Gambling.com Group Limited

Gambling.com Group Limited (GAMB) Market Cap

Gambling.com Group Limited has a market capitalization of $83.5M.

Price: $2.37

-0.03 (-1.25%)

Market Cap: 83.53M

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: Charles Hanson Gillespie

Sector: Consumer Cyclical

Industry: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

IPO Date: 2021-07-23

Website: https://www.gambling.com/corporate

Gambling.com Group Limited (GAMB) - Company Information

Market Cap: 83.53M|Sector: Consumer Cyclical

Company Profile

Gambling.com Group Limited operates as a performance marketing company for the online gambling industry worldwide. The company provides digital marketing services for the iGaming and sports betting. It publishes various branded websites, including Gambling.com and Bookies.com. Gambling.com Group Limited was incorporated in 2006 and is based in St. Helier, Jersey.

Analyst Sentiment

87%
Strong Buy

From 8 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $6.42

▲ +170.9% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$5

Median

$6

High Bound

$9

Average

$6

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$6.42
▲ +170.89% Upside
Low Target
$5.00
111% Risk
Median Target
$6.00
153% Mid
High Target
$8.50
259% Max
Consensus
Buy
6 / 8 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)84137192287424449489357290
Enterprise Value ($M)196249289368501521503371305
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)-1.84-29.08-1.78-18.59-7.919.9915.4210.4810.45
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)-0.100.661.552.032.30
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)0.513.384.147.3610.7111.0513.8611.109.49
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)0.781.281.772.153.043.043.972.852.36
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)32.30-108.82-15.4526.8076.6443.6839.1025.90-13.31
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)6.166.259.4412.6612.8214.2611.549.99
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)-9.7335.18-12.21102.53-70.3729.7843.5731.5629.98
Debt to Equity Ratio-5.591.131.050.660.680.630.230.240.18

GAMB Growth Runway Model

Standard long term linear growth fade

Multi-Stage Discounted Cash Flow Sandbox

Market Price$2.37
Intrinsic Value$2.38
Market Alignment
Undervalued by 0.5%relative to calculated intrinsic value
9.00%
Exp: 9%9%
i

Growth runway slowdown

This value provides a time window for the growth rate to decline beyond Stage 1 toward the terminal rate. Longer windows are most useful for companies with high growth starting conditions or strong competitive advantages. This option stretches out the growth rate slowdown across 5, 10, or 15-year steps. A high-growth starting condition (exceeding a 25% initial growth rate) automatically applies a curve decay to simulate realistic, rapid market saturation.
i

Terminal growth rate

With long-term inflation between 3-5%, revenue must grow by that baseline to maintain flat real-world market share. This value sets the permanent terminal growth rate to factor into the valuation beyond the growth slowdown runway toward maturity.

3-Stage Financial Runway Horizon

🧠 Perpetuity Horizon Engine (Stage 3: Post-2035)

Terminal FCF Base$0.05B
Perpetuity TV Value$1.02B
Discounted TV (PV)$0.43B
TV Weighting %62.0%
⚠️
Financial Model Disclaimer & Risk Disclosure: This interactive scenario simulator is an educational sandbox provided strictly for informational and analytical research purposes. Core historical financial statements and consensus estimates are sourced directly via Financial Modeling Prep (FMP). All downstream outputs are entirely deterministic, hypothetical projections generated by combining automated mathematical formulas (including linear interpolation and Gaussian bell-curve decay models) with user-selected variables and third-party financial data inputs. Users assume all liability for trading decisions executed based on these sandbox calculations.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 GAMBLING COM GROUP LTD (GAMB) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

GAMBLING COM GROUP LTD operates in online iGaming through a lead-generation and content platform model. The company publishes gambling-related digital destinations (e.g., casino and sportsbook comparison/review sites) and uses audience-driven marketing to direct customers to licensed gambling operators. Monetisation is earned when referred users sign up and/or generate betting activity, typically under performance-based commercial terms with operator partners.

A second pillar is commercial enablement for operators—translating large-scale traffic, content expertise, and conversion optimisation into measurable acquisition outcomes. This structure links GAMBLING COM’s value creation to customer conversion performance (from initial intent to deposit/bet), rather than traditional retail economics.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

The revenue base is primarily performance-driven and can be characterised as follows:

  • Affiliate / lead-generation revenue: commissions tied to referred customer actions (commonly cost-per-acquisition and/or revenue share formats), making revenue sensitive to conversion rates and active-player monetisation by partners.
  • Operator-directed marketing performance: commercial arrangements that monetise the company’s ability to attract, qualify, and convert gambling customers across jurisdictions and verticals (casino, sports betting, and related products).
  • Digital advertising and content monetisation (where applicable): supplemental income streams tied to traffic and engagement economics.

