Linde plc

Linde plc (LIN) Market Cap

Linde plc has a market capitalization of $234.95B.

Price: $507.90

0.45 (0.09%)

Market Cap: 234.95B

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: Sanjiv Lamba

Sector: Basic Materials

Industry: Chemicals - Specialty

IPO Date: 1992-06-17

Website: https://www.linde.com

Linde plc (LIN) - Company Information

Market Cap: 234.95B|Sector: Basic Materials

Company Profile

Linde plc operates as an industrial gas and engineering company in North and South America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific. It offers atmospheric gases, including oxygen, nitrogen, argon, and rare gases; and process gases, such as carbon dioxide, helium, hydrogen, electronic gases, specialty gases, and acetylene. The company also designs and constructs turnkey process plants for third-party customers, as well as for the gas businesses in various locations, such as olefin, natural gas, air separation, hydrogen, and synthesis gas plants. It serves a range of industries, including healthcare, energy, manufacturing, food, beverage carbonation, fiber-optics, steel making, aerospace, chemicals, and water treatment. The company was founded in 1879 and is based in Woking, the United Kingdom.

Analyst Sentiment

77%
Strong Buy

From 27 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $562.14

▲ +10.7% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$525

Median

$570

High Bound

$600

Average

$562

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$562.14
▲ +10.68% Upside
Low Target
$525.00
3% Risk
Median Target
$570.00
12% Mid
High Target
$600.00
18% Max
Consensus
Buy
24 / 28 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)234,955230,058198,803222,681220,920220,389199,230227,778205,880
Enterprise Value ($M)255,677250,780220,736244,097242,054238,992216,989244,853222,772
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)33.0830.9731.6028.8631.2732.9328.8736.7430.95
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)159.6718.2720.436.6234.1315.01
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)6.7826.2022.6825.8526.0127.1724.0627.2624.90
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)6.115.975.205.775.745.795.235.815.39
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)46.11256.19126.47133.18231.57247.35127.79136.80258.64
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)28.5625.1928.3328.4929.4626.2029.3026.95
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)20.77100.5972.9771.0072.1577.3463.6781.0069.77
Debt to Equity Ratio1.680.640.710.670.670.630.590.570.56

LIN Growth Runway Model

Standard long term linear growth fade

Multi-Stage Discounted Cash Flow Sandbox

Market Price$507.90
Intrinsic Value$280.44
Market Alignment
Overvalued by 44.8%relative to calculated intrinsic value
9.00%
Exp: 1%1%
i

Growth runway slowdown

This value provides a time window for the growth rate to decline beyond Stage 1 toward the terminal rate. Longer windows are most useful for companies with high growth starting conditions or strong competitive advantages. This option stretches out the growth rate slowdown across 5, 10, or 15-year steps. A high-growth starting condition (exceeding a 25% initial growth rate) automatically applies a curve decay to simulate realistic, rapid market saturation.
i

Terminal growth rate

With long-term inflation between 3-5%, revenue must grow by that baseline to maintain flat real-world market share. This value sets the permanent terminal growth rate to factor into the valuation beyond the growth slowdown runway toward maturity.

3-Stage Financial Runway Horizon

🧠 Perpetuity Horizon Engine (Stage 3: Post-2035)

Terminal FCF Base$10.62B
Perpetuity TV Value$199.93B
Discounted TV (PV)$84.45B
TV Weighting %58.0%
⚠️
Financial Model Disclaimer & Risk Disclosure: This interactive scenario simulator is an educational sandbox provided strictly for informational and analytical research purposes. Core historical financial statements and consensus estimates are sourced directly via Financial Modeling Prep (FMP). All downstream outputs are entirely deterministic, hypothetical projections generated by combining automated mathematical formulas (including linear interpolation and Gaussian bell-curve decay models) with user-selected variables and third-party financial data inputs. Users assume all liability for trading decisions executed based on these sandbox calculations.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 LINDE PLC (LIN) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Linde operates in industrial gases and related services. The core value chain starts with producing gases (such as nitrogen, oxygen, argon, and hydrogen where applicable) from air separation and, in select markets, feedstock-based processes. From there, the company delivers gases to customers through its manufacturing network and distribution systems (pipelines, tank/truck networks, and on-site generation). Customers use these gases as critical inputs into end-markets such as chemicals, metals, refining, healthcare, and electronics manufacturing.

