Newmont Corporation

Newmont Corporation (NEM) Market Cap

Newmont Corporation has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Natascha Viljoen

Sector: Basic Materials

Industry: Gold

IPO Date: 1980-03-17

Website: https://www.newmont.com

Newmont Corporation (NEM) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Basic Materials

Company Profile

Newmont Corporation is primarily involved in the mining and exploration of gold resources. Additionally, the company undertakes prospecting for other base and precious metals, including copper, silver, zinc, and lead. Its operations and assets are geographically widespread, located across various countries such as the United States, Canada, Mexico, the Dominican Republic, Peru, Suriname, Argentina, Chile, Australia, and Ghana. As of the close of 2021 (December 31st), Newmont reported substantial proven and probable gold reserves, totaling 92.8 million ounces, and managed a vast land portfolio covering 62,800 square kilometers. Founded in 1916, the company's corporate headquarters are situated in Denver, Colorado.

Analyst Sentiment

79%
Strong Buy

From 23 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $141.90

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$120

Median

$140

High Bound

$175

Average

$142

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$141.90
▲ +51.42% Upside
Low Target
$120.00
28% Risk
Median Target
$140.00
49% Mid
High Target
$175.00
87% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 NEWMONT (NEM) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Newmont is a globally diversified gold producer with additional revenue contributions from by-products (notably copper in certain assets). The value chain is primarily: (1) exploration and resource development, (2) mine construction and commissioning, (3) extraction and processing into gold doré/metal concentrates, (4) refining/sales into commodity markets, and (5) ongoing sustaining capital to maintain throughput and resource conversion. Operational performance is determined by geology (ore grade/strip ratio), metallurgy, and execution (uptime, recoveries, maintenance, and cost discipline). The company’s “customer stickiness” is not contractual—rather, its stickiness comes from owning and operating long-lived, lower-cost ore bodies and the permitting/social framework required to keep production running reliably.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is predominantly transactional and commodity-linked: gold sales drive the majority of top-line value, with by-product credits improving realized economics. Margin structure is governed by the spread between realized commodity prices and all-in operating costs, typically influenced by:

  • Production economics (grades, recoveries, strip ratios): higher-quality ore and better recovery translate into more gold per tonne processed.
  • By-product credits: where present, base/other metal credits can materially lower net cash costs per ounce.
  • Energy, labor, and consumables: cost inflation or supply disruptions can compress margins.
  • Logistics and metallurgy: transport routes, concentrate treatment terms, and processing efficiency affect conversion costs.
  • Sustaining capital and closure/responsibility costs: long-term cost profiles are shaped by required ongoing investment and asset retirement obligations.

Because the business sells into liquid commodity markets, the monetisation model is best viewed as a cost-curve business: the company’s earnings power is highly sensitive to commodity prices, but structural profitability depends on its ability to sit below the industry cost curve consistently.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Newmont’s moat is primarily cost advantages and geographic/asset quality advantages, reinforced by the operational know-how required to run large, complex mines and maintain permitting/social license.

  • Cost advantages (low-cost ore bodies): competitors face natural constraints when trying to replicate geology and operating characteristics. Newmont’s advantage is embedded in its portfolio of ore bodies and processing routes that support competitive all-in costs.
  • Geographic cost and logistical positioning: proximity to infrastructure (power supply, water access, transport corridors, and export routes where relevant) can reduce unit costs and operational downtime risk.
  • Scale and operational learning: large production bases support better procurement leverage, maintenance systems, and standardized operating practices across sites.
  • Regulatory and social license barriers: mining is subject to permitting complexity, tailings and environmental compliance, and stakeholder requirements—capabilities that take time and capital to build and are hard to replicate quickly.

Competitive benchmarking:

  • Barrick Gold: tends to be concentrated in a set of large-scale operations with strong cost positioning, with a different portfolio mix across jurisdictions and asset types.
  • Agnico Eagle Mines: often features a heavy focus on high-quality, long-lived assets in specific regions, with a portfolio profile that can differ materially from Newmont’s scale and geographic spread.
  • AngloGold Ashanti: historically has placed emphasis on certain legacy operations and regional exposure, leading to different cost structures and maturity profiles.