Margin drivers are dominated by (1) customer acquisition efficiency (SEO/content quality and conversion optimisation), (2) mix of commission structures with operators, and (3) variable versus fixed cost structure in marketing, platform development, and compliance operations. Because the model does not require owning gambling inventory, it tends to be less capital intensive than operator-led platforms, while still bearing platform, content, and distribution costs.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

GAMBLING COM’s competitive advantages are largely intangible-asset and switching-cost derived, supported by measurable conversion analytics.

  • High switching costs for operator partners (performance and data gravity): operator partners rely on the affiliate channel’s historical performance, tracking, attribution settings, and audience targeting. Rebuilding equivalent conversion performance through another publisher typically requires time, experimentation, and renegotiation of commercial terms.
  • Intangible assets in content, brand endpoints, and search visibility: the company’s market position is underpinned by extensive gambling content infrastructure and domain-level assets that contribute to sustained organic discovery. Competitors can invest to compete, but matching rankings, content depth, and trust signals takes substantial time.
  • Operational conversion optimisation: the business benefits from systematic testing and funnel analytics, improving the linkage between traffic quality and deposit/bet outcomes. This can be difficult to replicate at equal scale.

Competitive benchmarking (primary peers):

  • Better Collective (Nordic iGaming affiliate group): similar focus on publishing and lead generation across iGaming verticals. While competition is direct in many markets, GAMBLING COM differentiates through its specific site network, operator relationships, and commercial structuring.
  • Catena Media: also builds iGaming content and affiliate funnels. The competitive overlap centers on SEO-driven acquisition and operator partner commissions; GAMBLING COM’s positioning relies on conversion performance and the breadth of its partner/operator coverage.
  • Sportradar (adjacent iGaming/sports data and technology): focuses more on data/odds and B2B technology enablement than on pure affiliate publishing. GAMBLING COM’s industry focus is audience-driven lead generation and operator-directed acquisition rather than data platforms.

Overall, the moat is not a physical-cost advantage; it is primarily distribution and conversion anchored by content/intangible assets and by partner reliance on proven acquisition performance.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, the growth opportunity is supported by secular demand expansion and incremental monetisation improvements:

  • Regulated online gambling market expansion: the rollout of regulated frameworks increases the addressable universe of legitimate operators and customers, supporting affiliate channel demand.
  • Ongoing shift from offline to online acquisition: operators increasingly allocate marketing budgets to performance-based channels with measurable player conversion.
  • Increased monetisation per user through funnel optimisation: as the company refines targeting and conversion pathways, incremental revenue can be generated without proportional traffic increases.
  • Product and jurisdiction diversification: spreading exposure across sports betting/casino segments and across regulated markets reduces dependence on any single promotional cycle.
  • Industry consolidation and scale economics: affiliate publishing is an execution-intensive space; scale can improve content throughput, testing velocity, and operator negotiation leverage.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Regulatory and compliance tightening: changes to iGaming advertising rules, affiliate attribution standards, marketing disclosures, or jurisdictional licensing requirements can compress monetisation or increase compliance costs.
  • Search and traffic concentration risk: the affiliate model depends materially on discoverability; algorithm changes, ranking volatility, or brand/site penalties can impair traffic growth and conversion rates.
  • Operator contract renegotiations: commission rates and terms can change based on operator competitive strategies, margin pressure, or internal acquisition build-outs.
  • Attribution integrity and fraud/brand-safety issues: attribution disputes or quality-control problems can lead to revenue adjustments and require stronger verification processes.
  • Content and platform cost inflation: sustaining content quality, compliance, and technology infrastructure requires ongoing investment; fixed cost creep can pressure margins if performance softens.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Markets typically value online iGaming lead-generation and content platforms using EV/EBITDA and P/S frameworks, with the valuation narrative anchored to:

  • Revenue durability (repeatable performance-based monetisation and partner concentration risk)
  • Conversion efficiency (deposit/bet conversion strength and funnel improvements)
  • Operating leverage (ability to grow without proportional cost increases)
  • Regulatory risk premium (degree of exposure to advertising/affiliate rule changes)

Key drivers that move sentiment include sustainable organic discovery, stability of commission economics, and evidence of improving monetisation per active acquired player.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

GAMBLING COM GROUP LTD presents an investment thesis rooted in digital distribution moats (content/intangible asset depth), performance-linked partner reliance that can create de facto switching costs, and an ability to enhance conversion economics through ongoing optimisation. The main debate for investors is the resilience of affiliate economics under regulatory and traffic-distribution constraints; the upside case rests on continued regulated market expansion and scalable conversion improvement.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for GAMB.