A key feature of the model is that production and delivery are engineered around customer requirements and uptime. Many customers receive gases under long-term supply arrangements, and Linde frequently participates in system design and optimization (capacity planning, purity specifications, and operational continuity), which increases customer reliance on Linde’s installed assets and operating know-how.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is primarily generated from (1) long-term supply contracts delivering industrial gases and (2) sales through a broader merchant model where contracts are shorter or volume-linked. Monetisation tends to be supported by a “blend” of recurring customer demand and contractual pricing mechanisms that often track key cost drivers such as energy and industrial inflation.

Margin drivers typically include:

  • High utilization of capital assets: Plants and distribution networks are cost-intensive; earnings quality improves when volumes and uptime are maintained.
  • Mix shift toward contract-based and higher-value services: Contract structures can reduce volume volatility and support more predictable cash flows.
  • Energy management and process efficiency: Industrial gas production is energy-sensitive; operational improvements and procurement discipline matter.
  • Portfolio of delivery modes: Pipeline systems and on-site generation can lower delivered cost and reduce customer total cost of supply.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Linde’s moat is best described as a combination of logistical infrastructure advantages, cost advantage, and contractual/customer switching frictions.

Logistical infrastructure & delivery density create a geographic and operational barrier. Once customers are served by pipelines or integrated distribution networks (or when on-site capacity is built to specifications), the delivered cost structure becomes hard to replicate quickly. Competitors must match not only plant capacity but also the delivery footprint and reliability performance.

Customer switching costs are materially elevated by the integration of gases into industrial processes. Purity specifications, safety requirements, commissioning timelines, and downtime risks make switching a non-trivial operational change. Long-term contracts further reinforce stickiness.

Competitive benchmarking:

  • Air Products and Chemicals (APD) and Air Liquide (AIQUY) are closest large-scale peers in industrial gases. Their strategies also emphasize integrated production plus distribution and long-term customer relationships.
  • Prairie/Regional and other local industrial gas producers can compete on merchant sales in narrower geographic footprints, but typically lack the same breadth of delivery infrastructure and contract coverage.

Compared with these peers, Linde’s industry focus remains industrial customers with a strong emphasis on delivery footprint buildout and asset integration, enabling a consistent delivered-cost position. While APD and Air Liquide are similarly positioned, the practical contest is won at the level of regional network density and reliability rather than pricing alone.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, growth is supported by both demand expansion in core end-markets and elevated capital expenditure cycles tied to decarbonisation and industrial upgrading.

  • Hydrogen and lower-carbon industrial molecules: Many industrial sectors require hydrogen and synthesis gases; building and servicing these supply chains benefits from Linde’s experience in high-purity production, compression/handling, and safe industrial operations.
  • Energy and feedstock cost discipline (geographic cost advantages): Industrial gas economics depend on power, utilities, and air separation efficiency. In markets with competitive energy costs and stable industrial demand, delivered economics can remain attractive.
  • Industrial capacity additions: New refining, chemicals, steel, and electronics investments create long-duration demand for gases and related services, often requiring “installed base” supply arrangements.
  • Logistical infrastructure scale effects: Pipelines, tank networks, and on-site assets improve unit economics as volume scales and contract coverage deepens.
  • Healthcare and specialty gases growth: While smaller than bulk gases, regulated and quality-driven segments can offer steadier demand and higher service intensity.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Capital intensity and execution risk: Industrial gas businesses require large-scale assets. Construction delays, cost overruns, or underutilisation can pressure returns.
  • Energy cost and inflation pass-through: Pricing mechanisms may not perfectly offset input cost movements; power and utilities remain key sensitivities.
  • Regulatory and permitting constraints: Industrial projects depend on permitting, environmental standards, and local operating approvals.
  • Customer concentration and industrial cycle exposure: End-market downturns can reduce volumes and impact utilization.
  • Technological substitution and demand redesign: Long-term process changes in customers’ production methods can alter gas consumption profiles.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The market typically values industrial gas producers using enterprise value frameworks that reflect structural cash generation, including EV/EBITDA and cash-flow-oriented measures. For investors, key valuation movers often include:

  • Quality and durability of contract mix: Higher contract coverage and pricing resilience can support multiple stability.
  • Asset utilization and project pipeline execution: Returns on large projects influence forward earnings quality.
  • Capital discipline and free cash flow conversion: The balance between growth capex and cash generation impacts perceived risk.
  • Interest rates and industrial credit conditions: Because the business is asset heavy, changes in discount rates and cost of capital can influence valuation.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Linde’s long-term investment case rests on hard-to-replicate logistical infrastructure, delivered-cost advantages, and contractual and operational switching frictions that anchor customer demand. While competition exists among large global peers, winning share is largely determined by regional network density, reliability, and integrated asset execution—attributes that support durable cash flow and ongoing growth opportunities tied to industrial capacity expansion and evolving hydrogen-related demand.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for LIN.

