NMI Holdings, Inc.

NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) Market Cap

NMI Holdings, Inc. has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Adam S. Pollitzer

Sector: Financial Services

Industry: Insurance - Specialty

IPO Date: 2013-11-08

Website: https://www.nationalmi.com

NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Financial Services

Company Profile

NMI Holdings, Inc. is a company operating within the United States that offers private mortgage guaranty insurance. In addition to its core insurance products, the firm also delivers outsourced loan assessment services, specifically catering to mortgage loan originators. Its diverse client roster includes national and regional mortgage banks, prominent money center banks, credit unions, local community banks, builder-owned lenders, internet-based lending platforms, and other non-bank mortgage providers. The company commenced operations after its incorporation in 2011 and is based in Emeryville, California.

Analyst Sentiment

86%
Strong Buy

From 7 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $46.00

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$46

Median

$46

High Bound

$46

Average

$46

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$46.00
▲ +3.84% Upside
Low Target
$46.00
4% Risk
Median Target
$46.00
4% Mid
High Target
$46.00
4% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 NMI HOLDINGS INC (NMIH) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

NMI Holdings Inc. operates in the private mortgage insurance (PMI) ecosystem. The core “how it works” is straightforward: mortgage lenders extend loans that exceed a certain risk threshold (often higher loan-to-value exposures). NMI provides credit protection for the insurer’s share of default risk, enabling lenders to originate loans that may otherwise be constrained by capital or risk limits. In return, NMI earns mortgage insurance premiums over the life of insured loans and recognizes losses when insured loans default and complete claims.

This business model creates a direct link between (1) mortgage production volume, (2) underwriting and pricing discipline, and (3) the performance of the underlying credit pool through the housing cycle.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

  • Mortgage insurance premiums (primary recurring revenue): Premiums are typically earned on an insured population and generally scale with new insurance written and the persistency/remaining insured life of the existing book.
  • Investment income (supporting revenue): Premiums received in advance can be invested, with earnings driven by yield, duration, and risk management within regulatory constraints.
  • Other insurance-related income (supplemental): May include fees and administrative items tied to the insurance platform and portfolio mechanics.

Margin drivers are dominated by loss severity and loss frequency (credit performance), premium adequacy (pricing discipline vs. risk), and expense discipline. The key economic lever is not fee growth; it is the spread between earned premiums and the all-in cost of claims plus operating costs, supported by capital and regulatory requirements.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

NMIH’s moat is best characterized as a regulatory + credit-underwriting moat, reinforced by portfolio “seasoning” effects (information gained over time on default behavior) and scale in insurance operations.

  • Regulatory moat (capital & compliance): Mortgage insurance is capital-sensitive. Regulatory and statutory capital requirements create durable barriers for new entrants and for lenders/insurers that cannot sustain the underwriting and capital discipline needed across cycles.
  • Credit culture and pricing sophistication: Consistent performance depends on underwriting standards, risk-based pricing, and the ability to adjust models and premium rates to changing credit conditions. Competitors that misprice risk experience asymmetric earnings volatility.
  • Portfolio knowledge and claims experience: The insurer’s historical data improves risk calibration over time, supporting tighter premium adequacy and loss forecasting.
  • Competitors: MGIC Investment Corp. (MGIC), Radian Group Inc. (RDN), and Essent Group Ltd. (ESNT).
  • Contrast in industry focus: Like NMIH, these peers participate in the private mortgage insurance market. The differentiation is typically expressed in underwriting approach, premium adequacy practices, and portfolio management rather than a fundamentally different product. In practice, NMIH’s positioning is strongest when its risk selection and claims management maintain favorable economics through housing-cycle variability.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

  • Structural demand for risk transfer in residential lending: Private mortgage insurance supports mortgage originations by transferring a portion of default risk, which can remain structurally relevant when borrowers have down payments that create higher risk exposures.
  • Housing turnover and new issuance volumes: Over a 5–10 year horizon, mortgage origination and insured loan counts are influenced by housing turnover, demographic migration, and affordability dynamics—factors that sustain baseline demand for mortgage credit enhancement products.
  • Portfolio persistency and lifecycle economics: The existing insured book can generate premiums over time, and disciplined management can improve persistency and loss outcomes, supporting more stable earnings profiles.
  • Risk-based pricing and product/portfolio optimization: Competitors that can continuously refine risk selection can expand premium adequacy during credit regime shifts, improving long-run returns on regulatory capital.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Credit-cycle risk: Deterioration in unemployment, home prices, or borrower credit quality can increase claim rates and severity, pressuring profitability and capital adequacy.
  • Pricing/model risk: Underwriting models and assumptions can lag turning points in housing or borrower behavior, creating loss emergence that exceeds premium expectations.
  • Regulatory and capital regime changes: Changes to capital requirements, reserving practices, or insurer oversight can affect the economics of the business and constrain growth.
  • Concentration and portfolio mix shifts: Changes in insured loan characteristics (region, credit score bands, loan-to-value mix) can alter expected loss dynamics.
  • Operational and catastrophe-like dynamics (housing-specific): Mortgage insurance is not “catastrophic” in the natural-disaster sense, but severe local housing declines can produce non-linear loss outcomes.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Mortgage insurers are typically valued on book value durability and normalized returns on regulatory capital rather than on growth multiples alone. Market sentiment often tracks the relationship between:

  • Loss ratio trajectory (claims vs. earned premiums)
  • Statutory capital quality and capital buffer
  • Premium adequacy across the cycle
  • Earnings stability vs. cyclicality

In practice, valuation tends to improve when investors believe the insurer’s underwriting and capital management can sustain attractive underwriting spreads through downturns, while valuation compresses when credit expectations deteriorate or capital appears insufficient for the risk profile.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

NMI Holdings Inc. offers exposure to the private mortgage insurance market, where long-term economics hinge on disciplined underwriting, regulatory-capital strength, and a track record of pricing adequacy. The investment thesis is durable if NMIH maintains a favorable relationship between earned premiums and claim outcomes, while managing capital prudently across housing-cycle regimes—an advantage that is difficult to replicate without sustained credit culture and underwriting expertise.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-06-30

"NMIH (2026-06-30, Q2) reported revenue of $187.9M (+2.37% QoQ, +8.15% YoY) and net income of $105.8M (+6.54% QoQ, +10.01% YoY). EPS was $1.40, up from $1.30 in Q1 and $1.23 in Q2’25. Profitability appears to be shifting: net margin stayed strong (~56% in Q2), but gross margin deteriorated sharply (from ~88.7% in Q1 to -86.7% in Q2). Operating income remained positive at $-124.9M in the income statement, with the quarter showing unusual line-item behavior (very large “otherExpenses/totalOtherIncomeExpensesNet” impacts). Net income growth still outpaced revenue, suggesting below-the-line items supported earnings this quarter. Cash generation improved: operating cash flow rose to $142.6M (+22.8% QoQ, +11.2% YoY) and free cash flow was $143.7M. The company repurchased shares ($32.3M in Q2) and paid no dividends. On total shareholder returns, the stock price is up 19.62% over the last year (strong, but just below the >20% “high momentum” threshold). With a consensus price target of $46 versus a current ~$39.99, the valuation outlook implies meaningful upside, supported by continued earnings and cash flow growth, even with quarter-to-quarter margin volatility."

Revenue Growth

Good

Revenue grew +2.37% QoQ (183.5M to 187.9M) and +8.15% YoY (178.7M to 187.9M), indicating a steady upward trajectory.

Profitability

Fair

Net margin remained high (~56%). However, gross margin collapsed from 88.7% in Q1 to -86.7% in Q2, and operating income/margin shows extreme volatility, suggesting quarter-specific line-item effects despite EPS rising to $1.40.

Cash Flow Quality

Good

Operating cash flow increased to $142.6M (+22.8% QoQ, +11.2% YoY) and free cash flow was $143.7M. Continued buybacks (~$32.3M) with no dividend payments.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Neutral

Equity remains very large (total stockholders’ equity ~$2.71T). Total assets increased to ~$3.997T from ~$3.910T QoQ, showing balance sheet expansion; however, the provided balance-sheet line items are atypical (e.g., net receivables and other assets), so resilience is inferred mainly from strong equity base.

Shareholder Returns

Positive

1-year price gain of +19.62% plus ongoing buybacks supports total return. Momentum is strong but slightly below the >20% threshold; dividend yield is 0%.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Positive

Consensus price target is $46 vs current ~$39.99 (meaningful upside). No valuation “1y” momentum boost from analyst targets is provided, but earnings/cash growth supports the bullish stance.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

NMIH delivered another strong Q2 2026 performance anchored by underwriting selectivity and record production. The company generated $16B of NIW and ended with record $227.1B of primary insurance in force, while sustaining yield metrics: net yield held at 28 bps and core yield at 34 bps (both unchanged sequentially). Profitability and operating discipline were notable—revenue hit a record $187.9M (+2.4% QoQ), adjusted net income rose to $106M (+7% QoQ), and adjusted EPS reached $1.38 (+8% QoQ). The expense ratio improved to 19.4% from 19.8%. Credit remained resilient with no early signs of underwriting stress, though management expects defaults to rise seasonally into Q3 and Q4. Capital allocation stayed active with $31.4M of buybacks in the quarter and $1.6B excess PMIERs assets. In Q&A, management leaned into a “balanced” competitive posture, preferred traditional reinsurance for speed and forward pricing, and downplayed near-term impact from the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Record $16B NIW volume in Q2 2026
  • Primary insurance in force grew to a record $227.1B
  • Strong 81.4% 12-month persistency (down from 82.2% in Q1) supporting yield stability
  • Credit performance resilience: no “underwriting strain” or early-payment default issues emerging; HPA and labor market strength cited as supportive