seekingalpha.com2026-05-15

Gambling.com Group Limited (GAMB) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Gambling.com Group Limited (GAMB) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

marketbeat.com2026-05-14

Gambling.com Group Q1 Earnings Call Highlights

Gambling.com Group NASDAQ: GAMB reported flat first-quarter revenue and lower profitability as growth in its sports data services business was offset by continued pressure in marketing tied to search rankings, regulatory changes and a shift toward non-SEO traffic channels.

businesswire.com2026-05-14

Gambling.com Group Reports First Quarter Results

CHARLOTTE, N.C.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Gambling.com Group Limited (Nasdaq: GAMB) (“Gambling.com Group” or the “Company”), a fast-growing technology company providing marketing and sports data services for the gambling industry, today reported financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2026. The Company today also adjusted its full year guidance and highlighted a proposed strategic restructure expected to reduce its workforce by 25% and deliver annualized savings of $13 million. Kevin Mc.

businesswire.com2026-05-01

Gambling.com Group to Report 2026 First Quarter Results on May 14 and Host Conference Call and Webcast

CHARLOTTE, N.C.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Gambling.com Group Limited (Nasdaq: GAMB) (“Gambling.com Group” or the “Company”), a fast-growing technology company providing marketing and sports data services for the gambling industry, today announced it will release its 2026 first quarter results after the market close on Thursday, May 14, 2026, and host a conference call and simultaneous webcast at 4:30 p.m. ET that day. During the call, Gambling.com Group Incoming Chief Executive Officer Kevin McCrystle,.

defenseworld.net2026-04-27

Gambling.com Group Limited (NASDAQ:GAMB) Receives Average Rating of “Moderate Buy” from Analysts

Gambling.com Group Limited (NASDAQ: GAMB - Get Free Report) has been assigned an average rating of "Moderate Buy" from the nine research firms that are currently covering the company, MarketBeat reports. One investment analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, three have given a hold rating, four have issued a buy rating and one

seekingalpha.com2026-04-12

Gambling.com: SEO Recovery Appears Underway

Gambling.com Group trades at distressed levels despite record FCF and revenue, with insiders recently acquiring 1.5% of the float. GAMB's marketing segment faces SEO headwinds, but rapid scaling of paid channels has offset revenue loss at the expense of margin compression. Sports data, now 25% of revenue, grows in the high teens but lacks scale to drive outsized future growth without exponential acceleration.

businesswire.com2026-03-26

Gambling.com Group Announces Senior Management Transition

CHARLOTTE, N.C.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Gambling.com Group Limited (Nasdaq: GAMB) (“Gambling.com Group” or the “Company”), a fast-growing technology company providing marketing and sports data services for the gambling industry, today announced that Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder Charles Gillespie will be appointed Executive Chairman of the Board and that current Chief Operating Officer and Co-Founder Kevin McCrystle will succeed Mr. Gillespie as Chief Executive Officer of the Compa.

seekingalpha.com2026-03-18

UnitedHealth, Hims & Hers, Gambling.Com - Value Investing With Raul Shah

Raul Shah from DocShah Financial shares his bullishness on top holdings, Hims & Hers (HIMS), UnitedHealth (UNH), and Gambling.com (GAMB). Tax gain harvesting and more tax takeaways for investors.

benzinga.com2026-03-14

These Analysts Lower Their Forecasts On Gambling.com Following Q4 Earnings

Gambling.com Group Limited (NASDAQ: GAMB) reported better-than-expected earnings for the fourth quarter on Thursday.

defenseworld.net2026-03-14

Gambling.com Group Q4 Earnings Call Highlights

Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ: GAMB) reported record fourth-quarter results for 2025, highlighted by strong growth in its sports data services business and a continued strategic shift to reduce reliance on search-driven marketing traffic. Management said the company's diversification efforts helped offset ongoing volatility in organic search rankings, even as margins compressed due to higher traffic acquisition costs

seekingalpha.com2026-03-12

Gambling.com Group Limited (GAMB) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Gambling.com Group Limited (GAMB) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

businesswire.com2026-03-12

Gambling.com Group Reports Fourth Quarter and Full-Year 2025 Results

CHARLOTTE, N.C.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Gambling.com Group Limited (Nasdaq: GAMB) (“Gambling.com Group” or the “Company”), a fast-growing technology company providing marketing and sports data services for the gambling industry, today reported record financial results for the fourth quarter and full-year ended December 31, 2025. The Company also introduced initial 2026 revenue and Adjusted EBITDA guidance. Charles Gillespie, Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder of Gambling.com Group, commented, “We.