gurufocus.com2026-06-01

Is LIN Overvalued? DCF Says Worth $327

On June 01, 2026, we delve into the DCF analysis for Linde PLC (LIN), a company currently trading at $497.69. The stock has experienced a price performance of -

businesswire.com2026-06-01

Linde Publishes 2025 Sustainable Development Report

WOKING, England--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Linde (Nasdaq: LIN) has published its 2025 Sustainable Development Report, highlighting measurable progress against its sustainability commitments and the growing impact of its technologies in supporting customers' decarbonization efforts. In 2025, Linde reduced absolute greenhouse gas emissions by 10% versus its 2021 baseline and increased the share of electricity from low-carbon and renewable sources to 50%, advancing toward its 2035 emissions reduction targe.

fool.com2026-05-30

Bloom Energy vs. Plug Power: Which Hydrogen Stock Is a Better Buy in 2026?

Between Bloom Energy and Plug Power, one company is generating positive cash flows and growing its revenue at a torrid pace.

invezz.com2026-05-23

These three stocks are must-own ahead of the SpaceX IPO

As the global financial community eagerly awaits SpaceX's historic initial public offering (IPO) – rumoured to command some $1.7 trillion valuation on June 12 – a wave of capital is flooding into public space stocks. This unprecedented offering promises to shine a “blinding spotlight” on the entire commercial space ecosystem, resetting industry benchmarks and driving institutional demand to a fever pitch.

fool.com2026-05-13

3 Stocks That Could Benefit From the SpaceX IPO

SpaceX could raise $75 billion in capital with its IPO, giving it more cash to spend on various projects. The IPO gives an opportunity for this early investor to sell stock and redeploy cash in high-return opportunities.

fool.com2026-05-13

3 Materials Stocks to Buy Before the Next Industrial Boom

The materials sector is flying high this year, and if an all-out industrial revolution arrives, these three stocks could benefit.

fool.com2026-05-11

The Helium Shortage Exposed the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Supercycle's Weakest Link. Could a Ceasefire Fix It?

The ceasefire may be precariously holding for now, but the strikes on Qatar earlier this year exposed a supply chain vulnerability few investors were watching: The AI boom depends on helium.

seekingalpha.com2026-05-09

$5,000 Monthly Passive Income For Financial Freedom

In this article, we will discuss why financial independence is important, not just for retirees but for anyone aspiring for a stress-free and secure financial life. We present a buy-and-hold, easy-to-maintain portfolio formed with only nine funds. The portfolio is income-focused and is diversified in termsof strategies and asset classes, and likely to provide market-matchinggrowth. We will also demonstrate that if you invest a reasonable sum today inincome-growing funds, it takes roughly 10-12 years to potentially generate$5,000 of monthly income.

fool.com2026-05-07

Even if the Iran War Ends, These Artificial Intelligence (AI) Growth Stocks Face a Helium Problem That Isn't Going Away

The conflict in Iran has disrupted the supply of helium, which is crucial to chipmaking and other industries.

seekingalpha.com2026-05-05

Linde: A Great Business That's A Bit Too Expensive

Linde (LIN) remains a best-in-class industrial with robust margins, 33 years of dividend growth, and disciplined capital allocation. Q1'26 results reinforced business resilience: 10% EPS growth, 30% margins, and $1.5B returned to shareholders, despite only 1% underlying volume growth. Secular tailwinds in electronics, aerospace, and helium offer long-term upside, but near-term volume recovery is not yet visible, especially in EMEA.

businesswire.com2026-05-05

Linde Earns Dow Jones Best-in-Class and S&P Global Recognition for Sustainability Leadership

WOKING, England--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Linde (Nasdaq: LIN) today announced it has been included in the Dow Jones Best-in-Class Indices (previously known as Dow Jones Sustainability Indices) for the 23rd consecutive year. The Dow Jones Best-in-Class World Index comprises global sustainability leaders as identified by S&P Global through the Corporate Sustainability Assessment (CSA). It represents the top 10% of the largest 2,500 companies in the S&P Global BMI based on long-term economic, envi.

gurufocus.com2026-05-02

Linde PLC (LIN) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong EPS Growth and Strategic Acquisitions Propel Performance

EPS: $4.33, a 10% increase year-over-year.Operating Margin: 30%.Return on Capital: 23.8%.Revenue: $8.8 billion, up 8% year-over-year.Operating Profit: $2.6 bil

zacks.com2026-05-01

Linde Q1 Earnings Beat Estimates, Revenues Rise Y/Y, Dividend Raised

LIN's bottom line beat Q1 estimates as pricing and project start-ups drive growth, with revenues up 8% and EPS rising 10% year over year.