Positioning contrast: Newmont’s industry focus emphasizes a diversified, global base of producing assets and long-dated resource positions intended to maintain a competitive cost curve through cycles, whereas peers’ portfolios typically skew toward different regional mixes, operational maturities, and by-product/cost structures.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Growth over a 5–10 year horizon is less about “volume growth at any price” and more about sustaining and extending the production base with disciplined capital allocation. Key drivers include:

  • Resource conversion and reserve replacement: ongoing exploration, development drilling, and resource-to-reserve work underpin future production continuity.
  • Brownfield expansion and debottlenecking: improving throughput, recovery, and equipment utilization can increase output without proportionate increases in fixed cost.
  • Sustaining capital execution: maintaining recoveries and uptime through proper maintenance and life-of-mine planning directly supports longer-term earnings power.
  • Cost curve improvements: process optimization, energy efficiency initiatives, and supply chain improvements can lower all-in costs, expanding profitability when commodity prices soften.
  • Capital allocation discipline: prioritizing projects with robust economics, manageable jurisdictional risk, and clear pathways to lower unit costs can compound per-ounce value across the cycle.

On a broader TAM basis, the addressable market is global gold supply/demand and incremental by-product contributions tied to ore processing. For miners, the practical “TAM expansion” is realized through reserves, not through demand-driven share gains; therefore, the most durable growth path is reserve longevity plus cost competitiveness.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Commodity price volatility: gold and by-product metal prices drive revenue and can overwhelm operational improvements during downcycles.
  • Cost inflation and input volatility: energy costs, labor, reagents, and equipment availability can pressure margins.
  • Geopolitical and jurisdictional risk: permitting changes, operating restrictions, taxation/regulatory evolution, and security conditions can impact cash flows.
  • Execution risk in large assets: production continuity depends on uptime, tailings and water management, and ongoing capital discipline.
  • ESG and regulatory compliance: tailings safety, water stewardship, and community relations can lead to schedule changes or incremental compliance costs.
  • Balance sheet and capital intensity: sustaining and development capital requirements can influence flexibility if commodity conditions deteriorate.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Equity valuation in this sector typically reflects a mix of commodity-linked earnings power and asset-level fundamentals. Common frameworks include:

  • EV/EBITDA or EV/operating cash flow (cyclically adjusted): emphasizes expected margin durability and cost position across cycles.
  • Sum-of-the-parts / NAV-based approaches: focus on discounted cash flows from individual mines, sensitive to grade, AISC/cost curve assumptions, capex, closure obligations, and jurisdictional risk.

Key valuation drivers that tend to move multiples over time include: cost curve positioning, reserve/production profile credibility, project execution quality, and balance-sheet strength relative to sustaining and development needs.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Newmont’s long-term investment case is anchored in a cost-curve moat supported by global asset quality, logistics/infrastructure positioning, operational scale, and the regulatory/social capabilities required to sustain production. In a business where share gains are limited and profits are driven by unit economics, the most enduring differentiators are reserve longevity, consistent execution, and the ability to maintain competitive all-in costs through commodity cycles.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-06-30

"NEM reported Q2 2026 results with Revenue of $3.454B and Net Income of $2.202B (EPS $2.07). QoQ, Revenue fell sharply from $7.183B in Q1 2026 to $3.454B (down ~51.9%), while Net Income declined from $3.262B (down ~32.5%). However, on a YoY basis, performance was substantially higher: Revenue grew from $5.275B in Q2 2025 to $3.454B in Q2 2026 (down ~34.6%—notably weaker), but Net Income increased from $2.061B to $2.202B (up ~6.9%). Profitability is volatile quarter-to-quarter. Net margin expanded dramatically vs Q1 (from 45.4% to 63.8%), and operating margin rose to 31.8% from 60.6% in Q1, reflecting major swings in below-the-line/other income items. Cash generation remains strong: operating cash flow was $2.924B and free cash flow $2.205B in Q2. Shareholder returns look favorable, with strong price momentum (1Y change +108.2%) and a small dividend yield (~0.28%). The company also continued capital returns via buybacks (repurchased ~$1.567B of stock) and paid dividends (~$277M), supporting total return even with earnings volatility. Balance sheet resilience is solid: total assets were $57.6B, equity ~$35.6B, and net debt remains negative (net cash) at about -$3.5B, improving financial flexibility."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

Revenue declined QoQ ($7.183B to $3.454B, ~-51.9%) and was also lower YoY ($5.275B to $3.454B, ~-34.6%), indicating weaker top-line trajectory despite earnings strength.

