typically smaller in revenue contribution, with realized prices influenced by basis differentials and local supply/demand.
  • NGL sales: a meaningful margin contributor depending on fractionation and product spreads.

Margin drivers are structural rather than purely financial: (1) lease operating costs per barrel, (2) drilling and completion efficiency, (3) production mix (oil vs. gas vs. NGL), and (4) transportation/marketing differentials tied to basin location and takeaway optionality. Hedging can reduce cash-flow volatility, but the core monetization remains production-volume and cost discipline.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Moat: Geographic cost advantage plus operational repeatability in a dense infrastructure region. Matador’s competitive edge is anchored in the ability to develop a relatively concentrated acreage position in the Permian while leveraging proximity to major pipelines, processing capacity, and established service networks. This reduces effective logistics friction and supports lower all-in costs versus operators with less favorable geography or more constrained takeaway.

Why it is hard to replicate: horizontal drilling and multi-zone development create value through (1) accumulated technical learning (geology and completion optimization), (2) economies of scale in service contracting and field execution, and (3) enhanced operational continuity enabled by existing gathering/transport access. Competitors can buy acreage, but replicating performance requires time, drilling results, and operational execution to match the same cost curve.

  • EOG Resources and Pioneer Natural Resources: larger scale operators with diversified operating approaches and broader Permian exposure. Their scale can support strong capital flexibility, but they also often cover wider areas with varying quality and basin logistics constraints.
  • Diamondback Energy: a Permian-focused peer with strong development capability. Diamondback’s competitive stance tends to emphasize quality inventory and development tempo across core areas.

Matador positioning: relative to the large Permian leaders, Matador emphasizes a more concentrated operating focus and capital discipline, seeking a favorable balance of drilling efficiency, per-unit cost performance, and actionable development inventory within a dense regional infrastructure footprint.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Growth over a 5–10 year horizon is driven less by market share gains and more by disciplined development of existing resource inventory and improving unit economics:

  • Infill and drilling inventory conversion: expanding production through additional wells placed in repeatable patterns and development of existing acreage positions.
  • Completion and production optimization: better well performance through refinements in drilling/completion design, operational timing, and reservoir management.
  • Field-level efficiency: lowering operating costs through maintenance discipline, logistics planning, and service procurement advantages typical of operators operating in established basins.
  • Infrastructure tailwinds: the Permian’s ongoing buildout of gathering, processing, and transportation networks supports access to markets and reduces the risk of localized bottlenecks.

Total addressable market expansion is fundamentally about sustaining long-run U.S. hydrocarbon supply through shale development, where the “TAM” for a basin operator equates to recoverable reserves that can be developed at competitive cycle-through costs.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Commodity price and basis risk: realized economics depend on crude, NGL, and gas prices plus regional differentials that can swing with supply patterns and takeaway utilization.
  • Capital intensity and execution risk: development requires continued capital deployment; missteps in drilling efficiency, completion effectiveness, or timing can impair returns.
  • Decline rate and reservoir performance uncertainty: production profiles can deviate from type curves, affecting multi-year volume and cost assumptions.
  • Regulatory and environmental constraints: methane monitoring rules, flaring limits, water management requirements, and state/federal enforcement can raise costs and constrain operations.
  • Transportation and midstream availability: even within a dense basin, localized takeaway or processing constraints can affect netbacks and realized pricing.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Equity markets typically value U.S. independent E&Ps on cash-flow and asset-value frameworks rather than long-duration growth metrics. Common valuation lenses include:

  • EV/EBITDAX or P/CF-type multiples driven by expected production, operating costs, and the earnings power of the development inventory.
  • Net asset value / reserve value proxies reflecting reserve quality, cost structure, and recoverable barrels at cycle-through prices.
  • Return-on-invested-capital sensitivity: investors focus on credible drilling economics (type-curve support), balance-sheet resilience, and disciplined capital allocation.