seekingalpha.com2026-05-01

Linde plc (LIN) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Linde plc (LIN) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

gurufocus.com2026-05-01

Linde (LIN) Q1 2026: Adjusted EPS $4.33 vs $4.23 est (beat), Revenue $8.78B vs $8.89B est (miss) -- Overvalued by 8.5%? GF Score 94/100

On May 1, 2026, Linde PLC (LIN) released its 8-K filing detailing first-quarter 2026 results. The company reported sales of $8.78 billion, operating profit of $

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"LIN reported Q1 2026 revenue of $8.781B and net income of $1.857B (EPS: $4.00). YoY, revenue rose +8.25% (from $8.112B in Q1’25) and net income increased +8.52% (from $1.673B). QoQ, revenue was essentially flat at +0.20% (vs. $8.764B in Q4’25), while net income rose +18.1% (from $1.573B). Profitability improved over the last quarter: net margin expanded to 21.15% from 17.95% in Q4’25, and operating margin increased to 27.78% from 23.03%, indicating operating leverage and/or improved below-the-line items. Cash flow quality remained strong. Operating cash flow was $2.240B and free cash flow (FCF) was $0.898B in Q1’26, compared with $1.572B FCF in Q4’25—still solid but down sequentially. Dividends paid were $741M, and the payout ratio was ~39.9% of earnings, suggesting continued shareholder distributions funded by profits. Balance sheet resilience is notable: total assets were $86.315B and total equity was $40.079B, with leverage moderate (debt-to-equity ~0.64). For shareholder returns, the stock is up +9.88% over 1 year (no >20% momentum boost), with a small dividend yield (~0.32%). Analyst consensus price target (~$539.7) implies upside to the current price."

Revenue Growth

Positive

YoY revenue growth was +8.25% in Q1’26 vs Q1’25. QoQ growth was modest at +0.20% vs Q4’25, suggesting steady demand with some deceleration sequentially.

Profitability

Good

Net income increased +8.52% YoY, and profitability improved sharply QoQ: net margin 21.15% in Q1’26 vs 17.95% in Q4’25; operating margin 27.78% vs 23.03%.

Cash Flow Quality

Positive

Q1’26 operating cash flow was $2.240B and FCF $0.898B. While FCF fell QoQ (from $1.572B), cash generation still supports dividends; payout ratio was ~39.9% of earnings.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Good

Total assets were $86.315B and equity was $40.079B. Leverage appears manageable (debt-to-equity ~0.64) with strong equity base and high interest coverage (~39x).

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

1-year price performance was +9.88% and dividend yield was ~0.32%. Returns are positive but no strong >20% 1Y momentum tailwind; buybacks weren’t indicated as active in the cash flow line item for this quarter.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Positive

Consensus target is ~$539.7 vs current ~$492.2, implying upside. Valuation looks demanding (P/E ~31x in the latest ratios), but improved margins support the multiple.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

Linde delivered a solid Q1 2026 with EPS of $4.33 (+10% YoY) and sales of $8.8B (+8% YoY), while sequential operating margin improved +50 bps to 30% despite seasonal volume softness. Management emphasized that pricing and cost productivity are offsetting weaker volumes, particularly in EMEA where chemicals/energy volumes remain pressured by Middle East conflict spillovers and customer production shifts. APAC softness was framed as timing and a mix effect: equipment sales tied to long-term electronics merchant contracts run lower margin, plus Q1 seasonality. On capital allocation, Linde generated $900M free cash flow and repurchased $800M, while funding growth; sale-of-gas backlog ended Q1 at $7.1B after starting 10 projects and adding 5 new projects. Guidance was updated upward only on the bottom: full-year EPS $17.60–$17.90 (+7%–9%), with helium improvements excluded (upside if disruptions allow higher volumes/price). Helium remains a key near-term variable and EMEA demand is the principal headwind.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Ultra-high purity electronics project backlog: investing >$1 billion to support advanced fabs in the U.S., China and Korea
  • Project start-ups in APAC driving volume growth (volume up 1% YoY) and underwriting continued base volume growth in Americas and APAC
  • Hydrogen/nitrogen and U.S. Gulf Coast refining activity (Americas) and Jurong Island integrated complex contributions (APAC)
  • Metals and mining supported by improved local U.S. to Latin America production dynamics and greater competitiveness of gas-intensive integrated blast furnaces vs EAFs