Profitability

Positive

Net income rose YoY (~+6.9% to $2.202B) while margins were highly volatile. Net margin improved vs Q1 (45.4% to 63.8%) but was structurally different across quarters, suggesting earnings supported by non-operating/other drivers.

Cash Flow Quality

Good

Operating cash flow was strong at $2.924B and free cash flow $2.205B in Q2. Buybacks ($1.567B) and dividends ($277M) were supported by cash generation.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Good

Balance sheet is resilient with equity ~ $35.6B and net debt remaining negative (net cash ~ -$3.5B). Total assets were stable around $57.6B QoQ.

Shareholder Returns

Strong

Total shareholder momentum is strong: price is up ~+108.2% over the last year and the dividend yield is ~0.28%. Capital returns via meaningful buybacks further lift overall return profile.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

With the stock at ~$116.5 and consensus target ~$141.9 (implied upside ~22%), valuation appears moderately supportive; however, earnings volatility and mixed revenue trend temper conviction.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

Newmont delivered a strong Q2 with operating leverage: $2.2B free cash flow and adjusted net income of $2.10/share, supported by a ~33% YoY realized gold price increase while absolute costs rose only ~4%. Gold AISC of $1,621/oz sits below full-year guidance ($1,680/oz). Production timing improved to a 49%/51% H1/H2 split, with Q3 expected near Q2 levels and Q4 still guided as the strongest quarter. Management emphasized disciplined cost actions (including parking nearly 50 units, +~15% per-shift productivity at Cerro Negro) but acknowledged renewed energy-driven inflation risk from ~$100/bbl oil translating into diesel costs into Q3, plus indirect escalation risks under monitoring. Key operational catalysts include Cadia restart milestones and Red Chris regulatory progress, with feasibility and Board submission targeted toward end-2026. Capital remains focused on $1.95B sustaining and $1.4B development, while $6B authorization continues with ~$4.3B remaining.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Red Chris Block Cave regulatory approvals; advancing feasibility study toward Board approval/FID later in 2026
  • Cadia recovery: operating caves resumed in mid-June; continued ground support upgrades; planned cave restart approvals later in 2026
  • Ahafo North ramp-up to full run rate and expected stronger Q4 production
  • Lihir Nearshore Barrier access ramp-up in Q3; unlock access to >5 million ounces beginning in 2028
  • Tanami expansion: second expansion progressing; all underground infrastructure expected completed by end of Q3
  • Brownfields production upside: Lihir Nearshore Barrier (approved), Cerro Negro expansion online early-year after productivity improvements, Merian and Brucejack near-mine exploration

Business Development

  • Red Chris Block Cave: consent-based amended Environmental Assessment Certificate with the Tahltan Nation
  • Canadian government support for Red Chris: Major Project Office MOU under discussion (grant terms/conditions not finalized)
  • Nevada Gold Mines JV: stable performance referenced in Q2 outlook

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Cash flow strength: $3.8B adjusted EBITDA; adjusted net income of $2.10/share; $2.9B cash flow from operations after working capital; $2.2B record free cash flow in Q2
  • Shareholder returns: repurchased >$1.7B shares since last call under $6B April authorization; >$600M repurchased in July to date; declared dividend $0.26/share (unchanged QoQ)
  • Margin/cost drivers: realized gold price +~$1,100/oz (+~33% YoY) while absolute cost applicable to sales +~4% YoY, supporting operating leverage
  • Gold AISC: $1,621/oz (byproduct basis), below full-year guidance of $1,680/oz
  • Third-quarter cost outlook: ~$150M QoQ increase in sustaining capital expected, driving moderately higher unit costs in Q3
  • Working capital: modest cash use; reclamation spending at Yanacocha; inventory/stockpile builds; potential unwinding of receivable benefit in H2