247wallst.com2026-03-10

Gambling.com vs SharpLink Gaming: Sports Betting Stocks Compared

Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ: GAMB) and SharpLink Gaming (NASDAQ: SBET) share a sports betting origin story, but their most recent earnings reveal two companies with almost nothing in common.

defenseworld.net2026-02-20

Analyzing TechTarget (NASDAQ:TTGT) and Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ:GAMB)

Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ: GAMB - Get Free Report) and TechTarget (NASDAQ: TTGT - Get Free Report) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings. Analyst Recommendations This is a summary of

businesswire.com2026-02-19

Gambling.com Group to Report 2025 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Results on March 12 and Host Conference Call and Webcast

CHARLOTTE, N.C.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Gambling.com Group Limited (Nasdaq: GAMB) (“Gambling.com Group” or the “Company”), a fast-growing provider of marketing and sports data services for the global online gambling industry, today announced it will release its 2025 fourth quarter and full year results before the market opens on Thursday, March 12, 2026, and host a conference call and simultaneous webcast at 8:00 a.m. ET that day. During the call, Gambling.com Group Chief Executive Officer and Co-fou.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"GAMB reported Q1’26 revenue of $40.4M and EPS of -$0.0334, with net income of -$1.18M (net margin -2.9%). On a YoY basis, revenue decreased from $40.6M (Q1’25) to $40.4M (Q1’26), a decline of about -0.48%, and net income swung from +$11.24M to -$1.18M (a deterioration of roughly -110.5%). QoQ, revenue fell from $46.2M in Q4’25 to $40.4M in Q1’26 (-12.5%), while net income improved materially from -$26.9M in Q4’25 to -$1.18M in Q1’26. Profitability is volatile: gross margin compressed vs the prior year (75.5% vs 94.5% in Q1’25) and also vs Q4’25 (75.5% vs 85.1%), while operating margin stayed low at 8.1% but the bottom line remains negative due to heavy net other income/expense effects and tax/interest dynamics. Cash flow weakened: operating cash flow was -$1.17M and free cash flow was -$1.26M in Q1’26, alongside a sharp cash decline to $8.41M from $15.8M at Q4’25. Total shareholder returns look poor: the stock is down -69.1% over 1 year with no dividend, and no buybacks are shown in the quarter, implying capital appreciation has been negative. Balance sheet leverage remains meaningful with total debt ~$120.9M and equity ~$107.1M (debt-to-equity ~1.13), but liquidity is tighter than Q4’25 (cash down, current assets slightly down)."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

Revenue was essentially flat YoY (-0.48%) but down QoQ (-12.5%) from Q4’25 to Q1’26, indicating a weakening near-term trajectory.

Profitability

Neutral

Net income deteriorated sharply YoY (+$11.24M to -$1.18M) and margins compressed (gross margin 75.5% vs 94.5% YoY). QoQ net loss improved, but profitability remains unstable.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Q1’26 operating cash flow was -$1.17M and free cash flow -$1.26M, contrasting with positive OCF/FCF in prior periods (e.g., Q1’25). No dividends/buybacks to support shareholder returns.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Caution

Equity is stable-ish (~$107M) but leverage is elevated (debt-to-equity ~1.13). Liquidity tightened materially: cash fell to $8.41M from $15.81M at Q4’25.

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

Total return is heavily negative: price is down -69.1% over 1 year and there is no dividend. Buybacks are not evident in Q1’26.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

With price ~$3.68 versus consensus target ~$6.42, implied upside exists, but the recent fundamentals (loss and cash burn) reduce confidence in near-term valuation support.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

GAMB delivered flat Q1 revenue ($40.4M) but profitability deteriorated sharply as marketing faced continued UK/Finland regulatory pressure plus SEO-quality headwinds. Data services accelerated (+13% YoY) to $11.2M and became the highest mix contributor (28% of revenue), powered by OpticOdds momentum: 94% new deal growth vs Q1’25, +24% active partners QoQ, and a continued shift to API customers (86%). However, traffic and monetization diversification raised costs: gross margin fell from 94% to 85% (−900 bps) and adjusted EBITDA margin fell from 39% to 22% (−1,700 bps), leading to adjusted EPS of $0.09 vs $0.46. Management’s key offset is a proposed ~25% workforce reduction with ~$13M annualized savings, targeted to begin in Q3 with sequential improvement expected in H2. FY 2026 guidance narrows to $165M–$170M revenue and $45M–$50M adjusted EBITDA, with buybacks deferred in favor of deleveraging.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Sports data services growth +13% YoY to $11.2M; reached 28% of total revenue (highest mix yet).
  • OpticOdds B2B OpticOdds: 94% new deal growth vs Q1’25; total active partners +24% QoQ.
  • OpticOdds shift toward API customers: 86% of customers now API vs traditional odd-screen partners.
  • International partner acceleration: international partners +178% YoY.
  • Claude enterprise integration via MCP to embed Optics data directly into customers’ workflows.