Key drivers that move valuation in this peer set include cost per flowing barrel, the credibility of drilling inventory conversion, realized differential behavior (especially for oil), and capital discipline that preserves financial flexibility through commodity cycles.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Matador Resources offers an investment thesis rooted in basin economics: concentrated Permian exposure supported by logistical proximity to infrastructure, operational repeatability from developed acreage, and a cost structure that can be attractive across commodity cycles. The long-term opportunity is primarily the conversion of drilling inventory into durable production with disciplined capital deployment, tempered by the need to manage commodity volatility, regulatory pressure, and execution risk inherent to upstream operations.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"MTDR reported Q1’26 Revenue of $671.6M and Net Income of -$35.9M (EPS -$0.29). Versus Q1’25, Revenue fell -33.2% YoY, and Net Income deteriorated from +$240.1M to -$35.9M (down 115.0% YoY). QoQ, Revenue declined -20.8% (vs. Q4’25 $848.0M) and Net Income swung from +$192.5M to -$35.9M. Profitability weakened sharply: Net margin contracted to -5.3% in Q1’26 from +22.7% in Q1’25 and +22.7% in Q4’25. Operating income also collapsed to $46.8M (operating margin 7.0%) from $212.4M (25.0%) in Q4’25. Cash flow remains a relative bright spot—Operating Cash Flow was +$470.5M and Free Cash Flow was +$470.5M in Q1’26 (no PP&E capex reported), but this contrasts with Q4’25 where FCF was -$113.6M. Balance sheet resilience looks mixed: Total assets were $12.2B, while total equity was $5.91B (equity slightly higher vs. Q4’25). Debt increased materially (long-term debt $2.37B; total debt $2.37B) and net debt rose to $2.34B. Total shareholder returns appear strongly positive: the stock is up +38.6% over 1 year, and the dividend yield is ~0.6%. Buybacks are present but limited (repurchased -$0.7M in Q1’26)."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

Q1’26 Revenue of $671.6M declined -33.2% YoY (vs. $1.006B in Q1’25) and -20.8% QoQ (vs. $848.0M in Q4’25). The trajectory is clearly down over the last 4 quarters.

Profitability

Neutral

Net Income fell to -$35.9M in Q1’26 from +$240.1M in Q1’25 (EPS -0.29 vs. +1.92). Net margin contracted to -5.3% from +23.9% in Q1’25 and from +22.7% in Q4’25; operating margin also dropped sharply QoQ.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Despite the loss, Operating Cash Flow was strong at +$470.5M in Q1’26, and Free Cash Flow was +$470.5M (capex not reported in this quarter). However, this is volatile versus Q4’25 when FCF was -$113.6M and dividends were still paid (-$46.8M).

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Fair

Total assets increased to ~$12.17B and equity was $5.91B, indicating a stable capital base. Debt increased to ~$2.37B and net debt was ~$2.34B, which reduces flexibility, but leverage remains manageable given the sizable equity.

Shareholder Returns

Positive

Stock performance is strong: +38.55% 1Y change (momentum >20% materially lifts the score). Dividend yield is ~0.6% with continued payments, while buybacks were modest in Q1’26 (-$0.7M).

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

Given current price ~$55.6 and a consensus target around $68.29, upside appears moderate (~+23%). Valuation metrics are less reliable during earnings losses (negative P/E), and the recent profitability deterioration raises execution risk.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

So What?: MTDR’s Q1 2026 call focused on sustaining profitable, measured growth despite macro volatility and negative Waha exposure. Management’s growth framework centers on production ramp (supported by accelerated well turn-ins in Q1) while explicitly prioritizing debt reduction and keeping a lid on capital. The key economic lever is midstream integration: San Mateo provides flow assurance and operational control, and the Hubrinson pathway is expected to shift gas exposure away from Waha toward Henry Hub, with management estimating up to ~$0.50/mcf advantage. Operational/cost trajectory is reinforced through reiterated D&C guidance ($785–$805, aiming for sub-$800) and a quantified set of execution levers: electric fleets with ~90% diesel reduction, >70% recycled water with incremental expansion, and AI/MaxComm driving faster drilling and real-time completion optimization. Woodford is framed as upside rather than booked inventory, with July expected productivity discussion.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Wells turned online in Q1 plus acceleration of activity (two additional net wells turned online in the quarter), supporting production growth while keeping full-year turn-in-line count unchanged
  • Fully integrated midstream with San Mateo and Hubrinson catalyst to alleviate negative Waha pricing in the back half of 2026
  • Operational and completion efficiency initiatives supporting faster leading wells into future quarters (AI + electric fleets + Simul/TrimalFrac + water recycling improvements)