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Sustaining capital: $438M invested in Q2; full-year sustaining capital guidance $1.95B
  • Development capital: $285M invested in Q2; full-year development guidance $1.4B; expected 63% weighted to H2
  • Net cash: $3.4B at quarter-end, modestly above upper end of $1B net cash target band (±$2B)
  • Share repurchase authorization: $6B approved in April; repurchased $1.7B since last earnings call; ~$4.3B remaining after July to date
  • Dividend framework: repurchase-based formula implies next annual review (Feb, subject to Board approval) could support $0.27/share quarterly dividend ($0.01 above current quarterly; ~$0.04 annualized)

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Operational timing: delivered 49% of full-year production in H1 (51% expected in H2)
  • Production pathway: Q3 expected broadly in line with Q2; Q4 expected strongest year as Lihir completes planned maintenance and Ahafo North reaches full run rate
  • Cost productivity actions: parked nearly 50 mining production units without affecting production; Cerro Negro underground productive time +~15% per shift via more efficient pre-start activities
  • Portfolio cost mitigation: reduced contract utilization where possible; targeted milling efficiency investments at Ahafo North; wet-weather preparedness and road conditions at Merian
  • Cadia restart: mid-June production resumed from operating caves; continuing ground support upgrades; PC1-2 development rates returned to normal; cave establishment at both caves planned to restart later in 2026 pending regulatory approvals

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Guidance posture: 'on track' to achieve full-year 2026 guidance; unit cost ranges held despite second-quarter diesel/oil pressure
  • Production split update: ~49% delivered in first half; 51% second half
  • Q3 production: broadly in line with Q2 before pick-up in Q4
  • Red Chris milestone timing: feasibility steps to complete toward end of 2026 for Board submission (FID timing 'later this year' per Q&A)
  • Net cash target range and flexibility: cash position expected to fluctuate with capital/dividends and macro; remain toward upper end in stronger price environment

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Energy-driven inflation risk: management cited oil jumping to ~$100/bbl; expected diesel cost pressure to continue into Q3 with site-specific lags
  • Indirect cost escalation monitoring: explosives, cyanide, grinding media, and labor contractor spend; freight impacts to indirects
  • Geopolitical uncertainty: management monitoring potential cost implications despite current cost control
  • Working capital variability: possible unwinding of receivable benefit recorded in Q2 during H2
  • Capital cost inflation risk for projects: Red Chris capital expected higher than original Newcrest numbers, driven by sector inflation and productivity focus
  • Legal/JV risk overhang: Barrick discussions/notice of default and unresolved JV management/commercial issues; management declined to answer specifics

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Topic: Second-half cost inflation from oil/diesel and freight—Management response: Oil price jump to about $100/bbl flowed into Q2 cost via fuel costs (about $100/bbl average). Expect continued Q3 pressure due to diesel timing lags by site. Also monitoring indirect escalations (explosives, cyanide, grinding media, labor contractors, freight) but largely in a monitoring stage; every $10/bbl impacts about $60M full-year.
  • Topic: Red Chris Canadian government support form and implications—Management response: For the ~$500M Canadian government support referenced by the analyst, management said terms are still being worked through via an MOU with Canada’s Major Project Office. They have not finalized whether it is a grant, loan, or other mechanism, but remain encouraged by the government’s confidence and support.
  • Topic: Red Chris feasibility/FID timeline, capital inflation mitigation, and revised construction assumptions—Management response: With main regulatory approvals behind them, they are completing rigorous internal technical and financial feasibility steps, including independent internal review and hurdle-rate economic lens. Capital expected higher due to sector inflation and productivity attention. Delay vs prior timeline reflects bringing feasibility back to Newmont standards and learning from last year’s fall of ground; completion targeted end of 2026 for Board consideration.

Sentiment: POSITIVE

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the NEM Q2 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — Newmont Corporation (NEM) Financial Profile