Business Development

  • Perplexity partnership: OpticOdds to be odds data provider across Perplexity product suite; expected launch before end of Q2.
  • OpticOdds: MCP integration into Claude (enterprise AI workflow integration).
  • Prediction market customer ramp: increased traffic sent to prediction markets and expectation to continue ramping through the year.

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Revenue $40.4M flat YoY and in line with expectations; data services +13% YoY offset marketing -5% YoY.
  • Adjusted EBITDA $9.0M; adjusted EBITDA margin 22% vs 39% YoY (down 1,700 bps).
  • Adjusted EPS $0.09 vs $0.46 YoY; adjusted net income $3.8M vs $16.5M YoY.
  • Gross profit margin 85% vs 94% YoY (down 900 bps) driven by traffic diversification mix and higher cost of sales.
  • Marketing decline drivers: low-quality search impacts plus UK & Finland regulatory headwinds; UK&I LTVs down and traffic lower.
  • Tax/interest noted as contributors to adjusted net income decline (higher interest expense and tax charges); prior-year FY included $3.9M finance income from FX.

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Cash $8.4M at March 31; total liquidity $40.9M including undrawn revolver; $121M outstanding on credit facility.
  • Settled deferred consideration/transaction bonuses: $6.2M related to OddsJam; repaid $2.8M on term loan.
  • No planned buybacks in the short term; management focus is deleveraging pending improving H2 free cash flow/FC conversion.

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • AI-first operating model: 80% of new codes generated by AI; shift to context layers/skills/agents; fewer management layers targeted.
  • Proposed restructuring: reduce workforce by ~25%; annualized savings ~$13M (net of higher AI usage costs).
  • Timing of savings: realize ~half in H2 2026 starting in Q3; full benefit in 2027.
  • Non-SEO diversification: in Q1 non-SEO was close to 60% of marketing business; partner audience monetization platform revenue up 3x YoY in Q1.
  • Traffic diversification mix impact: cost of sales rose from $2.2M to $6.1M YoY; gross profit declined 11% to $34.4M.

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Updated FY 2026 guidance: revenue $165M–$170M; adjusted EBITDA $45M–$50M; expects sequential growth and margin expansion in H2.
  • SEO guidance stance: management does not want to quantify Google-driven “green shoots” persistence; notes first positive shift since mid-last year beginning mid-April/Q2.

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • UK&I LTV declines (partly SEO-driven) and regulatory headwinds in UK and Finland reduced marketing performance and margins.
  • SEO volatility/Google unpredictability: green shoots observed but not yet guide-able.
  • Traffic diversification and mix shift pressured contribution margins (gross margin down 900 bps YoY; EBITDA margin down 1,700 bps YoY).
  • Higher external marketing expenses and higher subscription costs from increased AI usage weighed on Q1 profitability.
  • FX/interest/tax noise: prior-year finance income from FX distorts comparability; higher interest expense and tax charges impacted net income.

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Topic: UK&I decline drivers and post-April tax/regulatory update: Management described the same Q4 trends—LTVs down in the UK from both SEO and regulation, with robust demand for traffic but lower traffic levels. After mid-April, Gambling.com saw early “green shoots” on SEO specific to the brand, not quantified for guidance.
  • Topic: Restructuring implementation costs and AI-first quality safeguards: Management said restructure risk is monitored through quality review and direction-setting rather than speed alone; automation accelerates production while humans retain craft review. Elias quantified one-time restructuring implementation expense at ~$2.5M. Charles emphasized more risk in not moving than moving too fast.
  • Topic: Guidance bridge—what changed vs Q4 and the margin compression mechanics: Elias clarified incremental changes were a faster shift away from SEO than previously guided, lowering revenue expectations by ~$5M due to lower SEO run-rate. Cost of sales increases ~$5M from mix shift, offset by ~$5M lower adjusted operating expenses, including ~$6.5M restructuring savings partially offset by ~$1.5M higher marketing expenses.

Sentiment: CAUTIOUS

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the GAMB Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for GAMB.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
No recent 10-K available.
No recent 10-Q available.
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (GAMB)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Gambling.com Group Limited (GAMB) Financial Profile