Business Development

  • Hubrinson expansion/reconfiguration referenced as moving gas exposure away from Waha toward Henry Hub pricing (partner/operator relationship referenced with ET as Hubrinson operator)
  • San Mateo strategic relationship with ET described as continuing to expand
  • Dropdowns/further strategic alternatives for San Mateo discussed as value-forwarding transactions; no cash need stated

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • No EPS/revenue figures or bps margin movements were provided in the transcript
  • D&C per lateral-foot guidance range reiterated: $785 to $805 (about 6% below 2025), with explicit intent to finish toward the bottom end (sub-$800 trajectory)
  • Capital cadence guidance reiterated from February: spend 55% to 60% of the budget in the first half; Q1 on track vs expectations; back half expected to be lower than Q2 with both Q3 and Q4 down from Q2
  • Tax/tariff impacts: none mentioned

AI IconCapital Funding

  • No explicit buyback amounts, debt levels, or cash runway disclosed in the transcript
  • Management emphasized reduced debt and controlled capital spending, stating the balance sheet is in its best position during the company’s history

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • CapEx cadence: first half weighting maintained; guidance tied to higher first-half turns-in-line (about 50% occurring in the first half), implying a sizable drop in the back half
  • Efficiency/cost levers quantified: ~90% reduction in diesel usage via full utilization of electric fleets; water recycling already exceeded 70% of water from recycled sources in 2026 (in-progress push higher)
  • D&C efficiency: AI integration and MaxComm (AI/optimization) noted, with records set for 3-mile U-turns and drilling/landing milestones
  • Field gas optimization: using field-use gas instead of trucked compressed natural gas saves an average of $100,000 per well; at negative Waha, they burn gas in-field for frac rather than selling at negative pricing
  • Midstream/ops: new water recycling facility construction began in Q1 to increase upstream CapEx savings and to grow San Mateo revenue
  • Woodford positioning: first Woodford well successfully drilled and cased; completions ongoing; not included in current inventory/reserves/lease position (upside if successful)

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • CapEx guidance for H1 retained: 55% to 60% of the annual budget spent in the first half; back-half quarters expected lower than Q2
  • D&C target trajectory: maintain toward $785 to $805 range and finish toward bottom end (implying sub-$800 intent)
  • Woodford next disclosure: management expects to discuss productivity/expectations on the next call in July

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Macro volatility acknowledged explicitly (oil price moving around and business environment variable), driving need for nimble plans
  • Negative Waha pricing pressure referenced; mitigated via Hubrinson/Henry Hub exposure shift
  • Woodford success uncertainty: still early and not counted in current inventory/reserves/lease position (risk that results may not meet expectations)
  • Analyst uncertainty around capital cadence precision for Q3/Q4; management stated too early for precise cadence beyond directionality

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Growth drivers/plan: Management said growth emphasis is on production in, debt paid down, and holding capital spending. They framed optionality around constraints like takeaway and inventory availability, citing 10–15 years inventory, 50%+ returns, and midstream catalysts to reduce negative Waha exposure.
  • San Mateo strategic options: Management described San Mateo as strategically valuable for flow assurance, operational control, and monetizable efficiencies (water recycling and gas routing). Options discussed included potentially taking it public, plus dropdowns/alternatives, but they emphasized they do not need cash and will only proceed with value-accretive deals.
  • AI implementation and efficiency results: Management described a controlled, committee-driven AI rollout to avoid missteps. They cited >40 million data points daily with real-time control-room monitoring to reduce downtime; on completions, monitoring pressures/volumes and logistics; and with MaxComm, multiple drilling record achievements, including improved lateral targeting and faster drilling.

Sentiment: POSITIVE

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the MTDR Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — Matador Resources Company (MTDR) Financial Profile