Business Development

  • Signed 9 bolt-on acquisitions in Q1 2026, primarily in the Americas (1% net acquisitions contribution to sales growth)
  • Electronics/merchant ecosystem: equipment tied to long-term merchant contracts (lower average margin but supports future contracted merchant sales)
  • Helium: priority to meet existing contracted customer commitments and pursue new multiyear contracts with high-quality customers (anticipate excess molecules post-commitment period)
  • Commercial space: working with major and up-and-coming launch providers to secure contractual relationships tied to launch cadence and nearby logistics hub requirements

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • EPS $4.33 (+10% YoY; +5% excluding currency translation); slightly above top of guidance range due to performance as anticipated
  • Sales $8.8B (+8% YoY; flat sequentially); underlying sales +3% YoY (2% higher pricing, 1% higher volumes); underlying sales flat sequentially (higher pricing offset lower volumes)
  • Operating profit $2.6B (+8% YoY) with operating margin 30% (flat YoY) and +50 bps sequential improvement driven by pricing/cost productivity offsetting seasonal volume declines
  • Helium not included as an improvement in updated guidance vs February; any additional helium volumes/price are upside
  • Guidance raised bottom: Q2 EPS $4.40–$4.50 (+8% to +10%), and full-year EPS $17.60–$17.90 (+7% to +9%) with 1% currency tailwind; no midpoint economic improvement; bottom raised by $0.20

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Repurchased $800 million of stock during the quarter; reinvesting almost $1.5 billion into the business
  • Free cash flow $900 million (OCF $2.2B); used primarily for dividends and share repurchases
  • CapEx $1.3B split between base CapEx and project backlog; sale of gas backlog projects started: 10 projects with ~$300M investment and 5 new projects added ~$100M, taking backlog to $7.1B
  • Operating cash flow seasonality noted: first half weaker due to interest/tax/incentive payment timing; 2026 expected similar pattern

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Margin execution: management actions in pricing and cost productivity expected to continue supporting 2026 margin expansion
  • Helium approach: maintain contracted coverage first; then pursue new multiyear contracts; avoid significant spot sales this year
  • Europe actions: management indicating business teams are taking steps to improve EMEA underperformance attributed to weaker industrial/chemicals volumes and Middle East conflict impacts
  • Project execution phasing: one very large nitrogen/ATR/sequestration project—nitrogen expected mid-year; ATR and TNS slipped to essentially Q1 next year; small portion contributes in 2026 via atmospheric start-up

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Q2 2026 EPS guidance: $4.40–$4.50 (8%–10% growth), includes ~1% currency benefit; assumes no economic improvement at midpoint
  • Full-year 2026 EPS guidance: $17.60–$17.90 (7%–9% growth), includes ~1% currency tailing; bottom raised by $0.20; top held at $17.90 due to early optimism; does not assume improved helium vs February guidance

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • EMEA negative volumes in chemicals/energy and manufacturing due to weaker industrial environment and direct/indirect impacts from Middle East conflict; possibility of longer-term feedstock relocation effects remains uncertain
  • APAC seasonality and equipment-related sales temporarily depress mix: about half of APAC sales growth attributed to equipment connected to long-term merchant contracts (lower average margin, described as a timing/mix one-off)
  • Helium supply shock uncertainty: Strait of Hormuz constraints and damage-related capacity limits for multiyears; pricing roll-through may be delayed or less than prior shocks if disruptions persist differently vs Russia
  • Construction and subcontractor environment on U.S. Coast remains challenging affecting timing of hydrogen-related ATR/TNS phases (slippage into Q1 next year)

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Margins and geographic bridge: Analysts asked what drove Americas outperformance while Europe was flat and Asia down, including whether cost inflation and any March squeeze explained intra-quarter volatility. Management said full-year confidence in margin lift of 40–60 bps (or better) and attributed Europe weakness to volume drag from industrial/chemicals plus Middle East impacts; APAC softness included seasonality and one-off equipment sales tied to lower-margin contracts.
  • Helium supply shock mechanics: Analysts asked how the current helium disruption differs from the prior Russia shock and when pricing would roll into contracts. Management said helium is 85%–90% contracted; Q1 saw roughly flat sales, with pricing slightly down YoY and volumes slightly up; Strait of Hormuz timing (about two-thirds into quarter) suggests continued average pricing increases throughout the year plus additional long-term agreement wins as volume opportunities arise.
  • Electronics backlog and store-growth signaling: Analysts asked whether management’s expected large electronics contracts are still forthcoming for FY26 and how backlog trajectory may evolve. Management affirmed high confidence in announcements “shortly,” tied to adding projects to sale-of-gas backlog from $7B+, expecting an “8 handle” backlog by year-end based on timing, plus guidance embedding for phasing of large projects where construction delays push some start-ups into early next year.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the LIN Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for LIN.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (LIN)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Linde plc (LIN) Financial Profile