Business Development

    AI IconFinancial Highlights

    • Revenue: $187.9M record; +2.4% QoQ and +8.1% YoY
    • Adjusted net income: $106M record; +7% QoQ and +10% YoY
    • EPS (adjusted diluted): $1.38 record; +8% QoQ and +14% YoY
    • ROE: 15.9% in Q2 2026 (implied “record” operating performance)
    • Net premiums earned: $157.5M (Q2 2026) vs $154.8M (Q1 2026) and $149.1M (Q2 2025)
    • Net yield: 28 bps in Q2, unchanged vs Q1
    • Core yield (ex reinsurance cost and cancellation earnings): 34 bps in Q2, unchanged vs Q1
    • Expense ratio improved to 19.4% vs 19.8% in Q1 (expenses $30.5M vs $30.6M QoQ)
    • Defaults: 8,020 at June 30 vs 8,044 at March 31; default rate 1.16% at quarter end
    • Claims expense: $13.1M in Q2 vs $20.7M in Q1 (and $13.4M in Q2 2025)
    • Seasonality acknowledged: default/credit tailwinds early-year (tax refunds/bonuses/holidays) reverse in 2H
    • Buyback impact/capital: repurchased $31.4M in Q2, retiring 827k shares at avg $37.99

    AI IconCapital Funding

    • Share repurchases: $31.4M in Q2 2026; $408M total since program start (2022)
    • Program status: $167M remaining capacity under existing program
    • PMIERs: $3.7B total available assets; $2.1B risk-based required assets; $1.6B excess available assets
    • Equity: shareholders’ equity $2.7B at June 30; book value per share $35.89

    AI IconStrategy & Ops

    • Reinsurance positioning: more focus on traditional reinsurance forms (quota share/excess of loss), while still valuing ILN; rationale includes faster execution and forward flow coverage locking pricing up to ~3 years
    • Capital markets (ILN/securitization) described as requiring warehousing risk and larger transaction size; less flexible vs reinsurance
    • Use of risk transfer solutions to support portfolio quality and planning horizon
    • Expense management: continued efficiency; no large planned discretionary expenditures flagged

    AI IconMarket Outlook

    • No company guidance provided (explicitly stated in Q&A)
    • Next event: Barclays Financial Services Conference on September 15th

    AI IconRisks & Headwinds

    • Seasonal credit deterioration expected: defaults to trend higher from here; normalizes with third-quarter rise and further increase in fourth quarter
    • Regional housing pressure areas: Florida, Texas, parts of Sun Belt, Mountain West, and some pressure on the West Coast noted
    • Macro sensitivity: management emphasized watching macroeconomic environment closely as determinant of outcomes
    • Persistency declined to 81.4% from 82.2% QoQ (potential yield sensitivity, though core yield unchanged)

    Q&A: Analyst Interest

    • Topic: Credit environment and house-price trajectory—Management: Adam cited nationally encouraging month-to-month housing price readings and support for affordability needs that increase with higher prices. Geo-by-geo, Northeast and Midwest remain strongest, while pressure persists in Florida/Texas/Sun Belt/Mountain West and parts of the West Coast; latest MSAs show bottoming and slight improvement.
    • Topic: Default trend drivers and cures—Management: Aurora attributed the marginally lower defaults to seasonal dynamics (tax refunds, year-end bonuses, holidays) and reinforced strong macro indicators like employment and HPA performance. She emphasized no provided guidance, but noted 1H tailwinds turning into 2H headwinds. Adam added defaults should trend higher, with typical Q3 and Q4 increases.
    • Topic: Reinsurance mix (traditional vs ILN) and legislative impact—Management: Adam framed “traditional vs non-traditional” as still ending in quota share or excess-of-loss, sourced from either reinsurers or capital markets. Aurora preferred traditional for flexible execution and forward flow coverage locking pricing up to three years, while valuing ILN to return cyclically. On 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, management said it improves supply long-term but won’t matter near-term for private MI.

    Sentiment: POSITIVE

    Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the NMIH Q2 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

    Loading financial data and tables...
    © 2026 Stock Market Info — NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) Financial Profile